Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

popcorn-xp爆米花 xp

Agent Skill

popcorn-xp 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

269

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

86
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:popcorn-xp(爆米花 xp)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mikewolfd/xp-popcorn-skill
仓库路径:skills/popcorn-xp
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mikewolfd/xp-popcorn-skill --skill popcorn-xp
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mikewolfd/xp-popcorn-skill --skill popcorn-xp

简介

爆米花 xp 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 它支持根据关键词或任务场景进行信息筛选,适用于经验值相关场景的数据调研。
  • 可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,具体用法需结合原始 README 进一步确认。
  • 安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态,并评估是否会触发联网或文件操作。
  • popcorn-xp 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Popcorn XP

Launch an XP pair-programming session. You (the lead) set up the team and step back. Teammates pair-program directly with each other via SendMessage. One driver edits, one navigator steers, they swap roles between tasks. Advice has teeth — OBJECTIONs block task completion.

Trigger

Activate when the user explicitly asks for a team-style workflow:

  • "pair program on this"
  • "run an XP session"
  • "use subagents"
  • "let a team of agents work this"
  • "popcorn this task"

Do not activate for ordinary single-agent coding.

Role Roster

The plugin ships with agent definitions in agents/ that can be used as teammates. Pick 2-3 agents that match the task. Default to the core four for coding tasks; add specialists when the task calls for them.

Core roles (coding tasks):

AgentLensModel
popcorn-xp:scout"Are we solving the right problem?"sonnet
popcorn-xp:craftsman"Is this clean and readable?"opus
popcorn-xp:expert"Does this actually work in edge cases?"opus (has project memory)
popcorn-xp:tester"How will we prove this?"opus

Specialist roles (when needed):

AgentLensModel
popcorn-xp:service-designer"Does the interface serve the experience — API to UI?"sonnet
popcorn-xp:visual-designer"Does this look right and feel right?"sonnet
popcorn-xp:qa"Does this work from the user's perspective?"sonnet
popcorn-xp:product-manager"What problem are we solving, and is this the right way?"sonnet

Checking for local overrides: Before spawning teammates, check if the project has custom agents in .claude/agents/ that overlap with the popcorn-xp roles (e.g., a project-specific test-engineer or code-scout). Prefer local agents when they exist — they carry project-specific context. Use popcorn-xp agents as defaults when no local override exists.

The lens shapes how an agent thinks, not what it's allowed to do. Any teammate can drive, navigate, write tests, or review code. When rotating, prefer giving the driver role to whoever was just navigating — they carry context from watching the code emerge.

Workflow

1. Understand the Task

Before creating the team, understand the problem yourself. If you have file access, read the relevant code. If you are in coordinator mode (no file tools), spawn a quick research worker to gather context.

Check for prior retros. If .popcorn-xp/RETRO.md exists, read it. It contains process observations from previous sessions on this codebase — what worked, what didn't, what to change. Apply any relevant recommendations.

Build a mental model of:

  • What files are involved
  • What the user wants changed
  • What could go wrong
  • How to verify success

Break the work into 3-6 concrete tasks.

2. Create the Team

TeamCreate "popcorn-xp"

3. Create Tasks

Use TaskCreate for each work item. Set dependencies with TaskUpdate so tasks unblock in order.

Example task breakdown:

Task 1: "Map affected files, entry points, and constraints"
Task 2: "Implement depth validation in parseBlock()" — blocked by 1
Task 3: "Add regression tests for invalid input" — blocked by 2
Task 4: "Run full test suite and verify no regressions" — blocked by 3

Include enough context in each task description for a teammate to execute it independently. State what to do, why it matters, and what success looks like.

4. Spawn Teammates

Launch 2-3 teammates using the Agent tool with team_name: "popcorn-xp". Give each teammate the protocol from references/protocol.md and their role assignment.

Driver teammate — the role best suited to the first task:

Agent(
  name: "craftsman",
  team_name: "popcorn-xp",
  prompt: "<driver coordinator prompt from protocol.md>"
)

Navigator teammate — the role that provides the most useful counter-lens:

Agent(
  name: "expert",
  team_name: "popcorn-xp",
  prompt: "<navigator coordinator prompt from protocol.md>"
)

Advisor teammate (optional) — when a third perspective adds value:

Agent(
  name: "tester",
  team_name: "popcorn-xp",
  prompt: "<advisor coordinator prompt from protocol.md>"
)

Assign the first task to the driver via TaskUpdate.

5. Monitor

You receive messages from teammates automatically. Your role during execution:

  • Acknowledge completion messages. When a teammate finishes a task, check TaskList and assign or approve the next task.
  • Steer when needed. If a teammate is going in the wrong direction, SendMessage with guidance.
  • Relay user input. If the user provides new instructions, SendMessage to the relevant teammate.
  • Handle rotation. When a task completes, swap the driver and navigator roles. The agent that was navigating should drive the next task — they've been watching the code and carry context the other agent doesn't. Resist assigning tasks to the "best-fit" role; rotation is for knowledge sharing, not specialization.
  • Handle escalations. If the navigator sends an ESCALATION message (the approach is fundamentally wrong), pause the current task, evaluate the concern, and decide whether to redirect, reset, or continue.
  • Do not do the work yourself. You are the lead, not a driver. If you find yourself wanting to read a file or write code, delegate it to a teammate instead.

6. Verify and Close

When all tasks are complete:

  1. Ask a teammate (typically the tester) to run final verification.
  2. Confirm no unresolved OBJECTIONs exist (ask the navigator or check via a teammate).
  3. Retrospective — ask each teammate: "What worked well? What would you change about the process? Any observations about the pairing dynamic, the advice system, the rotation, or the task breakdown?" Collect their responses.
  4. Present a technical summary to the user: what was done, what each role found, any remaining risk.
  5. Shut down teammates: SendMessage(to: "*", message: {type: "shutdown_request"})
  6. After teammates shut down: TeamDelete
  7. Write the retro file. After TeamDelete, write .popcorn-xp/RETRO.md with your assessment of the session. This is YOUR perspective as the lead — what you observed about how the team worked, not just what they built. Use the format below.

Retro File Format

Write .popcorn-xp/RETRO.md after every session. This file accumulates across sessions — append a new entry, don't overwrite prior retros.

# Popcorn XP Retro

## Session: {date} — {task summary}

### Team
- Driver(s): {who drove which tasks}
- Navigator(s): {who navigated which tasks}
- Advisor(s): {if any}

### What Worked
- {concrete observation — e.g., "rotation after task 2 gave the expert context they used to catch OBJ-3-01"}
- {concrete observation}

### What Didn't Work
- {concrete observation — e.g., "navigator went idle for 3 checkpoints because checkpoints were too small to analyze"}
- {concrete observation}

### Advice System
- OBJECTIONs raised: {count}
- OBJECTIONs fixed: {count}
- OBJECTIONs rejected: {count}
- SMELLs/STEERs/FYIs: {count}
- Assessment: {did the advice system create the right dynamic? too many objections? too few? did the driver push back enough?}

### Rotation
- {did rotation spread knowledge? did assigning by lens-fit happen despite the protocol? did the navigator-becomes-driver pattern work?}

### Process Observations
- {anything about the protocol itself — too much ceremony? not enough checkpoints? file format issues?}
- {teammate feedback from the retro conversation}

### Recommendations
- {what to change next time — e.g., "start with scout driving orientation before craftsman drives implementation"}
- {what to keep — e.g., "the expert-as-navigator pattern caught 2 real bugs"}

This file is for the human. Read it before starting the next popcorn-xp session on the same codebase — it's the team's institutional memory about how the process works here.

Advice System

Strong opinions, loosely held. The driver has their own approach and should defend it. Advice is input from a different lens — not instructions to follow. The navigator might be wrong. The driver might be wrong. The point is engagement, not compliance.

TypeMeaningDriver responseBlocks?
OBJECTION"This is wrong."Engage: fix if they're right, reject with reasoning if not. Both valid.Yes
SMELL"This looks off."Read it. Use your judgment. Acknowledge when you can.No
STEER"Try a different approach."Consider it honestly. Your way might be better.No
FYI"Noticed this, might matter later."Noted.No

Only OBJECTIONs block task completion. Everything else is the driver's call. The navigator should use OBJECTION sparingly — overusing it makes them a blocker, not a partner.

Advice is sent via SendMessage (real-time) and appended to .popcorn-xp/ADVICE.md (persistent record).

Three hooks support the advice lifecycle:

  • TaskCompleted — blocks on open OBJECTIONs, reminds of other open advice
  • TeammateIdle — reminds the agent of open advice items when they go idle
  • SubagentStop — backup block on open OBJECTIONs

Session Files

Three files in .popcorn-xp/:

  • LOG.md — Append-only execution history. What was done, what was learned, what was decided. Written by teammates during the session.
  • ADVICE.md — Persistent record of all typed advice and resolutions. Written by teammates during the session.
  • RETRO.md — Accumulated retrospective entries. Written by the lead after each session. Read this before starting the next session — it's the team's process memory.

The first teammate to start work creates .popcorn-xp/, LOG.md, and ADVICE.md. The lead creates RETRO.md after TeamDelete.

Quality Bar

  • Only one driver edits at a time. The navigator reads and advises. No concurrent edits.
  • OBJECTIONs block task completion. No exceptions.
  • Different roles must contribute materially different perspectives.
  • Task descriptions carry enough context for independent execution.
  • LOG.md is detailed enough that the next agent can reconstruct what happened.
  • The lead manages the team but does not do the work.
  • Stop spawning rounds when additional tasks stop changing the plan.

Reference

Read references/protocol.md for teammate prompt templates, advice format, and session file templates. Include the relevant protocol sections in teammate prompts when spawning them.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.49%
按下载量换算30

Claude

29.94%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

20.6%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

9.86%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/mikewolfd/xp-popcorn-skill --skill popcorn-xp 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills