Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

reasoning-orchestrator推理协调器

Agent Skill

reasoning-orchestrator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

376

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

6

下载量

132
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:reasoning-orchestrator(推理协调器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/andurilcode/skills
仓库路径:skills/reasoning-orchestrator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/andurilcode/skills --skill reasoning-orchestrator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/andurilcode/skills --skill reasoning-orchestrator

简介

reasoning-orchestrator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 当前顶部介绍为空,原始 SKILL.md 摘录未提供。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Reasoning Orchestrator

CRITICAL: This skill does NOT perform any reasoning itself. It plans and delegates. All reasoning is done by reading and applying individual skill files, or by spawning subagents. Do not shortcut by reasoning inline.


How to Execute This Skill

Follow these steps exactly, in order. Do not skip steps. Do not collapse steps.


STEP 1 — Triage (do this yourself, no skill file needed)

Classify the situation across these dimensions and write the classification out loud before proceeding:

Temporal direction: Forward-looking / Present-state / Backward-looking

Problem maturity:

  • Unframed — the problem itself may not be correctly defined
  • Framed, unsolved — problem understood, solution not found
  • Solved, needs validation — solution exists, needs stress-testing
  • Decided, needs learning — something happened, extract signal

Primary obstacle:

  • Don't understand the system → diagnostic track
  • Understand it, stuck on solutions → generative track
  • Have solutions, need to choose → convergence track
  • Something went wrong → retrospective track
  • About to commit to something → adversarial track
  • Don't know what we don't know → epistemic track
  • Incentives are misaligned / need to design rules → strategic track

Domain complexity (if unclear, assign unknown and include cynefin-framework in Step 2):

  • Clear / Complicated / Complex / Chaotic / Unknown

Write the triage output in this format before moving to Step 2:

TRIAGE
Temporal: [forward / present / backward]
Maturity: [label]
Obstacle: [label] → [track]
Domain: [label]

STEP 2 — Build the Execution Plan (do this yourself, no skill file needed)

Using the triage output and the routing table below, produce a numbered execution plan. Label each step as SEQUENTIAL or PARALLEL. Do not execute anything yet.

Routing table — entry points by obstacle:

ObstacleExecution plan
Don't know what we're dealing withPARALLEL: epistemic-mapping ∥ cynefin-framework ∥ cognitive-bias-detection → re-triage
Don't understand the system / why it's failingPARALLEL: systems-thinking ∥ theory-of-constraints ∥ causal-inference → SEQUENTIAL: five-whys-root-cause → decision-synthesis
Don't understand the system / strategic agents involvedPARALLEL: systems-thinking ∥ game-theoretic-analysis ∥ causal-inference → SEQUENTIAL: five-whys-root-cause → decision-synthesis
Plan / design needs validationPARALLEL: inversion-premortem ∥ red-teaming ∥ second-order-thinking → SEQUENTIAL: cognitive-bias-detection → decision-synthesis
Stuck, all solutions feel the sameSEQUENTIAL: epistemic-mapping → PARALLEL: lateral-thinking ∥ analogical-thinking ∥ first-principles-thinking → SEQUENTIAL: inversion-premortem → decision-synthesis
Need to decide between optionsPARALLEL: scenario-planning ∥ probabilistic-thinking ∥ fermi-estimation → decision-synthesis
Something went wrong / post-mortemSEQUENTIAL: retrospective-counterfactual → PARALLEL: five-whys-root-cause ∥ causal-inference → SEQUENTIAL: cognitive-bias-detection
Long-term strategic commitmentPARALLEL: epistemic-mapping ∥ cognitive-bias-detection ∥ cynefin-framework → PARALLEL: scenario-planning ∥ probabilistic-thinking ∥ fermi-estimation → PARALLEL: inversion-premortem ∥ red-teaming ∥ second-order-thinking → PARALLEL: stakeholder-power-mapping ∥ game-theoretic-analysis → decision-synthesis
Blocked / people won't adoptPARALLEL: stakeholder-power-mapping ∥ game-theoretic-analysis ∥ second-order-thinking ∥ causal-inference → decision-synthesis
Incentives misaligned / need to design rulesSEQUENTIAL: game-theoretic-analysis → PARALLEL: second-order-thinking ∥ red-teaming → SEQUENTIAL: stakeholder-power-mapping → decision-synthesis

Write the plan in this format:

EXECUTION PLAN
Step 1 — PARALLEL: [skill-a] ∥ [skill-b] ∥ [skill-c]
Step 2 — SEQUENTIAL: [skill-d]
Step 3 — PARALLEL: [skill-e] ∥ [skill-f]
Step 4 — SEQUENTIAL: [skill-g]

STEP 3 — Execute the Plan (step by step, never all at once)

Work through the execution plan one step at a time. For each step:

For a SEQUENTIAL step:

  1. Read the skill file: view: skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md
  2. Apply the skill to the current problem context, following the methodology in that file exactly
  3. Write the output in the skill's output format
  4. Write the routing decision: STEP [N] COMPLETE — SEQUENTIAL: [skill-name] Key finding: [1–2 sentences] Routing to Step [N+1]: [reason based on finding]
  5. Proceed to the next step

For a PARALLEL step:

  1. Spawn one subagent per skill using the Task tool. Each subagent receives:

- The full problem description - Any findings from prior sequential steps - This instruction: *"Read skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md then apply that skill's full methodology to the problem. Output your findings in that skill's output format. Do not perform other reasoning."*

  1. Wait for all subagents to complete
  2. Synthesize their outputs: SYNTHESIS — Step [N] PARALLEL: [skill-a] ∥ [skill-b] ∥ [skill-c] Convergent findings (2+ skills agree — higher confidence): - [finding] Divergent findings (1 skill only — worth noting): - [finding] (from [skill]) Contradictions (skills disagree — resolve before proceeding): - [skill-a] says [X], [skill-b] says [Y] → resolution: [...] Key inputs for Step [N+1]: [what the next step needs]
  3. Proceed to the next step

STEP 4 — Terminate

Stop when any of these conditions are met:

  • decision-synthesis has completed and produced a decision with acceptable confidence
  • The problem is understood well enough to act without further analysis
  • If 4+ steps have run without converging: stop, flag the problem as likely unframed, restart from Step 1 with epistemic-mapping as the only entry point

Write the termination output:

CHAIN COMPLETE
Steps executed: [list with SEQUENTIAL/PARALLEL labels]
Key finding: [1–2 sentences]
Recommended action: [what to do now]

Parallelization Reference

These five clusters are the canonical parallel groups. Skills within a cluster apply independent lenses and never depend on each other's output.

PatternSkillsUse when
P1 — Adversarialinversion-premortem ∥ red-teaming ∥ second-order-thinkingValidating a plan before commitment
P2 — Generativelateral-thinking ∥ analogical-thinking ∥ first-principles-thinkingStuck, need new options
P3 — Diagnosticsystems-thinking ∥ theory-of-constraints ∥ causal-inferenceSystem is failing, need to understand why
P4 — Uncertaintyscenario-planning ∥ probabilistic-thinking ∥ fermi-estimationDecision needs quantification
P5 — Meta-cognitiveepistemic-mapping ∥ cognitive-bias-detection ∥ cynefin-frameworkClean the reasoning environment first
P6 — Strategicgame-theoretic-analysis ∥ stakeholder-power-mapping ∥ second-order-thinkingMultiple agents with competing incentives

Post-Step Routing Reference

After completing any step, use this table to adjust the plan if findings warrant it:

Completed skillFindingAdjust plan to include
epistemic-mappingDangerous assumptions foundfirst-principles-thinking (sequential, next)
cynefin-frameworkDomain = Complexlateral-thinking ∥ scenario-planning (parallel) instead of structured analysis
cynefin-frameworkDomain = ChaoticAct immediately; retrospective-counterfactual after stabilization
stakeholder-power-mappingStrategic agents with conflicting incentivesgame-theoretic-analysis (sequential)
game-theoretic-analysisNash Equilibrium ≠ Pareto OptimumMechanism design needed — decision-synthesis with design constraints
game-theoretic-analysisInformation asymmetry identifiedred-teaming on exploitability (sequential)
game-theoretic-analysisRepeated game dynamicssecond-order-thinking on reputation effects (sequential)
systems-thinkingBottleneck identifiedtheory-of-constraints (sequential)
five-whys-root-causeRoot cause is causal claimcausal-inference (sequential)
five-whys-root-causeMultiple root causesdecision-synthesis (sequential, to prioritize)
adversarial panel (P1)High-severity riskscognitive-bias-detection on the risk analysis (sequential)
generative panel (P2)All options weakepistemic-mapping — frame may be wrong (sequential, restart)
uncertainty panel (P4)High uncertainty persistsinversion-premortem on worst-case scenario (sequential)
decision-synthesisKey assumption too uncertainepistemic-mapping → validate before committing
retrospective-counterfactualSystemic cause foundsystems-thinking ∥ five-whys-root-cause (parallel)

Skill Registry

SkillFile pathParallelizes with
epistemic-mappingskills/epistemic-mapping/SKILL.mdcynefin-framework, cognitive-bias-detection
cynefin-frameworkskills/cynefin-framework/SKILL.mdepistemic-mapping, cognitive-bias-detection
systems-thinkingskills/systems-thinking/SKILL.mdtheory-of-constraints, causal-inference
theory-of-constraintsskills/theory-of-constraints/SKILL.mdsystems-thinking, causal-inference
five-whys-root-causeskills/five-whys-root-cause/SKILL.mdcausal-inference
causal-inferenceskills/causal-inference/SKILL.mdsystems-thinking, five-whys-root-cause
cognitive-bias-detectionskills/cognitive-bias-detection/SKILL.mdepistemic-mapping, cynefin-framework
inversion-premortemskills/inversion-premortem/SKILL.mdred-teaming, second-order-thinking
red-teamingskills/red-teaming/SKILL.mdinversion-premortem, second-order-thinking
second-order-thinkingskills/second-order-thinking/SKILL.mdinversion-premortem, red-teaming
probabilistic-thinkingskills/probabilistic-thinking/SKILL.mdscenario-planning, fermi-estimation
fermi-estimationskills/fermi-estimation/SKILL.mdprobabilistic-thinking, scenario-planning
scenario-planningskills/scenario-planning/SKILL.mdprobabilistic-thinking, fermi-estimation
stakeholder-power-mappingskills/stakeholder-power-mapping/SKILL.mdsecond-order-thinking, causal-inference, game-theoretic-analysis
game-theoretic-analysisskills/game-theoretic-analysis/SKILL.mdstakeholder-power-mapping, second-order-thinking, causal-inference
lateral-thinkingskills/lateral-thinking/SKILL.mdanalogical-thinking, first-principles-thinking
analogical-thinkingskills/analogical-thinking/SKILL.mdlateral-thinking, first-principles-thinking
first-principles-thinkingskills/first-principles-thinking/SKILL.mdlateral-thinking, analogical-thinking
decision-synthesisskills/decision-synthesis/SKILL.mdruns after all others
retrospective-counterfactualskills/retrospective-counterfactual/SKILL.mdfive-whys-root-cause, causal-inference

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.19%
按下载量换算45

Claude

29.1%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

19.16%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

8.4%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/andurilcode/skills --skill reasoning-orchestrator 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills