Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

project-test-loop项目测试循环

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

1,469

周安装

60

GitHub Stars

28

下载量

470
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:project-test-loop(项目测试循环)
来源仓库:https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/project-test-loop
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill project-test-loop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill project-test-loop

简介

project-test-loop 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证,适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。

  • 适用于软件开发中的测试覆盖提升和问题排查场景。
  • 支持生成测试计划、检查测试框架配置并与现有代码集成。
  • 使用时应确认项目测试框架类型(如 Jest、Pytest)及运行命令格式。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时需区分本地模拟与生产环境,避免误改真实逻辑。

SKILL.md

Run automated TDD cycle: test → fix → refactor.

Note: Configure project-specific test/build commands in CLAUDE.md or .claude/rules/ for automatic detection.

Steps:

  1. Detect test command (if not already configured):

- Check package.json for scripts.test (Node.js) - Check for pytest or python -m unittest (Python) - Check for cargo test (Rust) - Check for go test./... (Go) - Check Makefile for test target - If not found, ask user how to run tests

  1. Run test suite: # Run detected test command [test_command]
  2. Analyze results: If tests FAIL: If tests PASS:

- Parse failure output - Identify failing tests: - Which tests failed? - What assertions failed? - What was expected vs actual? - Identify root cause: - Bug in implementation? - Missing implementation? - Incorrect test? - Make minimal fix: - Fix only what's needed to pass the failing test - Don't add extra functionality - Don't fix tests (fix code instead) - Re-run tests to confirm fix - Loop back to step 2 - Check for refactoring opportunities: - Code duplication? - Unclear naming? - Long functions? - Complex logic that can be simplified? - Magic numbers/strings to extract? - If refactoring identified: - Refactor while keeping tests green - Re-run tests after each refactoring - Ensure tests still pass - If no refactoring needed: - Report success - Stop loop

  1. Repeat until: OR stop if:

- All tests pass AND - No obvious refactoring opportunities - User intervention needed - Blocked by external dependency - Unclear how to fix failure

  1. Report results: 🧪 Test Loop Results: Cycles: [N] iterations Fixes Applied: - [Fix 1]: [Brief description] - [Fix 2]: [Brief description] Refactorings Performed: - [Refactor 1]: [Brief description] - [Refactor 2]: [Brief description] Current Status: ✅ All tests pass ✅ Code refactored 📝 Ready for commit OR ⚠️ Blocked: [Reason] 📝 Next steps: [Recommendation]

TDD Cycle Details:

RED Phase (If starting new feature)

  1. Write failing test describing desired behavior
  2. Run tests → Should FAIL (expected)
  3. This command picks up from here

GREEN Phase (This command handles)

  1. Run tests
  2. If fail → Make minimal fix
  3. Re-run tests → Should PASS
  4. Loop until all pass

REFACTOR Phase (This command handles)

  1. Tests pass
  2. Look for improvements
  3. Refactor
  4. Re-run tests → Should STILL PASS
  5. Loop until no improvements

Common Failure Patterns:

Pattern: Missing Implementation

  • Symptom: undefined is not a function, NameError, etc.
  • Fix: Implement the missing function/class/method
  • Minimal: Just the signature, return dummy value

Pattern: Wrong Return Value

  • Symptom: Expected X but got Y
  • Fix: Update implementation to return correct value
  • Minimal: Don't add extra logic, just fix the return

Pattern: Missing Edge Case

  • Symptom: Test fails for specific input
  • Fix: Handle the edge case
  • Minimal: Add condition for this case only

Pattern: Integration Issue

  • Symptom: Test fails when components interact
  • Fix: Fix the integration point
  • Minimal: Fix just the integration, not entire components

Refactoring Opportunities:

Look for:

  • Duplicated code → Extract to function
  • Magic numbers → Extract to constants
  • Long functions → Break into smaller functions
  • Complex conditionals → Extract to well-named functions
  • Unclear names → Rename to be descriptive
  • Comments explaining code → Refactor code to be self-explanatory

Don't:

  • Change behavior
  • Add new functionality
  • Skip test runs
  • Make tests pass by changing tests

Auto-Stop Conditions:

Stop and report if:

  • All tests pass + no refactoring needed (SUCCESS)
  • Same test fails 3 times in a row (STUCK)
  • Error in test command itself (TEST SETUP ISSUE)
  • External dependency unavailable (BLOCKED)
  • Unclear how to fix (NEEDS USER INPUT)

Integration with Blueprint Development:

This command applies project-specific skills:

  • Testing strategies: Knows how to structure tests
  • Implementation guides: Knows how to implement fixes
  • Quality standards: Knows what to refactor
  • Architecture patterns: Knows where code should go

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.57%
按下载量换算172

Claude

28.63%
按下载量换算135

Cursor

18.95%
按下载量换算89

Gemini CLI

7.97%
按下载量换算37

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills