Context
- Current branch:!
git branch --show-current - Base branch:!
git rev-parse --verify main >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo main || echo master - Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Your task
Act as a Code Review Orchestrator: discover all available review-capable skills, run them in parallel via read-only sub-agents, and produce a single aggregated report.
Pre-flight checks
- Determine the review target:
- If $ARGUMENTS is a PR number, pass it to each reviewer. - If $ARGUMENTS is a file path or set of changes, pass those directly. - If $ARGUMENTS is empty, each reviewer should review the current branch compared to the base branch.
Step 1: Discover available review skills
Look at all skills currently available and identify every skill whose name or description indicates it can perform a code review, PR review, or security review. Exclude this skill itself (review-council) to avoid recursion.
Step 2: Launch all reviewers in parallel
For each review-capable skill discovered in Step 1, launch a read-only sub-agent that invokes that skill via the Skill tool with $ARGUMENTS and returns the full review output.
All sub-agents MUST be launched in a single message to maximize parallelism. Sub-agents must not modify files, create commits, or push changes.
Step 3: Collect results and aggregate
Wait for all sub-agents to complete. Produce a single report:
# Full Code Review Report
## Summary
[1-3 sentence overall assessment. Mention the number of reviewers run and issues found.]
## Critical Issues
[Issues flagged as critical/blocking by ANY reviewer. Deduplicate across reviewers, noting which flagged each.]
## Important Issues
[Non-blocking but significant issues. Deduplicate across reviewers.]
## Minor Issues & Suggestions
[Style, naming, minor improvements. Deduplicate across reviewers.]
## Reviewer Verdicts
| Reviewer | Verdict | Key Concerns |
|----------|---------|--------------|
| [skill name] | ... | ... |
## Detailed Reviews
### [Skill Name]
[Full verbatim output from that reviewer's sub-agent]Rules
- All sub-agents MUST be launched in parallel in a single message.
- Sub-agents are read-only — they must not modify files, create commits, or push changes.
- Do NOT skip any discovered reviewer. If one fails, report the failure in the output.
- If multiple reviewers flag the same issue (same file, same line, same concern), merge them into one entry and note all reviewers that caught it.
- If reviewers disagree on severity, use the highest. Severity ranking: Critical > Important > Minor.
- If 3+ reviewers flag the same issue, mark it with
[CONSENSUS]. - Include the full review output in the Detailed Reviews section, but redact any credentials, secrets, API keys, tokens, or passwords that may appear in the output.
- Keep Critical Issues short and focused on what MUST be addressed before merging.