Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

revenue-attribution收入归属

Agent Skill

revenue-attribution 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,097

周安装

84

GitHub Stars

85

下载量

679
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:revenue-attribution(收入归属)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/revenue-attribution
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill revenue-attribution
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill revenue-attribution

简介

revenue-attribution 用于查找、检索和筛选收入归因模型或营销效果分析相关资料。

  • 适用于市场营销、数据分析或商业智能领域中评估渠道贡献的场景。
  • 通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库添加技能。
  • 使用前应确认权限范围和维护状态,警惕是否触发数据访问或隐私信息处理。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Revenue Attribution

Determine which marketing and sales activities drive revenue using multi-touch attribution models, enabling smarter budget allocation and campaign optimization.

When to Use This Skill

  • Justifying marketing spend to leadership
  • Optimizing channel mix allocation
  • Evaluating campaign ROI
  • Resolving marketing/sales credit disputes
  • Building attribution reports

Methodology Foundation

Based on Bizible/Marketo Multi-Touch Attribution and Google Analytics Attribution Models, covering:

  • First-touch attribution (awareness credit)
  • Last-touch attribution (conversion credit)
  • Linear attribution (equal credit)
  • Time-decay attribution (recency-weighted)
  • Position-based (U-shaped, W-shaped)

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Explains attribution modelsWhich model fits your business
Calculates credit distributionHow to act on insights
Identifies top-performing channelsBudget reallocation amounts
Shows model comparisonFinal attribution policy
Highlights discrepanciesException handling

What This Skill Does

  1. Model education - Explain different attribution approaches
  2. Credit calculation - Apply models to touchpoint data
  3. Channel analysis - Compare performance by source
  4. Model comparison - Show how results differ by model
  5. Optimization recommendations - Where to invest more/less

How to Use

Analyze attribution for this closed-won deal:

Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $[Amount]
Close Date: [Date]
Sales Cycle: [Days]

Touchpoint Journey:
1. [Date] - [Channel] - [Action]
2. [Date] - [Channel] - [Action]
...
[List all touchpoints chronologically]

Questions:
- Which channels deserve credit?
- Compare first-touch vs last-touch
- Recommend budget allocation

Instructions

Step 1: Understand Attribution Models

ModelLogicBest For
First-Touch100% to first interactionAwareness measurement
Last-Touch100% to final conversionDirect response
LinearEqual split across allLong consideration cycles
Time-DecayMore credit to recentSales-assisted journeys
Position-Based40/20/40 (first/middle/last)Balanced view
W-Shaped30/30/30 + 10 remainderInclude MQL moment

Step 2: Map the Customer Journey

Document all touchpoints with:

  • Timestamp - When it occurred
  • Channel - Source (Paid, Organic, Email, Event, etc.)
  • Action - What happened (visit, download, demo, etc.)
  • Stage - Awareness, Consideration, Decision

Step 3: Apply Attribution Model

First-Touch Example:

Journey: Paid Search → Email → Webinar → Demo → Close
Revenue: $50,000

First-Touch Attribution:
- Paid Search: $50,000 (100%)
- All others: $0

Linear Example:

Same journey, 4 touchpoints:
- Paid Search: $12,500 (25%)
- Email: $12,500 (25%)
- Webinar: $12,500 (25%)
- Demo: $12,500 (25%)

Position-Based (40/20/40):

- Paid Search: $20,000 (40% - first)
- Email: $5,000 (10% - middle)
- Webinar: $5,000 (10% - middle)
- Demo: $20,000 (40% - last)

Step 4: Aggregate by Channel

Sum attribution across all deals to see total channel contribution:

Channel Performance (Position-Based):
- Paid Search: $500K attributed (35%)
- Events: $300K attributed (21%)
- Organic: $280K attributed (19%)
- Email: $220K attributed (15%)
- Referral: $150K attributed (10%)

Step 5: Calculate ROI by Channel

Channel ROI = Attributed Revenue / Channel Spend

Example:
- Paid Search: $500K revenue / $100K spend = 5x ROI
- Events: $300K revenue / $200K spend = 1.5x ROI

Examples

Example 1: Deal-Level Attribution

Input:

Analyze attribution for TechStart Inc:

Deal: TechStart Inc
Value: $75,000 ARR
Close Date: March 15
Sales Cycle: 62 days

Touchpoint Journey:
1. Jan 12 - Google Ads - Clicked ad, visited pricing
2. Jan 15 - Organic Search - Blog post read
3. Jan 22 - LinkedIn Ad - Whitepaper download (MQL)
4. Feb 1 - Email nurture - Opened 3 emails
5. Feb 10 - Webinar - Attended "Product Demo Day"
6. Feb 18 - Direct - Requested demo (SQL)
7. Mar 5 - Sales - Discovery call
8. Mar 12 - Sales - Proposal review
9. Mar 15 - Direct - Signed contract

Compare first-touch, last-touch, and position-based.

Output:

## Attribution Analysis: TechStart Inc ($75,000)

### Journey Summary
- **Total Touchpoints**: 9
- **Marketing Touchpoints**: 6 (Jan 12 - Feb 18)
- **Sales Touchpoints**: 3 (Mar 5 - Mar 15)
- **Sales Cycle**: 62 days
- **Key Conversion**: LinkedIn whitepaper (MQL), Demo request (SQL)

### Model Comparison

| Channel | First-Touch | Last-Touch | Position-Based | Linear |
|---------|-------------|------------|----------------|--------|
| Google Ads | $75,000 | $0 | $22,500 | $8,333 |
| Organic Search | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| LinkedIn Ads | $0 | $0 | $7,500 | $8,333 |
| Email | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| Webinar | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| Direct (Demo) | $0 | $0 | $7,500 | $8,333 |
| Sales | $0 | $75,000 | $26,250 | $25,000 |

### Position-Based Breakdown (Recommended)

**First Touch (30%): $22,500**
- Google Ads gets full first-touch credit
- Drove initial awareness and pricing interest

**MQL Touch (30%): $22,500**
- LinkedIn Ads: $15,000 (whitepaper = MQL)
- Webinar: $7,500 (influenced SQL)

**Last Touch (30%): $22,500**
- Demo Request: $7,500
- Sales (Close): $15,000

**Middle Touches (10%): $7,500**
- Organic: $2,500
- Email: $2,500
- Other: $2,500

### Insights

1. **Google Ads** initiated the journey - valuable for awareness
2. **LinkedIn Ads** drove the MQL - critical conversion point
3. **Sales** closed but didn't initiate - last-touch overstates
4. **Email** nurtured but didn't convert alone - assist role

### Channel Recommendations

| Channel | Attribution | Action |
|---------|-------------|--------|
| Google Ads | High first-touch | Maintain/increase for awareness |
| LinkedIn Ads | High MQL driver | Invest more for lead gen |
| Webinar | Solid influence | Continue as mid-funnel |
| Email | Assist role | Optimize, don't cut |

Example 2: Multi-Deal Channel Analysis

Input:

Analyze Q1 attribution across these closed deals:

Deal 1: $50K - Google Ads → Email → Demo → Close
Deal 2: $30K - Event → LinkedIn → Demo → Close
Deal 3: $80K - Referral → Demo → Close
Deal 4: $45K - Organic → Webinar → Email → Demo → Close
Deal 5: $25K - Google Ads → Event → Demo → Close

Total Q1 Revenue: $230K

Channel Spend:
- Google Ads: $15K
- Events: $25K
- LinkedIn: $8K
- Email: $3K
- Webinar: $5K
- Referral: $0

Which channels should we invest more in?

Output:

## Q1 Channel Attribution Analysis

### Total Revenue: $230,000

### Attribution by Model

#### Position-Based Attribution (40/20/40)

| Channel | First | Middle | Last | Total | % of Rev |
|---------|-------|--------|------|-------|----------|
| Google Ads | $30,000 | $2,500 | $0 | $32,500 | 14% |
| Events | $12,000 | $5,000 | $0 | $17,000 | 7% |
| LinkedIn | $0 | $6,000 | $0 | $6,000 | 3% |
| Email | $0 | $11,000 | $0 | $11,000 | 5% |
| Webinar | $0 | $9,000 | $0 | $9,000 | 4% |
| Referral | $32,000 | $0 | $0 | $32,000 | 14% |
| Demo | $0 | $0 | $30,500 | $30,500 | 13% |
| Sales/Close | $0 | $0 | $92,000 | $92,000 | 40% |

### ROI Analysis

| Channel | Attributed Rev | Spend | ROI |
|---------|----------------|-------|-----|
| Referral | $32,000 | $0 | ∞ (Best) |
| Google Ads | $32,500 | $15,000 | 2.2x |
| Webinar | $9,000 | $5,000 | 1.8x |
| LinkedIn | $6,000 | $8,000 | 0.75x |
| Events | $17,000 | $25,000 | 0.68x |
| Email | $11,000 | $3,000 | 3.7x |

### Efficiency Ranking

1. **🥇 Referral** - $0 cost, $32K attributed → Infinite ROI
2. **🥈 Email** - 3.7x ROI → High-value nurture
3. **🥉 Google Ads** - 2.2x ROI → Profitable acquisition
4. **Webinar** - 1.8x ROI → Solid mid-funnel
5. **LinkedIn** - 0.75x ROI → Below break-even
6. **Events** - 0.68x ROI → Expensive for return

### Recommendations

**Increase Investment:**
- **Referral Program**: 14% of revenue at $0 cost
  - Formalize referral rewards
  - Target: 2x referral deals in Q2

- **Email Nurture**: 3.7x ROI
  - Expand sequences
  - Add $2K budget for tools

- **Google Ads**: 2.2x ROI
  - Profitable, test 20% budget increase
  - Focus on high-intent keywords

**Optimize/Test:**
- **LinkedIn**: 0.75x is below target
  - Test new audiences before cutting
  - Could be essential for certain segments

**Reduce/Reallocate:**
- **Events**: $25K for $17K attributed
  - Evaluate which events drive pipeline
  - Consider smaller, targeted events
  - Reallocate $10K to Google Ads

### Proposed Q2 Budget Shift

| Channel | Q1 Spend | Q2 Proposed | Change |
|---------|----------|-------------|--------|
| Google Ads | $15K | $20K | +$5K |
| Events | $25K | $15K | -$10K |
| LinkedIn | $8K | $8K | — |
| Email | $3K | $5K | +$2K |
| Webinar | $5K | $6K | +$1K |
| Referral | $0 | $2K (rewards) | +$2K |
| **Total** | **$56K** | **$56K** | Rebalanced |

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Explaining attribution model mechanics
  • Calculating credit across touchpoints
  • Comparing models side-by-side
  • Identifying channel efficiency

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access actual CRM/analytics data
  • Track offline touchpoints automatically
  • Account for brand lift effects
  • Prove causation (only correlation)

When to Escalate to Human

  • Choosing official attribution model for company
  • Budget allocation decisions over $50K
  • Complex B2B journeys with multiple stakeholders
  • Reconciling attribution across systems

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "How would results change with time-decay model?"
  • "What if we excluded sales touchpoints?"
  • "Show me channel performance by deal size."
  • "Build attribution for all Q1 deals (I'll provide data)."

Attribution Maturity

  1. Basic: Last-touch only
  2. Intermediate: First and last comparison
  3. Advanced: Position-based or custom
  4. Expert: ML-based algorithmic attribution

Checklists & Templates

Attribution Report Template

## Attribution Report: [Period]

### Summary
- Total Revenue: $X
- Deals Analyzed: X
- Model Used: [Position-Based]

### Channel Attribution
| Channel | Revenue | % | ROI |
|---------|---------|---|-----|

### Top Insights
1.
2.
3.

### Budget Recommendations
| Channel | Current | Recommended | Rationale |
|---------|---------|-------------|-----------|

Touchpoint Tracking Checklist

  • UTM parameters on all campaigns
  • CRM synced with marketing automation
  • Offline events logged manually
  • Sales activities timestamped
  • Content downloads tracked

References

  • Bizible Multi-Touch Attribution Guide
  • Google Analytics Attribution Modeling
  • Forrester B2B Attribution Research
  • Marketo Revenue Cycle Analytics

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Predict revenue by source
  • lead-scoring - Score by attributed channel
  • ad-spend-optimizer - Automate budget shifts

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min for analysis
  • Prerequisites: Touchpoint data, deal values, channel spend

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.7%
按下载量换算242

Claude

29.58%
按下载量换算201

Cursor

19.73%
按下载量换算134

Gemini CLI

10.7%
按下载量换算73

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills