- name
- prioritization-funnel
- description
- Evaluate and prioritize opportunities through a structured filtering process. Use for resource allocation, strategic decision support, and project management.
Prioritization Funnel
Metadata
- Name: prioritization-funnel
- Description: Structured opportunity filtering and prioritization
- Triggers: prioritization, resource allocation, opportunity filtering, project ranking
Instructions
Apply a multi-stage filtering process to prioritize opportunities or projects.
Framework
The Funnel Process
ALL OPPORTUNITIES (20-50 options)
│
STAGE 1: DEFINITION
↓ Apply 4 criteria filters
(Narrow to 20-30)
│
STAGE 2: RAPID APPRAISAL
↓ Quick evaluation on key dimensions
(Narrow to 5-15)
│
STAGE 3: FINANCIAL MODELLING
↓ Assess quantitative impact
(Narrow to 3-7)
│
STAGE 4: DECISION MAKING
↓ Strategic evaluation
(Select top 1-3)Stage 1: Definition Filters
| Criterion | Threshold | Pass Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic Fit | Must align | 60% pass |
| Market Size | Must exceed threshold | 50% pass |
| Required Investment | Within budget | 40% pass |
| Time Horizon | Meets window | 70% pass |
| Resource Availability | Feasible | 50% pass |
Result: [Opportunities passed to Stage 2]
Stage 2: Rapid Appraisal
| Dimension | Weight | Scale (1-5) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic Alignment | 30% | [High/Med/Low] | Fit with goals |
| Market Potential | 25% | [H/M/L] | Growth opportunity |
| Profitability Impact | 20% | [H/M/L] | NPV or margin |
| Implementation Ease | 15% | [Easy/Med/Hard] | Feasibility |
| Risk Level | 10% | [H/M/L] | Project risk |
| Score | [Calculated total] |
Result: [Opportunities passed to Stage 3]
Stage 3: Financial Modeling
| Opportunity | NPV | IRR | Payback | Sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Opportunity A] | $X M | Y% | Z years | Analysis |
| [Opportunity B] | $X M | Y% | Z years | Analysis |
Result: [Opportunities ranked for final decision]
Stage 4: Final Selection
| Rank | Opportunity | Total Score | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Opportunity Name] | [Score] | [Why #1?] |
| 2 | [Opportunity Name] | [Score] | [Why #2?] |
| 3 | [Opportunity Name] | [Score] | [Why #3?] |
Selected Opportunities
Priority 1: [Opportunity Name]
- Action: [Description]
- Owner: [Who's responsible]
- Timeline: [Start - completion]
- Budget: [Allocation]
Priority 2: [Opportunity Name]
- Action: [Description]
- Owner: [Who's responsible]
- Timeline: [Start - completion]
- Budget: [Allocation]
Priority 3: [Opportunity Name]
- Action: [Description]
- Owner: [Who's responsible]
- Timeline: [Start - completion]
- Budget: [Allocation]
Resource Allocation
| Priority | Allocated Capital | % of Budget | Personnel | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $X M | Y% | [Team lead] | Q1-Q2 |
| 2 | $Y M | Z% | [Team lead] | Q2-Q3 |
| 3 | $Z M | W% | [Team lead] | Q3-Q4 |
| Hold | $V M | V% | - | - |
Governance
Decision Authority: [Who has final approval] Approval Process: [Stage gate process] Review Timeline: [When to review priorities]
Monitoring
| Metric | Target | Actual | Variance | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of opportunities in funnel | 20 | 18 | 🔴 -10 | Reassess funnel |
| Average NPV of top 3 | $X M | $Y M | 🟢 +10% | Continue investment |
| Resource utilization | 90% | 75% | 🟡 -15% | Optimize capacity |
Funnel Metrics
| Stage | Input | Pass Rate | Cycle Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | 50 options | 60% | 1 week |
| Appraisal | 30 options | 50% | 2 days |
| Financial Modeling | 15 options | 33% | 1 week |
| Selection | 7 options | 100% | Decision made |
Strategic Implications
Portfolio Balance:
- [Analysis of opportunity mix]
Resource Constraints:
- [Budget constraint analysis]
- [Capacity constraint analysis]
- [Timeline constraint analysis]
Risk Factors:
- [Over-prioritizing quick wins]
- [Under-prioritizing strategic opportunities]
Tips
- Be transparent about scoring - make criteria explicit
- Use quantitative thresholds where possible
- Balance qualitative and quantitative factors
- Don't rush Stage 2 - financial modeling matters
- Consider resource constraints realistically
- Review funnel regularly - opportunities and conditions change
- Document decision rationale for accountability
- Use weighted scoring to reflect strategic priorities
References
- Various project management and portfolio management sources
- McKinsey, BCG project management frameworks
- PMI prioritization methods
- Stage-gate process best practices