Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示

ring%3adependency-mapping环%3 依赖性映射

Agent Skill

ring%3adependency-mapping 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

574

周安装

23

GitHub Stars

180

下载量

186
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3adependency-mapping(环%3 依赖性映射)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Adependency-mapping
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:dependency-mapping
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:dependency-mapping

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合整理仓库状态与变更事项。

  • 支持围绕代码协作流程进行信息组织与问题排查。
  • 通过 GitHub 仓库获取技能定义,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。
  • ring%3adependency-mapping 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Dependency Mapping Skill

Systematic identification and management of cross-project dependencies.

Purpose

This skill provides a framework for:

  • Dependency identification
  • Dependency classification
  • Impact analysis
  • Critical path identification
  • Dependency tracking and management

Prerequisites

Before dependency mapping, ensure:

PrerequisiteRequired ForSource
Project schedulesTimeline analysisProject managers
Project deliverablesDependency identificationProject plans
External contractsVendor dependenciesProcurement
Integration pointsTechnical dependenciesArchitecture

Dependency Types

Internal Dependencies

TypeDefinitionExample
Finish-to-Start (FS)B starts when A finishesDevelopment → Testing
Start-to-Start (SS)B starts when A startsParallel workstreams
Finish-to-Finish (FF)B finishes when A finishesCode freeze → Doc freeze
Start-to-Finish (SF)B finishes when A startsRare, shift handoff

External Dependencies

TypeDefinitionRisk Level
VendorThird-party deliveryMedium-High
RegulatoryApproval or certificationHigh
InfrastructureEnvironment availabilityMedium
IntegrationAPI or system availabilityMedium-High
ResourceShared resource availabilityMedium

Dependency Mapping Gates

Gate 1: Dependency Identification

Objective: Identify all dependencies across portfolio

Actions:

  1. Review project schedules for cross-project links
  2. Interview project managers
  3. Document deliverable handoffs
  4. Identify external dependencies

Identification Questions:

  • What does this project need from other projects?
  • What does this project provide to other projects?
  • What external inputs are needed?
  • What must be complete before this can start?

Output: docs/pmo/{date}/dependency-inventory.md


Gate 2: Dependency Classification

Objective: Classify dependencies by type and criticality

Actions:

  1. Classify by dependency type (FS, SS, FF, SF)
  2. Classify by source (internal/external)
  3. Assess criticality (critical path/slack)
  4. Document constraints and assumptions

Criticality Assessment:

LevelCriteriaManagement
CriticalOn critical path, no slackDaily monitoring
High< 1 week slackWeekly monitoring
Medium1-4 weeks slackBi-weekly monitoring
Low> 4 weeks slackMonthly monitoring

Output: docs/pmo/{date}/dependency-classification.md


Gate 3: Impact Analysis

Objective: Understand impact of dependency failure

Actions:

  1. Analyze schedule impact
  2. Analyze cost impact
  3. Identify cascade effects
  4. Document mitigation options

Impact Assessment Template:

DependencyIf Delayed BySchedule ImpactCost ImpactCascade To
[Dep]1 week[Impact][Impact][Projects]
[Dep]2 weeks[Impact][Impact][Projects]
[Dep]1 month[Impact][Impact][Projects]

Output: docs/pmo/{date}/dependency-impact.md


Gate 4: Critical Path Analysis

Objective: Identify and protect the critical path

Actions:

  1. Map critical path across projects
  2. Identify dependencies on critical path
  3. Analyze buffer/slack
  4. Recommend protection measures

Critical Path Visualization:

Project A: [Task A1] → [Task A2] → [Deliverable A]
                                          ↓
Project B:                        [Task B1] → [Task B2] → [Deliverable B]
                                                                  ↓
Project C:                                               [Task C1] → [Task C2] → [Final]

Protection Measures:

  • Buffer allocation
  • Parallel path development
  • Early warning triggers
  • Contingency plans

Output: docs/pmo/{date}/critical-path-analysis.md


Gate 5: Dependency Tracking Plan

Objective: Create ongoing tracking and management plan

Actions:

  1. Define tracking frequency per criticality
  2. Assign dependency owners
  3. Create communication plan
  4. Define escalation triggers

Tracking Template:

DependencyOwnerUpdate FreqStatusNext MilestoneRisk
[Dep][Owner][Freq][Status][Date: Milestone][Risk]

Escalation Triggers:

  • Critical dependency at risk
  • External dependency delayed
  • Cascade impact identified
  • Owner not responding

Output: docs/pmo/{date}/dependency-tracking-plan.md


Anti-Rationalization Table

See shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md for universal anti-rationalizations.

Dependency-Specific Anti-Rationalizations

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"We've documented the main dependencies"Undocumented dependencies cause surprise delays.Document ALL dependencies
"That's a soft dependency, not critical"Soft dependencies become hard when they fail.Classify and track all
"External vendor always delivers"Past performance ≠ future guarantee.Track and verify externals
"Projects will coordinate directly"Ad-hoc coordination fails under pressure.Formal tracking required

Pressure Resistance

See shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md for universal pressure scenarios.

Dependency-Specific Pressures

Pressure TypeRequestAgent Response
"We trust the other team, don't track""Trust doesn't prevent delays. Tracking enables early action."
"Too many dependencies to track""Complexity requires MORE tracking, not less. Will prioritize by criticality."
"Vendor said it's on track""Vendor assurance needs verification. Confirming with evidence."

Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ALWAYS pause and report blocker for:

SituationRequired Action
Critical dependency at riskSTOP. Immediate escalation. Cascade impact pending.
Circular dependency identifiedSTOP. Architectural issue requires resolution.
External dependency failedSTOP. Contingency activation required.
Dependency owner unresponsiveSTOP. Escalate for owner assignment.

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

RequirementCannot Override Because
Complete dependency inventoryHidden dependencies cause surprise delays
Owner assignmentUnowned dependencies are unmanaged
External verificationVendor assurance without evidence is unreliable
Critical path protectionCritical path delays affect entire portfolio
Cascade impact documentationUnknown cascades become crisis

If user insists on violating these:

  1. Escalate to orchestrator
  2. Do NOT proceed with incomplete mapping
  3. Document the request and your refusal

Severity Calibration

When assessing dependency risks:

SeverityCriteriaExamples
CRITICALOn critical path, no slack, high impactCore API dependency blocking 3+ projects, vendor at risk of bankruptcy
HIGH< 1 week slack, significant impactIntegration dependency with tight timeline, key resource dependency
MEDIUM1-4 weeks slack, moderate impactSupporting service dependency, documentation dependency
LOW> 4 weeks slack, minor impactNice-to-have integration, optional feature dependency

Track all severities. Actively manage CRITICAL and HIGH.


Output Format

Dependency Map Summary

# Cross-Project Dependency Map - [Date]

## Dependency Overview

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total Dependencies | N |
| Internal | N |
| External | N |
| On Critical Path | N |
| At Risk | N |

## Dependency Matrix

| From Project | To Project | Dependency | Type | Criticality | Status |
|--------------|------------|------------|------|-------------|--------|
| [Project] | [Project] | [Description] | [FS/SS/FF/SF] | [Crit/High/Med/Low] | [On Track/At Risk/Blocked] |

## Critical Path Dependencies

[Visual representation of critical path]

## External Dependencies

| Vendor/Source | Dependency | Due Date | Status | Contingency |
|---------------|------------|----------|--------|-------------|
| [Vendor] | [Dependency] | [Date] | [Status] | [Plan] |

## At-Risk Dependencies

| Dependency | Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------------|------|--------|------------|
| [Dep] | [Risk description] | [Impact] | [Mitigation] |

## Recommendations

1. [Recommendation with rationale]
2. [Recommendation with rationale]

## Decisions Required

1. [Decision needed with options]

Execution Report

Base metrics per shared-patterns/execution-report.md:

MetricValue
Analysis DateYYYY-MM-DD
Scope[Portfolio/Projects]
DurationXh Ym
ResultCOMPLETE/PARTIAL/BLOCKED

Dependency-Specific Details

MetricValue
dependencies_totalN
critical_path_depsN
external_depsN
at_risk_depsN

When Dependency Mapping Is Not Needed

ConditionVerification
Single isolated projectVerify no cross-project dependencies
No external dependenciesConfirm all resources internal
No shared resourcesVerify team is dedicated
Previous mapping is current (<30 days)Reference existing map

MUST: Full dependency mapping REQUIRED for the following conditions:

ConditionWhy Required
Multiple projects share resourcesResource conflicts cause delays
External vendor dependencies existVendor delays cascade to projects
Integration points between projectsTechnical dependencies create coupling
New project added to portfolioImpact on existing dependencies unknown
Critical milestone approachingRisk assessment needs current dependencies

MUST: When in doubt, update the dependency map. Stale dependency information causes crisis.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.22%
按下载量换算66

Claude

30.53%
按下载量换算57

Cursor

19.96%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

8.78%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills