Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

writing-plans写作计划

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

210

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

118

下载量

73
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:writing-plans(写作计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rileyhilliard/claude-essentials
仓库路径:skills/writing-plans
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rileyhilliard/claude-essentials --skill writing-plans
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rileyhilliard/claude-essentials --skill writing-plans

简介

writing-plans 用于辅助文档结构和内容稿件整理,支持统一术语和章节规划。

  • 适用于 README、说明文和技术文档的撰写与优化场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 仓库安装,路径为 skills/writing-plans。
  • 使用时应保留项目已有事实,避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Writing Plans

Write step-by-step implementation plans for agentic execution. Each task should be a complete unit of work that one agent handles entirely.

Clarify ambiguity upfront: If the plan has unclear requirements or meaningful tradeoffs, use AskUserQuestion before writing the plan. Present options with descriptions explaining the tradeoffs. Use multiSelect: true for independent features that can be combined; use single-select for mutually exclusive choices. Don't guess when the user can clarify in 10 seconds.

Save to: **/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md

Plan Template

# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **Status:** DRAFT | APPROVED | IN_PROGRESS | COMPLETED

## Specification

**Problem:** [What's broken, missing, or needed. Describe the current state and why it's insufficient. Be specific enough that someone unfamiliar with the codebase understands the issue.]

**Goal:** [What the end state looks like after this work is done. Describe the user/developer experience, not the implementation.]

**Scope:** [What's in and what's out. Explicit boundaries prevent scope creep.]

**Success Criteria:**

- [ ] Criterion 1 (measurable/verifiable)
- [ ] Criterion 2

## Context Loading

_Run before starting:_

read src/relevant/file.ts glob src/feature/**/*.ts


## Tasks

### Task 1: [Complete Feature Unit]

**Context:** `src/auth/`, `tests/auth/`

**Steps:**

1. [ ] Create `src/auth/login.ts` with authentication logic
2. [ ] Add tests in `tests/auth/login.test.ts`
3. [ ] Export from `src/auth/index.ts`

**Verify:** `npm test -- tests/auth/`

---

### Task 2: [Another Complete Unit]

**Context:** `src/billing/`

**Steps:**

1. [ ] ...

**Verify:** `npm test -- tests/billing/`

Task Sizing

A task includes everything to complete one logical unit:

  • Implementation + tests + types + exports
  • All steps a single agent should do together

Right-sized: "Add user authentication" - one agent does model, service, tests, types Wrong: Separate tasks for model, service, tests - these should be one task

Bundle trivial items: Group small related changes (add export, update config, rename) into one task.

Parallelization & Grouping

During execution, tasks are grouped by subsystem to share agent context. Structure your plan to make grouping clear:

## Authentication Tasks ← These will run in one agent

### Task 1: Add login

### Task 2: Add logout

## Billing Tasks ← These will run in another agent (parallel)

### Task 3: Add billing API

### Task 4: Add webhooks

## Integration Tasks ← Sequential (depends on above)

### Task 5: Wire auth + billing

Execution model:

  • Tasks under same ## heading → grouped into one agent
  • Groups touching different subsystems → run in parallel
  • Max 3-4 tasks per group (split larger sections)

Tasks in the same subsystem should be sequential or combined into one task.

Rules

  1. Explicit paths: Say "create src/utils/helpers.ts" not "create a utility"
  2. Context per task: List files the agent should read first
  3. Verify every task: End with a command that proves it works
  4. One agent per task: All steps in a task are handled by the same agent

Before Presenting

Before presenting the plan to the user, dispatch the ce:devils-advocate agent via Task tool to review it:

  • Pass the full drafted plan text to the agent
  • Load relevant domain skills based on what the plan involves. Evaluate which of these apply and include them in the agent prompt:

- Skill(ce:architecting-systems) - system design, module boundaries, dependencies - Skill(ce:managing-databases) - database schemas, queries, migrations - Skill(ce:handling-errors) - error handling patterns - Skill(ce:writing-tests) - test strategy and quality - Skill(ce:migrating-code) - code migrations, API versioning - Skill(ce:optimizing-performance) - performance-sensitive work - Skill(ce:refactoring-code) - structural refactoring

  • The agent will look for: unstated assumptions, missing edge cases, tasks that are too vague, missing dependencies between tasks, verification gaps
  • Incorporate valid feedback into the plan
  • Note what the review caught in a brief "Review notes" comment at the bottom of the plan

Skip this step only if the plan is trivial (< 3 tasks, single subsystem, no architectural decisions).

Large Plans

For plans over ~500 lines, split into phases in a folder:

**/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-feature/
├── README.md           # Overview + phase tracking
├── phase-1-setup.md
└── phase-2-feature.md

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算26

Claude

31.5%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

20.1%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills