Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

proposalproposal 搜索

Agent Skill

proposal 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,963

周安装

411

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,255
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:proposal(proposal 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/depinhq/proposal
安装命令:
openclaw skills install proposal
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install proposal

简介

设计、构建和改进销售、服务、合作与战略提案的专业工具。

  • 适用于准备客户提案、竞标文件或合作伙伴关系开发等商务场景。
  • 根据任务需求生成定制化提案框架和内容建议。proposal 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用时需明确目标受众和项目细节,确保输出符合实际业务需求。
  • 安装前应核实是否涉及外部 API 调用或文档生成权限。

SKILL.md

name
proposal
description
>

Proposal

A proposal is not just a document.

A proposal is a decision tool.

Most weak proposals fail for the same reason: they explain what will be done, but not why it matters, why this approach fits, what outcome is being bought, what risks are reduced, or what decision should happen next.

A good proposal reduces hesitation by making the value, structure, and choice clearer.

This skill helps turn vague offers into persuasive, usable proposals.

Trigger Conditions

Use this skill when the user needs to:

  • create a proposal for a client, customer, partner, or stakeholder
  • structure an offer after discovery or intake
  • present scope, pricing, terms, and timeline clearly
  • improve proposal win rate
  • turn a service idea into a decision-ready document
  • compare proposal options or packaging
  • rewrite a weak or confusing proposal
  • align a proposal with the buyer's goals and constraints

Also trigger when the user says things like:

  • "Help me write a proposal"
  • "I need to send an offer"
  • "How should I structure this proposal"
  • "Turn this into a client proposal"
  • "Why is my proposal not converting"
  • "I need pricing and scope explained clearly"

Core Principle

A proposal should make the buyer feel:

  • understood
  • confident
  • clear on what happens next

The proposal is not mainly about your service. It is about the buyer's problem, the promised outcome, the logic of the solution, the boundaries of the work, and the terms under which a decision feels safe.

What This Skill Does

This skill helps:

  • translate discovery into a structured offer
  • define the problem, outcome, and proposed approach
  • clarify scope, timeline, pricing, assumptions, and boundaries
  • improve proposal logic and persuasiveness
  • reduce ambiguity that creates delay or mistrust
  • structure options when helpful
  • move the reader toward a decision rather than passive review

Default Outputs

Depending on the request, produce one or more of the following:

  1. Proposal Draft

A full proposal with sections, flow, and buyer-facing language.

  1. Proposal Structure

An outline showing what sections should exist and why.

  1. Offer Framing

A clearer articulation of problem, value, outcome, and fit.

  1. Scope and Pricing Model

A structured explanation of deliverables, assumptions, options, and fees.

  1. Proposal Audit

A diagnosis of why an existing proposal feels weak, unclear, or low-converting.

  1. Decision Version

A simplified proposal optimized for quick stakeholder review and approval.

Response Rules

When responding:

  • start from the buyer's goals, not the seller's features
  • define the problem before presenting the solution
  • connect deliverables to outcomes
  • make scope and exclusions explicit
  • reduce ambiguity around timeline, pricing, and responsibility
  • use options only when they clarify rather than confuse
  • distinguish confidence from hype
  • end with a clear decision path

Proposal Architecture

~~~python PROPOSAL_ARCHITECTURE = { "core_elements": { "context": "What the buyer is dealing with and why this matters now", "goal": "What outcome the buyer wants", "approach": "How the proposed work addresses the goal", "scope": "What is included and what is not", "timeline": "When major steps and outcomes happen", "pricing": "How the work is priced and why", "terms": "What assumptions, responsibilities, and conditions apply", "decision_path": "What the buyer should do next" }, "guiding_questions": [ "What problem is the buyer trying to solve", "Why now", "What does success look like", "Why this approach over alternatives", "What uncertainty could block approval", "What part of the proposal is most likely to create hesitation" ] } ~~~

Proposal Workflow

~~~python PROPOSAL_WORKFLOW = { "step_1_extract_buying_context": { "purpose": "Clarify what decision the proposal is supporting", "outputs": [ "buyer goal", "pain point", "urgency", "stakeholders", "constraints" ] }, "step_2_define_offer": { "purpose": "Translate need into a concrete solution shape", "outputs": [ "recommended approach", "deliverables", "work phases", "client responsibilities", "assumptions" ] }, "step_3_define_boundaries": { "purpose": "Prevent later ambiguity", "outputs": [ "included items", "excluded items", "change logic", "approval points", "dependency risks" ] }, "step_4_price_and_package": { "purpose": "Present the commercial logic clearly", "outputs": [ "fee structure", "payment terms", "option tiers if useful", "rationale for pricing" ] }, "step_5_reduce_friction": { "purpose": "Address what may slow or block a yes", "methods": [ "clarify process", "remove jargon", "answer obvious objections", "make next steps simple", "show credibility without overloading" ] }, "step_6_close_cleanly": { "purpose": "Make the decision path explicit", "outputs": [ "decision options", "acceptance step", "timeline to start", "what happens after approval" ] } } ~~~

Common Proposal Types

~~~python PROPOSAL_TYPES = { "service_proposal": { "use_when": "Selling a defined service engagement", "focus": ["problem", "scope", "timeline", "pricing", "deliverables", "working model"] }, "project_proposal": { "use_when": "Proposing a project with phases and milestones", "focus": ["objectives", "phases", "dependencies", "ownership", "success criteria"] }, "partnership_proposal": { "use_when": "Exploring a strategic or commercial collaboration", "focus": ["shared value", "roles", "economics", "coordination model", "risk"] }, "internal_proposal": { "use_when": "Seeking approval from internal stakeholders", "focus": ["business case", "cost", "impact", "tradeoffs", "decision ask"] }, "retainer_proposal": { "use_when": "Structuring ongoing work over time", "focus": ["scope rhythm", "capacity", "reporting", "responsiveness", "renewal logic"] } } ~~~

Proposal Logic

~~~python PROPOSAL_LOGIC = { "principles": [ "The buyer cares more about outcome than activity", "Specificity builds confidence", "Unclear scope creates slow decisions", "Every proposal implies a risk allocation", "The document should match the buyer's attention span and decision style", "More pages do not equal more persuasion" ], "common_failures": [ "Too much about the seller", "No clear problem framing", "Deliverables disconnected from business value", "Scope hidden in vague language", "Pricing presented without logic", "No clear call to decision", "Trying to impress instead of clarify" ], "corrections": [ "Lead with the buyer's objective", "Show why the approach fits", "Tie work to outcomes and constraints", "Define scope and exclusions clearly", "Make decision steps obvious", "Reduce unnecessary complexity" ] } ~~~

Proposal Output Format

Proposal Summary

  • Buyer or Stakeholder:
  • Goal:
  • Problem or Opportunity:
  • Recommended Approach:
  • Scope:
  • Timeline:
  • Pricing or Commercial Structure:
  • Key Assumptions:
  • Risks or Open Questions:
  • Recommended Next Step:

Boundaries

This skill helps structure and improve proposals, offers, and decision documents.

It does not replace legal, tax, financial, procurement, or contract advice. For regulated, high-value, or high-risk deals, outputs should be reviewed against the user's jurisdiction, internal policies, and formal agreements.

Quality Check Before Delivering

  • [ ] The buyer's goal is clearly stated
  • [ ] The proposal explains why this approach fits
  • [ ] Scope and exclusions are explicit
  • [ ] Timeline and pricing are understandable
  • [ ] Assumptions and responsibilities are visible
  • [ ] The proposal supports a decision, not just a read-through
  • [ ] The next step is concrete

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

72%
按下载量换算2,344

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills