Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

plan计划

Agent Skill

plan 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

432

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

142

下载量

144
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:plan(计划)
来源仓库:https://github.com/poteto/noodle
仓库路径:skills/plan
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill plan
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill plan

简介

plan 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。

  • 适合在需要根据来源线索快速定位信息时使用,提升搜索效率。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,建议确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill plan。
  • 适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过 GitHub 安装。

SKILL.md

Plan

Produce implementation plans grounded in project principles. Write plans to brain/plans/. Do NOT implement anything — the plan is the deliverable.

Autonomous Session Mode

When this skill runs in a non-interactive Noodle execution session (for example Cook, Oops, or Repair):

  • Skip Step 2 (AskUserQuestion) — the scope is fully defined in the initial prompt.
  • Skip Step 6's pause — write the plan, commit it, emit stage_yield (see Step 6), and end the session. Do not wait for human review.
  • Step 4 (find-skills) — install skills autonomously without confirmation.

All other steps proceed normally.

Use Tasks to track progress. Create a task for each step (TaskCreate), mark each in_progress when starting and completed when done (TaskUpdate). Check TaskList after completing each step.

Step 0 — Triage Complexity

Before running the full planning workflow, assess whether this task actually needs a plan:

Trivially small (1-2 files, obvious approach): Tell the user this task doesn't need a plan and suggest implementing directly without the plan skill. Stop here — do not implement.

Needs planning (proceed to Step 1):

  • The change spans 3+ files or introduces new architecture
  • There are multiple valid approaches and the user should weigh in
  • The task has unclear scope or cross-cutting concerns
  • The user explicitly asks for a plan

Step 1 — Load Principles

Read brain/principles.md. Follow every [[wikilink]] and read each linked principle file. These principles govern all plan decisions — cite them by name in the plan overview and phase files.

Do NOT skip this. Do NOT use memorized principle content — always read fresh. The self-check in Step 5b will verify citations exist.

Step 2 — Define Scope and Constraints

Use AskUserQuestion to resolve ambiguity before exploring the codebase:

  • What is in scope vs explicitly out of scope?
  • Are there constraints (dependencies, platform requirements, existing patterns to preserve)?
  • What does "done" look like?

Frame questions with concrete options. If the request is already clear, confirm scope boundaries briefly and move on.

Step 3 — Explore Context with Subagents

Always delegate exploration to subagents via the Task tool. Never do large-scale codebase exploration in the main context.

Spawn exploration agents (subagent_type: Explore) to:

  • Read existing code in affected areas
  • Identify patterns, conventions, and dependencies
  • Map architecture relevant to the change
  • Find tests, types, and related infrastructure

Run multiple agents in parallel when investigating independent areas. For large explorations, use a team.

Step 4 — Gather Domain Skills

Match installed skills and discover missing ones. See references/domain-skills.md for the routing table and discovery workflow.

Step 5 — Write the Plan

Create the plan using file tools. See references/templates.md for the full directory structure, overview/phase file formats, verification strategy, and CLI scaffolding steps.

Phase sizing

  • 1 function/type + tests per phase, or 1 bug fix — not "one file" or "one component" (too variable)
  • Max 2-3 files touched per phase when possible
  • Prefer 8-10 small phases over 3-4 large ones — small phases keep future options open
  • If a phase lists >5 test cases or >3 functions, split it

Redesign check

For changes touching existing code, apply redesign-from-first-principles:

"If we were building this from scratch with this requirement, what would we build?"

Don't bolt changes onto existing designs — redesign holistically.

Alternatives check

For architectural decisions, briefly sketch 2-3 approaches in the overview's Constraints section. State which was chosen and why. This prevents premature commitment and documents the design space explored. See brain/principles/exhaust-the-design-space.md.

Update plans index and todos

Verify both entries exist after writing the plan:

  • brain/plans/index.md has - [[plans/NN-plan-name/overview]]
  • brain/todos.md has the plan wikilink on the todo item

New todo: read <!-- next-id: N -->, append N. [] description [[plans/NN-plan-name/overview]], increment next-id. Do NOT edit brain/index.md — the auto-index hook maintains it.

Archiving completed plans

Move directory to brain/archive/plans/, update brain/plans/index.md, mark todo done via the todo skill.

Step 5b — Self-Check

After writing all plan files, verify these three constraints before proceeding. Fix any violations before moving on.

Principles cited: The overview must reference at least 2 brain principles by [[wikilink]]. If not, re-read brain/principles.md and add the most relevant ones to the overview's design decisions.

Phase sizing: Review each phase. If any phase touches >3 files or lists >5 test cases, split it into smaller phases. Count the files listed under "Changes" — if the list exceeds 3, the phase is too big.

No code in phases: Phase files must not contain Go/TS/Python code blocks. Name types and functions but do not define them. A phase should read like a brief to a senior engineer, not a diff or implementation spec. If you find code blocks, replace them with prose describing the intended shape.

Step 6 — Present and Yield

Summarize the plan: list the phases, scope boundaries, applicable skills, and verification approach. Ask the user to review the plan files in brain/plans/.

Emit stage_yield to signal the deliverable is complete:

noodle event emit --session $NOODLE_SESSION_ID stage_yield --payload '{"message": "Plan written to brain/plans/NN-slug-name/overview.md"}'

This tells the Noodle backend the stage's work is done, even if the agent process hasn't exited yet. Without this, the stage only completes on clean process exit.

Stop here. Do not begin implementation. The user decides when and how to execute the plan.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.36%
按下载量换算49

Claude

32%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

21.05%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

10.38%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill plan 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills