Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

qe-shift-left-testingqe 左移测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,091

周安装

45

GitHub Stars

329

下载量

356
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qe-shift-left-testing(qe 左移测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/qe-shift-left-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-shift-left-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-shift-left-testing

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。qe-shift-left-testing 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑,区分模拟与生产环境。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应明确本地模拟与测试环境边界。

SKILL.md

Shift-Left Testing

<default_to_action> When implementing early testing practices:

  1. VALIDATE requirements before coding (testability, BDD scenarios)
  2. WRITE tests before implementation (TDD red-green-refactor)
  3. AUTOMATE in CI pipeline (every commit triggers tests)
  4. FOLLOW test pyramid: Many unit (70%), some integration (20%), few E2E (10%)
  5. FIX defects immediately - never let them accumulate

Quick Shift-Left Levels:

  • Level 1: Unit tests with each PR (developer responsibility)
  • Level 2: TDD practice (tests before code)
  • Level 3: BDD/Example mapping in refinement (requirements testing)
  • Level 4: Risk analysis in design (architecture testing)

Critical Success Factors:

  • Defects found in requirements cost 1x; in production cost 100x
  • Every commit must run automated tests
  • Quality is built in, not tested in </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Reducing cost of defects
  • Implementing CI/CD pipelines
  • Starting TDD practice
  • Improving requirements quality

Cost of Defects by Phase

PhaseRelative CostExample
Requirements1xFix doc: 30 min
Design5xRedesign: few hours
Development10xCode fix: 1 day
Testing20xFix + retest: 2 days
Production100xHotfix + rollback + investigation

Test Pyramid

       /\        E2E (10%) - Critical user journeys
      /  \
     /    \      Integration (20%) - Component interactions
    /      \
   /________\    Unit (70%) - Fast, isolated, comprehensive

Shift-Left Levels

LevelPracticeWhen
1Unit tests in PRBefore merge
2TDDBefore implementation
3BDD/Example MappingDuring refinement
4Risk AnalysisDuring design

Level 1: Tests in Every PR

# CI pipeline - tests run on every commit
name: CI
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run test:unit
      - run: npm run test:integration
      - run: npm run lint

  quality-gate:
    needs: test
    steps:
      - name: Coverage Check
        run: npx coverage-check --min 80
      - name: No New Warnings
        run: npm run lint -- --max-warnings 0

Level 2: TDD Practice

// Red: Write failing test first
test('calculates discount for orders over $100', () => {
  const order = new Order([{ price: 150 }]);
  expect(order.discount).toBe(15); // 10% off
});

// Green: Minimal implementation
class Order {
  get discount() {
    return this.total > 100 ? this.total * 0.1 : 0;
  }
}

// Refactor: Improve while keeping green

Level 3: BDD in Refinement

# Example mapping before coding
Feature: Loyalty Discount
  Scenario: Gold member gets 15% discount
    Given a customer with "gold" membership
    When they checkout with $200 in cart
    Then discount applied is $30
    And order total is $170

  Scenario: New customer gets no discount
    Given a customer with no membership
    When they checkout with $200 in cart
    Then no discount is applied

Level 4: Risk Analysis in Design

// During architecture review
await Task("Risk Analysis", {
  phase: 'design',
  component: 'payment-service',
  questions: [
    'What happens when payment gateway times out?',
    'How do we handle duplicate submissions?',
    'What if inventory changed during checkout?'
  ]
}, "qe-requirements-validator");

// Output: Testability requirements, failure mode tests

Agent-Assisted Shift-Left

// Validate requirements testability
await Task("Requirements Validation", {
  requirements: userStories,
  check: ['INVEST-criteria', 'testability', 'ambiguity'],
  generateBDD: true
}, "qe-requirements-validator");

// Generate tests from requirements
await Task("Generate Tests", {
  source: 'requirements',
  types: ['unit', 'integration', 'e2e'],
  coverage: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-test-generator");

// Smart test selection for changes
await Task("Select Regression Tests", {
  changedFiles: prFiles,
  algorithm: 'risk-based',
  targetReduction: 0.7  // 70% time savings
}, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/shift-left/
├── requirements/*       - Validated requirements
├── generated-tests/*    - Auto-generated tests
├── coverage-targets/*   - Coverage goals by component
└── pipeline-results/*   - CI/CD test history

Fleet Coordination

const shiftLeftFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'shift-left',
  agents: [
    'qe-requirements-validator',     // Level 3-4
    'qe-test-generator',             // Level 2
    'qe-regression-risk-analyzer'    // Smart selection
  ],
  topology: 'sequential'
});

Related Skills


Remember

Earlier = Cheaper. Requirements defects cost 1x; production defects cost 100x. Test pyramid: 70% unit, 20% integration, 10% E2E. Every commit runs tests. TDD builds quality in.

With Agents: Agents validate requirements testability, generate tests from specs, and select optimal regression suites. Use agents to implement shift-left practices consistently.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.73%
按下载量换算134

Claude

30.2%
按下载量换算108

Cursor

18.52%
按下载量换算66

Gemini CLI

10.34%
按下载量换算37

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills