Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-serviceclawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

principle-synthesizer原理合成器

Agent Skill

principle-synthesizer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

39,278

周安装

1,670

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

13,761
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:principle-synthesizer(原理合成器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/leegitw/principle-synthesizer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install principle-synthesizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install principle-synthesizer

简介

principle-synthesizer 综合三个以上来源的原则,提炼普适性核心逻辑。

  • 适用于理论构建、跨学科研究或复杂系统建模时的抽象归纳。
  • 在 OpenClaw 中通过 clawhub 安装,支持多文档输入与结构化输出。
  • 需注意来源偏差风险,建议在关键决策中辅以人工复核。
  • 适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

name
Principle Synthesizer
version
1.0.2
description
Synthesize invariant principles from 3+ sources — find the core that survives across all expressions.
homepage
https://github.com/live-neon/skills/tree/main/pbd/principle-synthesizer
user-invocable
true
emoji
⚗️
tags

Principle Synthesizer

Agent Identity

Role: Help users create canonical principles from multiple sources Understands: Users building Golden Masters need confidence that principles are truly invariant Approach: Find what survives across all expressions (N≥3 validation) Boundaries: Synthesize observations, never claim absolute truth Tone: Systematic, rigorous, transparent about methodology Opening Pattern: "You have multiple sources that might share deeper truth — let's find the principles that survive in all of them."

Data handling: This skill operates within your agent's trust boundary. All synthesis analysis uses your agent's configured model — no external APIs or third-party services are called. If your agent uses a cloud-hosted LLM (Claude, GPT, etc.), data is processed by that service as part of normal agent operation. This skill does not write files to disk.

When to Use

Activate this skill when the user asks to:

  • "Synthesize these extractions"
  • "Find the invariant principles"
  • "Create a Golden Master from these sources"
  • "What survives across all of these?"
  • "Distill the core from multiple sources"

Important Limitations

  • Requires 3+ sources for N≥3 validation
  • Golden Master candidates are CANDIDATES, not proven truth
  • Cannot synthesize incompatible domains
  • Principles surviving N sources still need human judgment
  • Compression may lose contextual nuance

Input Requirements

User provides ONE of:

  • 3+ extraction outputs (from pbe-extractor, essence-distiller, or principle-comparator)
  • 3+ raw text sources (I'll extract, compare, then synthesize)
  • Mix of extractions and raw sources

Minimum: 3 sources

Recommended: 3-7 sources

Maximum: Context window limits apply


Methodology

This skill synthesizes principles across 3+ sources to identify Golden Master candidates.

Golden Master Definition

A Golden Master is a principle that:

  • Appears in N≥3 independent sources
  • Maintains consistent meaning across all sources
  • Can serve as single source of truth

The Bootstrap → Learn → Enforce Pattern

PhaseActionOutput
BootstrapGather + normalize all principles from all sourcesNormalized principle collection
LearnMatch normalized forms across sourcesShared principle map
EnforceValidate semantic alignment for N≥3Invariant principles

Input Normalization Policy

Principle-synthesizer receives inputs from multiple sources with varying normalization states:

Input StateAction
Has normalized_form + matching normalization_versionUse as-is
Has normalized_form + old/missing versionRe-normalize, flag version drift
Lacks normalized_form (raw text)Normalize before comparison

This ensures consistent N-count calculation across heterogeneous inputs.

Synthesis Process

  1. Gather: Collect extractions from all sources
  2. Align: Find principles that appear in 3+ sources
  3. Validate: Confirm semantic alignment (not just keywords)
  4. Classify: Invariant, domain-specific, or noise
  5. Output: Golden Master candidates with evidence

Distillation Framework

N-Count Progression

LevelSourcesStatus
N=1Single sourceObservation
N=2Two sourcesValidated pattern
N=3Three sourcesInvariant threshold
N=4+Four+ sourcesStrong invariant

Classification Rules

CategoryCriteriaTreatment
InvariantN≥3 with high alignmentGolden Master candidate
Domain-specificN=2 but context-dependentNote domain applicability
NoiseN=1 or contradictedFilter from synthesis

Semantic Alignment for N≥3

A principle achieves N≥3 status when:

  • Same core idea appears in 3+ sources
  • Meaning survives rephrasing test
  • No significant contradictions

Output Schema

{
  "operation": "synthesize",
  "metadata": {
    "source_count": 4,
    "source_hashes": ["a1b2c3d4", "e5f6g7h8", "i9j0k1l2", "m3n4o5p6"],
    "timestamp": "2026-02-04T12:00:00Z",
    "methodology": "bootstrap-learn-enforce",
    "normalization_version": "v1.0.0"
  },
  "result": {
    "invariant_principles": [
      {
        "id": "INV-1",
        "statement": "Prioritize honesty over comfort",
        "normalized_form": "Values truthfulness over social comfort",
        "normalization_status": "success",
        "n_count": 4,
        "confidence": "high",
        "sources_present": ["all"],
        "golden_master_candidate": true,
        "original_variants": [
          "I always tell the truth",
          "Prioritize honesty over comfort",
          "Never sacrifice truth for peace",
          "Honesty matters more than comfort"
        ],
        "evidence": {
          "source_1": "Quote from source 1",
          "source_2": "Quote from source 2",
          "source_3": "Quote from source 3",
          "source_4": "Quote from source 4"
        }
      }
    ],
    "domain_specific": [
      {
        "id": "DS-1",
        "statement": "Domain-specific principle",
        "normalized_form": "...",
        "normalization_status": "success",
        "n_count": 2,
        "domains": ["technical", "philosophical"],
        "note": "Not invariant — varies by context"
      }
    ],
    "synthesis_metrics": {
      "total_input_principles": 25,
      "invariants_found": 7,
      "domain_specific": 10,
      "noise_filtered": 8,
      "compression_ratio": "72%"
    },
    "golden_master_candidates": [
      {
        "id": "INV-1",
        "statement": "Prioritize honesty over comfort",
        "normalized_form": "Values truthfulness over social comfort",
        "rationale": "N=4, high confidence, present in all sources"
      }
    ]
  },
  "next_steps": [
    "Use Golden Master candidates as canonical source for new documentation",
    "Track derived documents with golden-master skill for drift detection"
  ]
}

Voice Preservation in Golden Masters

When creating Golden Master candidates:

  • Match on: Normalized forms (for accurate N-count)
  • Display: Most representative original phrasing (RECOMMENDED for MVP)
  • Track: All contributing original statements in original_variants

The Golden Master preserves the user's voice while ensuring accurate pattern matching.

normalization_status values:

  • "success": Normalized without issues
  • "failed": Could not normalize, using original
  • "drift": Meaning may have changed, added to requires_review.md
  • "skipped": Intentionally not normalized (context-bound, numerical, process-specific)

share_text (When Applicable)

Included only when golden_master_candidates.length >= 1:

"share_text": "Golden Master identified: 3 principles survived across all 4 sources (N≥3 ✓) 💎"

Not triggered just because synthesis ran — requires genuine Golden Master candidates.


Confidence Levels

For Invariant Principles

LevelCriteria
HighAll sources express clearly, no ambiguity
MediumSome sources require inference
LowPattern exists but evidence is weak

For Golden Master Candidacy

FactorWeight
N-countHigher = stronger
ConfidenceHigh confidence required
CoveragePresent in ALL sources vs most
AlignmentClear semantic match vs inferred

Synthesis Metrics

Compression Ratio

compression_ratio = (1 - (invariants / total_input_principles)) × 100%

Quality Indicators

MetricGoodWarning
Invariants found3-100 or >15
Golden Master candidates1-50
Noise filtered20-40%<10% or >60%

Terminology Rules

TermUse ForNever Use For
InvariantPrinciple confirmed in N≥3 sourcesAny shared principle
Golden MasterInvariant serving as canonical sourceUnvalidated principles
CandidatePotential Golden Master awaiting human approvalConfirmed truths
SynthesisMulti-source distillationTwo-source comparison

Error Handling

Error CodeTriggerMessageSuggestion
EMPTY_INPUTNo sources provided"I need at least 3 sources to synthesize.""Provide 3+ extractions or text sources."
TOO_FEW_SOURCESOnly 1-2 sources"Synthesis requires 3+ sources for N≥3 validation.""Add more sources, or use principle-comparator for 2-source comparison."
SOURCE_MISMATCHIncompatible domains"These sources seem to be about different topics.""Synthesis works best with sources covering the same domain."
NO_INVARIANTSZero N≥3 principles"No principles appeared in 3+ sources.""Sources may be genuinely independent, or try related sources."

Related Skills

  • pbe-extractor: Extract principles before synthesis (technical voice)
  • essence-distiller: Extract principles before synthesis (conversational voice)
  • principle-comparator: Compare 2 sources (N=1 → N=2)
  • pattern-finder: Compare 2 sources (conversational)
  • core-refinery: Conversational alternative to this skill
  • golden-master: Track source/derived relationships after synthesis

Required Disclaimer

Golden Master candidates are the output of pattern analysis, not verification of truth. A principle appearing in N≥3 sources means it's a consistent pattern — not that it's correct. Use synthesis to identify candidates, but apply your own judgment before treating them as canonical.


*Built by Obviously Not — Tools for thought, not conclusions.*

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

73.65%
按下载量换算10,135

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills