Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

profiling-tables分析表

Agent Skill

profiling-tables 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

15,228

周安装

616

GitHub Stars

347

下载量

4,780
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:profiling-tables(分析表)
来源仓库:https://github.com/astronomer/agents
仓库路径:skills/profiling-tables
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/astronomer/agents --skill profiling-tables
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/astronomer/agents --skill profiling-tables

简介

通过结构化分析输出对数据库表进行全面的统计和质量分析。

  • 生成适合数据类型的列级统计信息:数字列的最小/最大/百分位数、字符串的长度指标、时间戳的日期范围
  • 执行基数分析以识别分类列与高基数列并检测偏态分布
  • 跨五个维度评估数据质量:完整性(NULL 率)、唯一性(重复)、新鲜度(更新时间戳)、有效性(范围/格式检查)和一致性(逻辑矛盾)
  • 输出结构化的配置文件,包括架构概述、关键统计数据、质量得分、已识别的问题以及为新团队成员推荐的后续查询

SKILL.md

Data Profile

Generate a comprehensive profile of a table that a new team member could use to understand the data.

Step 1: Basic Metadata

Query column metadata:

SELECT COLUMN_NAME, DATA_TYPE, COMMENT
FROM <database>.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = '<schema>' AND TABLE_NAME = '<table>'
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION

If the table name isn't fully qualified, search INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES to locate it first.

Step 2: Size and Shape

Run via run_sql:

SELECT
    COUNT(*) as total_rows,
    COUNT(*) / 1000000.0 as millions_of_rows
FROM <table>

Step 3: Column-Level Statistics

For each column, gather appropriate statistics based on data type:

Numeric Columns

SELECT
    MIN(column_name) as min_val,
    MAX(column_name) as max_val,
    AVG(column_name) as avg_val,
    STDDEV(column_name) as std_dev,
    PERCENTILE_CONT(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY column_name) as median,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count,
    COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>

String Columns

SELECT
    MIN(LEN(column_name)) as min_length,
    MAX(LEN(column_name)) as max_length,
    AVG(LEN(column_name)) as avg_length,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL OR column_name = '' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as empty_count,
    COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>

Date/Timestamp Columns

SELECT
    MIN(column_name) as earliest,
    MAX(column_name) as latest,
    DATEDIFF('day', MIN(column_name), MAX(column_name)) as date_range_days,
    SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count
FROM <table>

Step 4: Cardinality Analysis

For columns that look like categorical/dimension keys:

SELECT
    column_name,
    COUNT(*) as frequency,
    ROUND(COUNT(*) * 100.0 / SUM(COUNT(*)) OVER(), 2) as percentage
FROM <table>
GROUP BY column_name
ORDER BY frequency DESC
LIMIT 20

This reveals:

  • High-cardinality columns (likely IDs or unique values)
  • Low-cardinality columns (likely categories or status fields)
  • Skewed distributions (one value dominates)

Step 5: Sample Data

Get representative rows:

SELECT *
FROM <table>
LIMIT 10

If the table is large and you want variety, sample from different time periods or categories.

Step 6: Data Quality Assessment

Summarize quality across dimensions:

Completeness

  • Which columns have NULLs? What percentage?
  • Are NULLs expected or problematic?

Uniqueness

  • Does the apparent primary key have duplicates?
  • Are there unexpected duplicate rows?

Freshness

  • When was data last updated? (MAX of timestamp columns)
  • Is the update frequency as expected?

Validity

  • Are there values outside expected ranges?
  • Are there invalid formats (dates, emails, etc.)?
  • Are there orphaned foreign keys?

Consistency

  • Do related columns make sense together?
  • Are there logical contradictions?

Step 7: Output Summary

Provide a structured profile:

Overview

2-3 sentences describing what this table contains, who uses it, and how fresh it is.

Schema

ColumnTypeNulls%DistinctDescription
...............

Key Statistics

  • Row count: X
  • Date range: Y to Z
  • Last updated: timestamp

Data Quality Score

  • Completeness: X/10
  • Uniqueness: X/10
  • Freshness: X/10
  • Overall: X/10

Potential Issues

List any data quality concerns discovered.

Recommended Queries

3-5 useful queries for common questions about this data.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.78%
按下载量换算1,471

Cursor

22.81%
按下载量换算1,090

Codex

17.44%
按下载量换算834

OpenCode

10.78%
按下载量换算515

github-copilot

6.73%
按下载量换算322

Gemini CLI

3.03%
按下载量换算145

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills