Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

programmatic-seo-plannerprogrammatic SEO planner 搜索

Agent Skill

programmatic-seo-planner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

242

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

607

下载量

79
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:programmatic-seo-planner(programmatic SEO planner 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/programmatic-seo-planner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-planner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill programmatic-seo-planner

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 支持基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息筛选与整理。
  • 通过 npx 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。
  • 安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • programmatic-seo-planner 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Programmatic SEO Page Planner

Programmatic SEO is how startups generate hundreds of high-intent pages from templates — "{Your Product} vs {Competitor}", "Best {Category} for {Industry}", "{Integration} + {Your Product}". This skill figures out which patterns are worth building, designs the templates, and prioritizes the buildout.

Core principle: pSEO isn't about spinning content. It's about finding a data axis (something that varies per page) where each variation has real search demand and your product has a genuine answer. This skill validates both before you invest in building.

When to Use

  • "How do we scale SEO pages without writing each one manually?"
  • "Should we build vs/ comparison pages?"
  • "What programmatic SEO patterns work for SaaS?"
  • "How can we rank for hundreds of long-tail keywords?"
  • "Plan our pSEO strategy"

Tool Enhancement (Optional)

This skill works with existing capabilities but produces significantly better results when paired with a keyword data API for bulk volume lookups across hundreds of long-tail variations.

Agent Prompt to User

"I can plan your programmatic SEO strategy using our existing tools. However, for the best results — especially accurate search volume data across hundreds of keyword variations — I'd recommend connecting a keyword data API." Recommended: DataForSEO (pay-per-use, ~$0.01/keyword, no monthly minimum) - Sign up at dataforseo.com → get API login + password - Set DATAFORSEO_LOGIN and DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD env vars Alternatives that also work: - Keywords Everywhere API ($1 per 10 credits = 100K keywords, very cheap) → set KEYWORDS_EVERYWHERE_API_KEY - SEMrush API (if you have a subscription) → set SEMRUSH_API_KEY - Ahrefs API (if you have a subscription) → set AHREFS_API_TOKEN "Want to use one of these, or should I proceed with baseline mode? Baseline still works — I'll use our Apify-based SEO tools for top-level data, though volume estimates for individual long-tail patterns will be less precise."

Mode Selection

  • Enhanced mode — Bulk keyword volume lookups via DataForSEO / Keywords Everywhere / SEMrush / Ahrefs. Gets exact monthly search volume, keyword difficulty, and CPC for each pattern variation. Enables confident prioritization.
  • Baseline mode — Uses seo-domain-analyzer (Apify) for domain-level metrics and web_search for pattern validation. Volume estimates are directional, not exact. Still produces a solid blueprint — just less granular on per-variation demand.

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product — URL + one-sentence description
  2. Category — What category/market do you play in?
  3. Competitors — 3-5 competitor URLs (we'll analyze their pSEO plays)
  4. ICP — Who's searching for your product? (roles, industries, company stages)
  5. Existing content — Do you already have a blog/resource section? (URL if yes)
  6. CMS/tech stack — What powers your site? (Webflow, WordPress, Next.js, etc.) — informs template feasibility
  7. Tool preference — Enhanced mode with keyword API, or baseline? (see Tool Enhancement above)

Phase 1: Pattern Discovery

1A: Competitor pSEO Analysis

Run site-content-catalog for each competitor:

python3 skills/site-content-catalog/scripts/catalog_content.py \
  --url "<competitor_url>" \
  --output json

Analyze URL structures for programmatic patterns:

  • /vs/, /compare/, /alternatives/ — Comparison pages
  • /integrations/, /connect/, /apps/ — Integration pages
  • /for-{industry}/, /solutions/, /use-cases/ — Vertical/use-case pages
  • /templates/, /examples/, /glossary/ — Resource pages
  • /tools/, /calculators/, /generators/ — Tool pages

For each pattern found, note:

  • URL pattern (regex)
  • Estimated page count
  • What varies per page (the "data axis")
  • Sample page titles

1B: Market Pattern Mapping

Based on your product category, evaluate these standard pSEO pattern types:

Pattern TypeURL StructureData AxisBest For
Versus/Comparison/vs/{competitor}Competitor namesHigh-intent, bottom-funnel
Alternatives/alternatives/{competitor}Competitor namesDisplacement queries
Integrations/integrations/{tool}Tool/app namesMid-funnel, ecosystem
Industry verticals/for/{industry}Industry namesVertical targeting
Use cases/use-cases/{use-case}Job-to-be-doneMid-funnel, discovery
Glossary/Definitions/glossary/{term}Industry termsTop-funnel, authority
Templates/Examples/templates/{type}Template typesMid-funnel, utility
Tools/Calculators/tools/{tool-name}Tool functionsTop-funnel, link bait
Location pages/{service}-in-{city}City/region namesLocal-intent (if relevant)

1C: Customer Language Mining

Run reddit-post-finder to find how ICP talks about the problem:

python3 skills/reddit-post-finder/scripts/search_reddit.py \
  --subreddit "<relevant_subs>" \
  --keywords "<category>,<problem keyword>" \
  --days 365 --sort top --time year

Extract:

  • Questions people ask → potential glossary/guide patterns
  • "How do I [X] with [tool]?" → integration/use-case patterns
  • "Is there a [X] for [industry]?" → vertical page patterns
  • Comparison discussions → vs/ page patterns

1D: Keyword Volume Validation

Enhanced mode (DataForSEO / Keywords Everywhere / SEMrush / Ahrefs):

For each candidate pattern, generate 20-50 keyword variations and pull exact volumes:

  • "your-product vs {competitor1}", "your-product vs {competitor2}", etc.
  • "best {category} for {industry1}", "best {category} for {industry2}", etc.
  • "{your-product} {integration1} integration", etc.

Aggregate per pattern type:

  • Total addressable monthly searches across all variations
  • Average volume per variation
  • Volume distribution (are a few variations high-volume or is it evenly spread?)
  • Average keyword difficulty

Baseline mode:

Use seo-domain-analyzer for competitor domain metrics, web_search to spot-check if key variations have SERP results (indicating real demand), and manual estimation based on:

  • Competitor page count per pattern (more pages = likely more demand)
  • Google autocomplete suggestions for pattern variations
  • Reddit/community question frequency

Phase 2: Pattern Evaluation

Score each candidate pattern on:

FactorWeightHow to Assess
Search demand30%Total addressable volume across all variations
Intent quality25%How close to purchase decision? (vs/ = high, glossary = low)
Template feasibility20%Can you create a useful, differentiated page from a template?
Data availability15%Can you programmatically source the data that varies?
Competitive gap10%Are competitors NOT doing this pattern, or doing it poorly?

Score each pattern 0-100. Rank by score.

Feasibility Check Per Pattern

For each pattern scoring 50+, validate:

  1. Data source — Where does the variable data come from?

- Competitor names → manual list (finite, high-value) - Integration/tool names → API marketplace, app directory - Industry names → standard industry lists - Terms/glossary → keyword research output - Templates → product feature matrix

  1. Content differentiation — Can each page offer genuine value, or will they be thin?

- vs/ pages need real feature comparisons, not just "we're better" - Integration pages need actual setup guides or use cases - Vertical pages need industry-specific pain points and examples

  1. Technical feasibility — Can your CMS generate these at scale?

- Static site generators (Next.js, Astro) → excellent for pSEO - Webflow CMS → good, max 10K items per collection - WordPress → good with custom post types - Manual creation → not pSEO, just a lot of pages

Phase 3: Template Design

For each pattern being built, design:

Template Blueprint

## Pattern: [vs/{competitor}]

### URL Structure
/vs/{competitor-slug}

### Title Template
{Your Product} vs {Competitor} — [Year] Comparison | {Your Brand}

### Meta Description Template
Compare {Your Product} and {Competitor} side-by-side. See pricing, features,
pros/cons, and which is better for {ICP description}.

### H1
{Your Product} vs {Competitor}: Honest Comparison

### Page Sections (content framework)
1. **TL;DR** — 3-sentence summary of key differences (above fold)
2. **Quick comparison table** — Feature matrix with checkmarks
3. **Detailed comparison** — 4-6 key dimensions, 2-3 paragraphs each
4. **Pricing comparison** — Plan-by-plan breakdown
5. **Who should choose {Your Product}** — ICP fit description
6. **Who should choose {Competitor}** — Fair assessment
7. **What real users say** — Review quotes from both sides
8. **CTA** — Trial/demo prompt

### Data Required Per Page
- competitor_name: string
- competitor_slug: string
- competitor_features: array (from their website/docs)
- competitor_pricing: object (from pricing page)
- competitor_reviews: array (from G2/Capterra)
- your_differentiators: array (per competitor)

### Content Guidelines
- Minimum 1,500 words per page
- Must include at least one unique insight (not just feature lists)
- Use actual screenshots or diagrams where possible
- Update quarterly (pricing/features change)

Repeat for each pattern type.

Phase 4: Prioritization & Roadmap

Build the implementation plan:

Priority Matrix

PatternScoreEst. PagesVolume/PageTotal VolumeBuild EffortPriority
vs/ comparisons85153004,500MediumP0 — Build first
integrations/7240803,200HighP1 — Build second
for-{industry}/68122002,400MediumP1 — Build second
alternatives-to/6582502,000LowP0 — Quick win
glossary/45100404,000LowP2 — Authority play

Recommended Buildout Sequence

Month 1: Quick wins

  • Build [pattern A] — [X] pages, [rationale]
  • Build [pattern B] — [X] pages, [rationale]

Month 2: Scale

  • Build [pattern C] — [X] pages, [rationale]
  • Measure Month 1 patterns, iterate templates

Month 3: Expand

  • Build [pattern D] — [X] pages, [rationale]
  • Update Month 1 pages with performance data

Per-Pattern Data Source Plan

For each pattern, specify exactly where the variable data comes from:

  • Manual curation (competitors list — finite, high quality)
  • API source (integration marketplace)
  • Scraping (review sites, competitor pages)
  • Internal data (product features, pricing)

Phase 5: Output

# Programmatic SEO Blueprint — [Product Name] — [DATE]

## Executive Summary
- [N] patterns evaluated, [M] recommended for buildout
- Total addressable search volume: [X]/month
- Estimated pages to build: [Y]
- Recommended buildout timeline: [Z] months

---

## Pattern Analysis (ranked by priority)

### P0: [Pattern Name]
- URL structure: [pattern]
- Pages to build: [N]
- Total monthly volume: [X]
- Template blueprint: [see below]
- Data source: [where variable data comes from]
- Build effort: [Low/Medium/High]
- Expected time to rank: [2-4 months / 4-8 months / etc.]

[Full template blueprint per Phase 3]

### P1: [Pattern Name]
...

---

## Technical Requirements
- CMS: [capabilities needed]
- Data pipeline: [how to source variable data]
- Update cadence: [how often to refresh]

---

## Quick-Start Guide
1. Start with [pattern] — lowest effort, highest intent
2. Create [N] pages using the template above
3. Monitor for [X] weeks before expanding
4. ...

Save to the current working directory or wherever the user prefers.

Cost

ComponentCost
Site catalog per competitor (Apify)~$0.05-0.10
Reddit scraper~$0.05-0.10
SEO domain analyzer~$0.10-0.20
DataForSEO keyword lookups (enhanced)~$0.50-2.00 (depending on variation count)
Keywords Everywhere (enhanced alt)~$0.01-0.05
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Total (baseline)~$0.20-0.50
Total (enhanced)~$0.70-2.50

Tools Required

  • Apify API tokenAPIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skills: site-content-catalog, seo-domain-analyzer, reddit-post-finder
  • Optional (enhanced): DataForSEO (DATAFORSEO_LOGIN + DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD), Keywords Everywhere (KEYWORDS_EVERYWHERE_API_KEY), SEMrush (SEMRUSH_API_KEY), or Ahrefs (AHREFS_API_TOKEN)

Trigger Phrases

  • "Plan our programmatic SEO strategy"
  • "What pSEO pages should we build?"
  • "Design vs/ comparison pages for our product"
  • "How do we scale to hundreds of SEO pages?"
  • "Build a pSEO blueprint for [client]"
  • "What programmatic patterns should we use?"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36%
按下载量换算28

Claude

29.75%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

18.95%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

9.07%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills