Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

py-code-healthpy 代码健康状况

Agent Skill

py-code-health 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

353

周安装

15

GitHub Stars

27

下载量

124
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:py-code-health(py 代码健康状况)
来源仓库:https://github.com/l-mb/python-refactoring-skills
仓库路径:skills/py-code-health
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/l-mb/python-refactoring-skills --skill py-code-health
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/l-mb/python-refactoring-skills --skill py-code-health

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词和任务场景快速定位候选结果。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中处理信息搜索类任务时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件操作。
  • 涉及敏感操作时应注意运行环境隔离和数据保护。

SKILL.md

Python Code Health Maintenance

Remove dead code and consolidate duplication to keep codebase clean and maintainable.

Objectives

  1. Detect unused code (functions, classes, variables)
  2. Find and remove dead code with high confidence
  3. Identify duplicate code across files
  4. Consolidate similar code into parametrized functions
  5. Remove redundant imports and commented-out code

Required Tools

Add to [dependency-groups] dev: "vulture", "pylint"

  • vulture: AST-based dead code detection
  • pylint: Duplicate code detection

Permissions: Run py-quality-setup first to configure .claude/settings.local.json with all needed tool permissions.

Dead Code Detection

Find Unused Code

# Using vulture (primary tool)
vulture .                              # Find all unused code
vulture . --min-confidence 80          # High confidence only
vulture . --min-confidence 80 --sort-by-size  # Largest dead code first
vulture . --exclude=tests/,venv/,.venv/ # Exclude directories

# Generate report
vulture . --min-confidence 80 > dead_code_report.txt

Interpret Vulture Output

unused function 'calculate_tax' (80% confidence)
src/billing.py:45

unused class 'LegacyProcessor' (90% confidence)
src/processors.py:123

unused variable 'debug_mode' (60% confidence)
src/config.py:12

Confidence levels:

  • 60-70%: May be false positive (dynamic imports, metaclasses, etc.)
  • 80-89%: Likely unused, verify before removing
  • 90-100%: Almost certainly unused

Handle False Positives

Vulture may flag code that's actually used:

1. Dynamic imports/calls:

# Flagged as unused but called dynamically
def plugin_handler():
    pass

# Called via: getattr(module, 'plugin_handler')()

2. Framework conventions:

# Django models - fields used by ORM
class User(models.Model):
    email = models.EmailField()  # May be flagged but used by Django

3. Public API:

# Part of library's public API, used by external code
def public_function():
    pass

Solutions:

  • Add to whitelist file: vulture. whitelist.py
  • Add comment: # pragma: no cover or custom marker
  • Accept false positives for public APIs
  1. Code that *should* be used, but isn't:

For example, constants, magic numbers, type definitions, or even functions may appear unused. But this may in fact be the issue! (Consider partial refactoring, or other causes.)

Before eliminating apparently dead code, validate that no similar patterns that should reference it exist. If they do, instead fix the call/use sites.

Remove Dead Code

# BEFORE - Unused functions cluttering codebase
def old_calculate_price(item):  # Last used 2 years ago
    return item.cost * 1.1

def deprecated_handler(data):  # Replaced by new_handler
    pass

# AFTER - Clean, only active code remains
# (Dead code completely removed)

Duplicate Code Detection

Find Duplicates

# Using pylint (detects similar code blocks)
pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code --recursive=y .

# Configure minimum similar lines (default: 4)
pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code --duplicate-code-min-lines=6 --recursive=y .

# JSON output for parsing
pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code --output-format=json --recursive=y . > duplication.json

Interpret Pylint Output

Similar lines in 2 files
src/auth.py:45-60
src/admin.py:123-138

def validate_credentials(username, password):
    if not username or not password:
        return False
    user = db.get_user(username)
    if not user:
        return False
    return check_password(password, user.password_hash)

Consolidation Patterns

Parametrize Similar Functions

# BEFORE - Duplicate code with slight variations
def process_user(data: dict) -> User:
    if not data.get("email"):
        raise ValueError("Missing email")
    if not data.get("name"):
        raise ValueError("Missing name")
    return User(email=data["email"], name=data["name"])

def process_admin(data: dict) -> Admin:
    if not data.get("email"):
        raise ValueError("Missing email")
    if not data.get("name"):
        raise ValueError("Missing name")
    return Admin(email=data["email"], name=data["name"])

# AFTER - Single parametrized function
T = TypeVar('T', User, Admin)

def process_entity(data: dict, entity_class: type[T]) -> T:
    if not data.get("email"):
        raise ValueError("Missing email")
    if not data.get("name"):
        raise ValueError("Missing name")
    return entity_class(email=data["email"], name=data["name"])

# Usage
user = process_entity(data, User)
admin = process_entity(data, Admin)

Extract Common Logic

# BEFORE - Duplicated validation in multiple functions
def create_user(email: str, age: int) -> User:
    if not email or "@" not in email:
        raise ValueError("Invalid email")
    if age < 0 or age > 150:
        raise ValueError("Invalid age")
    return User(email=email, age=age)

def update_user(user_id: int, email: str, age: int) -> User:
    if not email or "@" not in email:
        raise ValueError("Invalid email")
    if age < 0 or age > 150:
        raise ValueError("Invalid age")
    user = get_user(user_id)
    user.email = email
    user.age = age
    return user

# AFTER - Extract common validation
def validate_email(email: str) -> None:
    if not email or "@" not in email:
        raise ValueError("Invalid email")

def validate_age(age: int) -> None:
    if age < 0 or age > 150:
        raise ValueError("Invalid age")

def create_user(email: str, age: int) -> User:
    validate_email(email)
    validate_age(age)
    return User(email=email, age=age)

def update_user(user_id: int, email: str, age: int) -> User:
    validate_email(email)
    validate_age(age)
    user = get_user(user_id)
    user.email = email
    user.age = age
    return user

Use Configuration Over Duplication

# BEFORE - Similar handlers with different values
def process_csv_file(path: str) -> list:
    return parse_file(path, delimiter=",", encoding="utf-8", skip_header=True)

def process_tsv_file(path: str) -> list:
    return parse_file(path, delimiter="\t", encoding="utf-8", skip_header=True)

def process_psv_file(path: str) -> list:
    return parse_file(path, delimiter="|", encoding="utf-8", skip_header=True)

# AFTER - Configuration-driven
FILE_CONFIGS = {
    "csv": {"delimiter": ",", "encoding": "utf-8", "skip_header": True},
    "tsv": {"delimiter": "\t", "encoding": "utf-8", "skip_header": True},
    "psv": {"delimiter": "|", "encoding": "utf-8", "skip_header": True},
}

def process_file(path: str, file_type: str) -> list:
    config = FILE_CONFIGS[file_type]
    return parse_file(path, **config)

Remove Commented Code

Commented-out code is a form of dead code:

# BEFORE - Cluttered with old code
def calculate_total(items: list) -> float:
    # Old implementation - kept for reference
    # total = 0
    # for item in items:
    #     total += item.price * item.quantity
    # return total

    # Another old version
    # return sum(item.price * item.quantity for item in items)

    # Current implementation
    return sum(item.total_price() for item in items)

# AFTER - Clean, rely on git history
def calculate_total(items: list) -> float:
    return sum(item.total_price() for item in items)

Rationale: Git history preserves old implementations. Commented code creates noise.

Verification Checklist

  • vulture. --min-confidence 80 reports no dead code (or only accepted false positives)
  • pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code reports no duplicate blocks >6 lines
  • No commented-out code blocks remain
  • All tests pass after removals
  • Code coverage maintained or improved
  • Whitelist file created for intentional false positives (if needed)

Examples

Example: Code health cleanup workflow

1. Scan: vulture . --min-confidence 80; pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code --recursive=y .
2. Found: 5 unused functions (67 lines), 3 duplicate blocks (45 lines)
3. Remove: Verify unused code with Explore agent, delete confirmed dead code
4. Consolidate: Extract duplicates to shared utilities
5. Result: -112 lines total, tests pass, coverage improved to 86%

Example: Handle false positives

1. Scan: vulture . --min-confidence 80
2. Found: public_api_function flagged as unused (actually part of library API)
3. Create whitelist.py with: public_api_function  # Used by external consumers
4. Re-scan: vulture . whitelist.py --min-confidence 80
5. Result: False positive suppressed, real dead code still detected

Example: Consolidate duplicate validation

1. Scan: pylint --disable=all --enable=duplicate-code --recursive=y .
2. Found: Same validation logic in create_user() and update_user()
3. Extract: Create validate_user_data() helper function
4. Update: Both functions now call validate_user_data()
5. Result: -15 lines, single source of truth for validation

Related Skills

  • Prerequisites: py-quality-setup (tool configuration), py-test-quality (safety net before removing code)
  • Next steps: py-complexity (reduce complexity after cleanup)
  • See also: py-security (check security before major changes)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.92%
按下载量换算48

Claude

28.78%
按下载量换算36

Cursor

18.55%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9.3%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills