Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

qe-performance-testingqe 性能测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,080

周安装

45

GitHub Stars

329

下载量

360
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qe-performance-testing(qe 性能测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/qe-performance-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-performance-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-performance-testing

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据日志定位问题。
  • 使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。qe-performance-testing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑,区分模拟与生产环境。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应明确本地模拟与测试环境边界。

SKILL.md

Performance Testing

<default_to_action> When testing performance or planning load tests:

  1. DEFINE SLOs: p95 response time, throughput, error rate targets
  2. IDENTIFY critical paths: revenue flows, high-traffic pages, key APIs
  3. CREATE realistic scenarios: user journeys, think time, varied data
  4. EXECUTE with monitoring: CPU, memory, DB queries, network
  5. ANALYZE bottlenecks and fix before production

Quick Test Type Selection:

  • Expected load validation → Load testing
  • Find breaking point → Stress testing
  • Sudden traffic spike → Spike testing
  • Memory leaks, resource exhaustion → Endurance/soak testing
  • Horizontal/vertical scaling → Scalability testing

Critical Success Factors:

  • Performance is a feature, not an afterthought
  • Test early and often, not just before release
  • Focus on user-impacting bottlenecks </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Before major releases
  • After infrastructure changes
  • Before scaling events (Black Friday)
  • When setting SLAs/SLOs

Test Types

TypePurposeWhen
LoadExpected trafficEvery release
StressBeyond capacityQuarterly
SpikeSudden surgeBefore events
EnduranceMemory leaksAfter code changes
ScalabilityScaling validationInfrastructure changes

Key Metrics

MetricTargetWhy
p95 response< 200msUser experience
Throughput10k req/minCapacity
Error rate< 0.1%Reliability
CPU< 70%Headroom
Memory< 80%Stability

Tools

  • k6: Modern, JS-based, CI/CD friendly
  • JMeter: Enterprise, feature-rich
  • Artillery: Simple YAML configs
  • Gatling: Scala, great reporting

Agent Coordination

  • qe-performance-tester: Load test orchestration
  • qe-quality-analyzer: Results analysis
  • qe-production-intelligence: Production comparison

Defining SLOs

Bad: "The system should be fast" Good: "p95 response time < 200ms under 1,000 concurrent users"

export const options = {
  thresholds: {
    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],  // 95% < 200ms
    http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],     // < 1% failures
  },
};

Realistic Scenarios

Bad: Every user hits homepage repeatedly Good: Model actual user behavior

// Realistic distribution
// 40% browse, 30% search, 20% details, 10% checkout
export default function () {
  const action = Math.random();
  if (action < 0.4) browse();
  else if (action < 0.7) search();
  else if (action < 0.9) viewProduct();
  else checkout();

  sleep(randomInt(1, 5)); // Think time
}

Common Bottlenecks

Database

Symptoms: Slow queries under load, connection pool exhaustion Fixes: Add indexes, optimize N+1 queries, increase pool size, read replicas

N+1 Queries

// BAD: 100 orders = 101 queries
const orders = await Order.findAll();
for (const order of orders) {
  const customer = await Customer.findById(order.customerId);
}

// GOOD: 1 query
const orders = await Order.findAll({ include: [Customer] });

Synchronous Processing

Problem: Blocking operations in request path (sending email during checkout) Fix: Use message queues, process async, return immediately

Memory Leaks

Detection: Endurance testing, memory profiling Common causes: Event listeners not cleaned, caches without eviction

External Dependencies

Solutions: Aggressive timeouts, circuit breakers, caching, graceful degradation


k6 CI/CD Example

// performance-test.js
import http from 'k6/http';
import { check, sleep } from 'k6';

export const options = {
  stages: [
    { duration: '1m', target: 50 },   // Ramp up
    { duration: '3m', target: 50 },   // Steady
    { duration: '1m', target: 0 },    // Ramp down
  ],
  thresholds: {
    http_req_duration: ['p(95)<200'],
    http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01'],
  },
};

export default function () {
  const res = http.get('https://api.example.com/products');
  check(res, {
    'status is 200': (r) => r.status === 200,
    'response time < 200ms': (r) => r.timings.duration < 200,
  });
  sleep(1);
}
# GitHub Actions
- name: Run k6 test
  uses: grafana/k6-action@v0.3.0
  with:
    filename: performance-test.js

Analyzing Results

Good Results

Load: 1,000 users | p95: 180ms | Throughput: 5,000 req/s
Error rate: 0.05% | CPU: 65% | Memory: 70%

Problems

Load: 1,000 users | p95: 3,500ms ❌ | Throughput: 500 req/s ❌
Error rate: 5% ❌ | CPU: 95% ❌ | Memory: 90% ❌

Root Cause Analysis

  1. Correlate metrics: When response time spikes, what changes?
  2. Check logs: Errors, warnings, slow queries
  3. Profile code: Where is time spent?
  4. Monitor resources: CPU, memory, disk
  5. Trace requests: End-to-end flow

Anti-Patterns

❌ Anti-Pattern✅ Better
Testing too lateTest early and often
Unrealistic scenariosModel real user behavior
0 to 1000 users instantlyRamp up gradually
No monitoring during testsMonitor everything
No baselineEstablish and track trends
One-time testingContinuous performance testing

Agent-Assisted Performance Testing

// Comprehensive load test
await Task("Load Test", {
  target: 'https://api.example.com',
  scenarios: {
    checkout: { vus: 100, duration: '5m' },
    search: { vus: 200, duration: '5m' },
    browse: { vus: 500, duration: '5m' }
  },
  thresholds: {
    'http_req_duration': ['p(95)<200'],
    'http_req_failed': ['rate<0.01']
  }
}, "qe-performance-tester");

// Bottleneck analysis
await Task("Analyze Bottlenecks", {
  testResults: perfTest,
  metrics: ['cpu', 'memory', 'db_queries', 'network']
}, "qe-performance-tester");

// CI integration
await Task("CI Performance Gate", {
  mode: 'smoke',
  duration: '1m',
  vus: 10,
  failOn: { 'p95_response_time': 300, 'error_rate': 0.01 }
}, "qe-performance-tester");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/performance/
├── results/*       - Test execution results
├── baselines/*     - Performance baselines
├── bottlenecks/*   - Identified bottlenecks
└── trends/*        - Historical trends

Fleet Coordination

const perfFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'performance-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-performance-tester',
    'qe-quality-analyzer',
    'qe-production-intelligence',
    'qe-deployment-readiness'
  ],
  topology: 'sequential'
});

Pre-Production Checklist

  • Load test passed (expected traffic)
  • Stress test passed (2-3x expected)
  • Spike test passed (sudden surge)
  • Endurance test passed (24+ hours)
  • Database indexes in place
  • Caching configured
  • Monitoring and alerting set up
  • Performance baseline established

Related Skills


Remember

Performance is a feature: Test it like functionality Test continuously: Not just before launch Monitor production: Synthetic + real user monitoring Fix what matters: Focus on user-impacting bottlenecks Trend over time: Catch degradation early

With Agents: Agents automate load testing, analyze bottlenecks, and compare with production. Use agents to maintain performance at scale.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.32%
按下载量换算124

Claude

27.09%
按下载量换算98

Cursor

19.41%
按下载量换算70

Gemini CLI

9.33%
按下载量换算34

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills