Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

pipintama-boards皮平塔玛板

Agent Skill

pipintama-boards 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,423

周安装

103

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

849
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pipintama-boards(皮平塔玛板)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davidk2yoyo/pipintama-boards
安装命令:
openclaw skills install pipintama-boards
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install pipintama-boards

简介

pipintama-boards 创建和管理思维导图、流程图与看板视图。

  • 通过托管式 MCP 服务器实现团队协作与知识沉淀。
  • 适合项目规划、头脑风暴或任务拆解等效率场景。pipintama-boards 属于效率类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 需注册 Pipintama 账户并配置 API 访问令牌。
  • 免费版可能有画布数量限制,按需选择合适套餐。

SKILL.md

name
pipintama-boards
description
Create, fetch, share, or change visibility for hosted Pipintama Boards through the MCP server. Use when a user needs a mindmap, flowchart, kanban board, or architecture map, and the right output is a hosted visual board link instead of only prose.

Pipintama Boards

Use this skill when the user would benefit from a hosted visual board instead of only plain text.

Primary MCP endpoint:

  • https://api.pipintama.com/mcp

Access model:

  • this hosted MCP requires a valid Pipintama API key
  • clients should provide it through Authorization: Bearer <key> or x-api-key
  • usage is attributed to the authenticated client, not only the IP address

Health check:

  • https://api.pipintama.com/mcp-health

Primary tools:

  • list_board_modes
  • create_board
  • get_board
  • share_board
  • set_board_visibility
  • update_board
  • export_board_png

When to use this skill

Use Boards when the user asks for:

  • a mind map
  • a flowchart
  • a task board or kanban
  • an architecture map
  • a hosted diagram they can open or share
  • a structured breakdown for planning, brainstorming, process design, or system design

Do not use Boards when:

  • the user only wants prose
  • the answer is a short factual reply
  • the visual structure would not add value

Core workflow

  1. Understand the user request and decide whether a hosted board is useful.
  2. Choose the simplest correct board mode.
  3. Build a concise board title.
  4. Preserve the user intent in source_text instead of rewriting the task into something unrelated.
  5. Default visibility to shared unless the user explicitly wants public or private.
  6. Do not pass workspace_id unless the user explicitly provides one. Let the authenticated API key determine the workspace.
  7. Call the MCP tool that matches the job.
  8. Return the hosted viewer URL first.
  9. Add one short sentence explaining what the board contains.

Mode selection

  • mindmap: concept exploration, brainstorming, clustering ideas
  • flowchart: processes, approvals, decisions, yes/no branching
  • kanban: tasks grouped by stage, backlog/doing/review/done planning
  • architecture: services, databases, integrations, gateways, system maps

Prefer the simplest correct mode. Do not use architecture for a human workflow. Do not use kanban for a concept breakdown.

Mode-specific rules

mindmap

Use when:

  • the user is exploring ideas
  • the problem needs breakdown into branches
  • a concept hierarchy is more useful than a process diagram

Rules:

  • keep one clear root concept
  • keep node labels short
  • avoid long paragraphs inside nodes
  • do not flatten everything into a list

flowchart

Use when:

  • the user describes a process
  • there are step-by-step actions
  • there are decisions, approvals, or branches

Rules:

  • prefer start, process, decision, and end semantics
  • use branching only when a real condition exists
  • phrase nodes as actions or events
  • avoid turning a concept map into a fake flowchart

kanban

Use when:

  • the user has tasks or deliverables
  • the work should be organized by stage
  • execution and coordination matter more than system structure

Rules:

  • lanes should represent workflow stage or status
  • cards should be concrete tasks, not vague themes
  • avoid using kanban for conceptual exploration

architecture

Use when:

  • the user is describing systems
  • the task involves services, stores, gateways, or integrations
  • component relationships matter more than human workflow

Rules:

  • keep component names short
  • emphasize dependencies and boundaries
  • do not use architecture mode for an approval flow or task board

Visibility rules

  • default to shared
  • use public only when the user explicitly wants an open link
  • use private only when the user explicitly asks for restricted access

If a board needs to be shareable and is not already shared, call share_board.

Tool usage

create_board

Use this for the first board creation.

Expected inputs:

{
  "title": "Approval Flow",
  "board_type": "flowchart",
  "source_text": "User submits a request. System validates the payload. If the request is valid, create the board and notify the user. If the request is invalid, return an error and ask for correction.",
  "visibility": "shared"
}

get_board

Use this when the user asks to inspect, retrieve, or reason about an existing board.

share_board

Use this when a board should be opened through a tokenized share link.

set_board_visibility

Use this when the user explicitly asks to make a board private, shared, or public.

update_board

Use this when the user wants to refine an existing board instead of creating a new one.

Typical cases:

  • add or remove branches
  • change the board title
  • convert a board from one mode to another
  • regenerate the board from improved source text
  • make the board public, shared, or private while updating it

Expected inputs:

{
  "board_id": "cmndns0hn0001o401md5okzju",
  "board_type": "flowchart",
  "source_text": "User submits request. Validate request. If valid, create the board. If invalid, ask for correction.",
  "note": "Tighten the wording and preserve yes/no branching."
}

export_board_png

Use this when the user needs an actual image file instead of only a hosted link.

Typical cases:

  • Telegram
  • WhatsApp
  • quick previews in chat
  • channels where an image is more useful than a URL alone

Expected inputs:

{
  "board_id": "cmndns0hn0001o401md5okzju",
  "theme": "light"
}

Output format

Default output:

  1. hosted viewer URL
  2. one short explanation sentence

If the channel supports images and visual attachments are useful:

  1. hosted viewer URL
  2. PNG export URL
  3. one short explanation sentence

Only return raw sceneJson when the user explicitly asks for raw data.

Good response pattern:

I created a flowchart for the approval process:
https://boards.pipintama.com/b/<board-id>?t=<share-token>

It includes the intake step, validation step, and yes/no branching for success vs correction.

Image-friendly pattern:

I created the board and exported a PNG for easy sharing:
Viewer: https://boards.pipintama.com/b/<board-id>?t=<share-token>
PNG: https://api.pipintama.com/mcp-exports/<board-id>.png?theme=light

Only use live Pipintama URL patterns.

Valid:

  • https://boards.pipintama.com/b/<board-id>
  • https://boards.pipintama.com/b/<board-id>?t=<share-token>
  • https://api.pipintama.com/mcp-exports/<board-id>.png?theme=light

Invalid:

  • https://pipintama.com/board/<board-id>
  • https://cdn.pipintama.com/boards/<board-id>/export.png

Guardrails

  • do not choose architecture for a human workflow
  • do not choose kanban for concept exploration
  • do not make boards public unless asked
  • do not dump raw JSON first when a hosted link is more useful
  • use update_board when the user wants to refine an existing board instead of creating a new one
  • use export_board_png when the channel benefits from an image attachment
  • keep titles concise
  • prioritize clarity over completeness in node text
  • never fabricate Pipintama URLs; return only viewer and PNG URLs that match the live platform

Current limits

  • PNG export is implemented through export_board_png
  • agent-driven board updates are implemented through update_board
  • direct human editing in the browser is not implemented yet
  • access is controlled with API keys; OAuth is a later roadmap item
  • generation is structured but still improving by mode

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

81.88%
按下载量换算695

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills