Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

posthog-survey-creatorPosthog 调查创建者

Agent Skill

posthog-survey-creator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,115

周安装

46

GitHub Stars

31

下载量

364
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:posthog-survey-creator(Posthog 调查创建者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/posthog/skills
仓库路径:skills/posthog-survey-creator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill posthog-survey-creator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/skills --skill posthog-survey-creator

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • posthog-survey-creator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

PostHog Survey Creator

Guide users through creating effective surveys in PostHog via conversational flow. Target audience: Product Managers who need help with survey design, question wording, and targeting strategy.

Critical Rules

  1. One question per message. Wait for user response before proceeding.
  2. Use PostHog MCP first. When MCP is available, query PostHog for information instead of asking the user. Always present findings for validation.
  3. Only ask users when MCP unavailable. Fall back to questions only if MCP tools aren't accessible.
  4. Always create as draft. Never offer to launch immediately. Surveys are created as drafts so users can review in PostHog before launching.

PostHog MCP Detection

At the start of conversation or when needing PostHog data, attempt to use MCP tools:

  • posthog:event-definitions-list — Get available events
  • posthog:properties-list — Get event or person properties
  • posthog:surveys-get-all — Check existing surveys
  • posthog:feature-flag-get-all — Get feature flags for linking

If MCP works: Use data from PostHog and ask user to validate. If MCP fails/unavailable: Ask user directly about their PostHog setup.

Conversation Flow

Opening: Show the Journey

When user asks to create a survey:

"I'll help you create a survey in PostHog. Here's what we'll figure out together:

1. **Goal** – What do you want to learn?
2. **Questions** – What to ask and how
3. **Audience** – Who should see this?
4. **Timing** – When and how often?

Let's start with the goal. **What do you want to learn from this survey?**"

Wait for response.


Step 1: Understand the Goal

Ask: "What do you want to learn from this survey?"

Listen for keywords to match templates:

KeywordsTemplate
"recommend", "loyalty", "NPS"NPS
"satisfied", "satisfaction"CSAT
"easy", "effort", "friction"CES
"disappointed", "product-market fit"PMF
"why signed up", "jobs to be done"JTBD
"price", "expensive", "value"Pricing
"competitor", "alternatives"Competitive Intel
"not using", "adoption"Feature Adoption
"beta", "new feature"Beta Feedback
"trial", "upgrade"Trial Conversion
"new user", "intent"Welcome Survey
"onboarding", "getting started"Activation
"inactive", "churned", "win back"Dormant User
"cancel", "leaving"Churn/Exit
"support", "ticket"Support CSAT

After response: Present matching template OR explore custom, then proceed.


Step 2: Present Template or Explore Custom

If template matches:

"Based on what you're describing, a **Customer Effort Score (CES)** survey would work well. It measures how easy a task was—lower effort correlates with higher retention.

The standard approach is:
- Q1: Rating (1-7) – 'How easy was it to [task]?'
- Q2: Open text (for low scores) – 'What made this difficult?'

**Does this approach work for you, or would you like to customize it?**"

If no template matches:

"This sounds like a custom survey—I'll help you design one.

**What's the single most important thing you want to learn?**"

Step 3: Finalize Questions

If customizing, ask ONE question at a time until questions are defined.

Once set, confirm:

"Here's what we have:
[list questions]

**Does this look right?**"

Step 4: Define Audience (MCP-First Approach)

This is where PostHog MCP becomes critical. Do not ask the user about events or properties if MCP is available.

With PostHog MCP available:

  1. First, ask the high-level targeting question: "Now let's decide who sees this survey. **Who should see it?** For example: - All users - Users on a specific page - A specific segment (paid users, new users, etc.) - Users who completed a specific action"
  2. Based on their answer, query PostHog and present options: If they mention an action/event: ` [Use posthog:event-definitions-list to find matching events] "I found these events in your PostHog that might match: - report_viewed (1.2k times this month) - report_created (340 times this month) - report_exported (89 times this month) **Which event should trigger the survey?**" **If they mention a user segment:** [Use posthog:properties-list with type="person" to find properties] "I found these person properties you could filter by: - plan (values: free, pro, enterprise) - signed_up_at - company_size **Which property should we use, and what value?**" **If they mention a page:** "Got it—I'll target users on that page. What's the URL or URL pattern? (e.g., '/reports' or contains 'dashboard')"`
  3. If checking for existing similar surveys: [Use posthog:surveys-get-all to check for duplicates] "I noticed you already have an 'NPS Survey' running that targets the dashboard. **Should I create a new one, or would you like to modify the existing survey?**"
  4. If linking to feature flags: ` [Use posthog:feature-flag-get-all if user mentions beta/feature flags] "I found these feature flags that might be relevant: - new-reporting-feature (currently 30% rollout) - beta-dashboard-v2 (10% rollout) **Should the survey only show to users with one of these flags enabled?**" `

Without PostHog MCP (fallback):

If MCP tools fail or aren't available, ask the user directly:

"I don't have access to query your PostHog directly.

**Do you know the event name for when users [complete the action]?**
(If not, we can target by page URL instead)"

Or for properties:

"**What's the property name for [plan/segment] in your PostHog?**
(e.g., 'plan', 'subscription_tier', etc.)"

Step 5: Configure Timing

Ask:

"**Should this survey show once per user, or repeat over time?**

- Once is good for most feedback surveys
- Recurring works for NPS (e.g., every 90 days)"

If recurring, follow up:

"**How often should it repeat?**"

Step 6: Confirm and Create

Summarize and ask for final confirmation:

"Here's the survey I'll create:

**Name:** [name]
**Questions:**
1. [Q1]
2. [Q2]

**Audience:** [targeting details]
**Schedule:** [once/recurring]

I'll create this as a draft so you can review and adjust the styling in PostHog before launching.

**Ready to create it?**"

Wait for confirmation, then use posthog:survey-create with start_date: null (draft).


Step 7: After Creation

"Done! Here's your survey: [link]

It's saved as a draft. From PostHog you can:
- Preview how it looks
- Adjust colors and styling
- Launch when you're ready

**Anything else you'd like help with?**"

MCP Query Patterns

Finding events for targeting

1. User says: "Users who created a report"
2. Query: posthog:event-definitions-list with q="report"
3. Present matches: "I found `report_created`, `report_viewed`, `report_shared`. Which one?"
4. User confirms

Finding person properties

1. User says: "Paid users only"
2. Query: posthog:properties-list with type="person"
3. Look for: plan, subscription, tier, pricing-related properties
4. Present: "I found a `plan` property with values free/pro/enterprise. Should we target `plan` is not `free`?"
5. User confirms

Checking existing surveys

1. Before creating, query: posthog:surveys-get-all
2. Check for similar names or targeting
3. If found: "You have an existing [survey name] with similar targeting. Create new or modify existing?"

Finding feature flags

1. User mentions beta/feature rollout
2. Query: posthog:feature-flag-get-all
3. Present relevant flags: "I found `beta-feature-x`. Link the survey to this flag?"

Example Conversation (With MCP)

User: "I want to create a survey"

Claude: "I'll help you create a survey in PostHog. Here's what we'll figure out together:

  1. Goal – What do you want to learn?
  2. Questions – What to ask and how
  3. Audience – Who should see this?
  4. Timing – When and how often?

Let's start. What do you want to learn from this survey?"


User: "I want to know if the new export feature is easy to use"

Claude: "Great! This is perfect for a Customer Effort Score (CES) survey.

Here's the standard approach:

  • Q1 (Rating 1-7): 'How easy was it to use the export feature?'
  • Q2 (Open text, for low scores): 'What would make it easier?'

Does this work, or would you like to customize it?"


User: "That works"

Claude: "Perfect. Now let's decide who should see this.

Who should see the survey? For example:

  • Everyone
  • Users who've used the export feature
  • A specific segment"

User: "People who have used the export feature"

Claude: [Queries posthog:event-definitions-list with q="export"]

"I found these export-related events in your PostHog:

  • export_completed (2.3k times this month)
  • export_started (2.8k times this month)
  • export_failed (145 times this month)

Which event should trigger the survey? I'd recommend export_completed so users have finished the action."


User: "Yes, export_completed"

Claude: "Got it—survey shows after export_completed.

Should this survey show once per user, or repeat over time?"


User: "Once"

Claude: "Here's the survey I'll create:

Name: Export Feature CES Questions:

  1. Rating (1-7): 'How easy was it to use the export feature?'
  2. Open text (low scores): 'What would make it easier?'

Audience: Users who trigger export_completed Schedule: Once per user

I'll create this as a draft so you can review it in PostHog before launching.

Ready to create it?"


User: "Yes"

Claude: [Creates survey via posthog:survey-create with start_date: null]

"Done! Here's your survey: [link]

It's saved as a draft. You can preview it, adjust the styling, and launch when ready.

Anything else you'd like help with?"


Example Conversation (Without MCP)

User: "People who have used the export feature"

Claude: [MCP query fails or unavailable]

"I can't query your PostHog directly. Do you know the event name for when someone completes an export?

If not, we can target by URL instead (e.g., show on the exports page)."


User: "I think it's called export_done"

Claude: "Got it—I'll use export_done as the trigger event.

Should this survey show once per user, or repeat?"


Question Design Reference

See references/question-examples.md for:

  • 22 survey templates with proven questions
  • Targeting recommendations per survey type
  • Branching logic examples

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.94%
按下载量换算131

Claude

29.95%
按下载量换算109

Cursor

20.12%
按下载量换算73

Gemini CLI

9.07%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills