Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

code-quality代码质量

Agent Skill

用于辅助 Java 项目开发、面向对象设计、Spring 生态、Maven 或 Gradle 依赖和后端工程实践。它适合让 Agent 分析类结构、设计接口、整理服务分层、生成测试或检查常见代码坏味道。使用时需要结合项目已有架构、包结构和依赖版本,不应只按通用教程改代码;涉及数据库、事务、并发或框架配置时,应先确认运行环境和回归测试范围。

总安装

196

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

1,133

下载量

63
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-quality(代码质量)
来源仓库:https://github.com/piomin/claude-ai-spring-boot
仓库路径:skills/code-quality
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/piomin/claude-ai-spring-boot --skill code-quality
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/piomin/claude-ai-spring-boot --skill code-quality

简介

用于辅助 Java 项目开发和 Spring 生态实践。

  • 适合分析类结构、设计接口或整理服务分层。
  • 使用时需结合项目已有架构和依赖版本。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 涉及数据库或事务时应先确认运行环境和测试范围。
  • code-quality 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Code Quality Review Skill

Systematic code review combining clean code principles, API design, and Java best practices.

When to Use

  • "review this code" / "code review" / "check this PR"
  • "refactor" / "clean this code" / "improve readability"
  • "review API" / "check endpoints" / "REST review"
  • Before merging PR or releasing API changes

Review Strategy

  1. Quick scan - Understand intent, identify scope
  2. Checklist pass - Apply relevant categories below
  3. Summary - List findings by severity (Critical → Minor → Good)

Clean Code Principles

DRY - Don't Repeat Yourself

Violation:

// ❌ Duplicated validation logic
public void createUser(UserRequest req) {
    if (req.getEmail() == null || !req.getEmail().contains("@")) {
        throw new ValidationException("Invalid email");
    }
}

public void updateUser(UserRequest req) {
    if (req.getEmail() == null || !req.getEmail().contains("@")) {
        throw new ValidationException("Invalid email");
    }
}

Fix:

// ✅ Single source of truth
public class EmailValidator {
    public void validate(String email) {
        if (email == null || !email.contains("@")) {
            throw new ValidationException("Invalid email");
        }
    }
}

KISS - Keep It Simple

Violation:

// ❌ Over-engineered
public interface UserFactory {
    User createUser();
}
public class ConcreteUserFactory implements UserFactory {
    public User createUser() { return new User(); }
}

Fix:

// ✅ Simple
public User createUser() { return new User(); }

YAGNI - You Aren't Gonna Need It

Violation:

// ❌ Premature abstraction
public class ConfigurableUserServiceFactoryProvider { }

Fix:

// ✅ Implement when actually needed
public class UserService { }

API Contract Review

HTTP Verb Semantics

VerbUse ForIdempotentSafe
GETRetrieve resourceYesYes
POSTCreate new resourceNoNo
PUTReplace entire resourceYesNo
PATCHPartial updateNo*No
DELETERemove resourceYesNo

Common Mistakes:

// ❌ POST for retrieval
@PostMapping("/users/search")
public List<User> search(@RequestBody SearchCriteria criteria) { }

// ✅ GET with query params
@GetMapping("/users")
public List<User> search(@RequestParam String name) { }

// ❌ GET for state change
@GetMapping("/users/{id}/activate")
public void activate(@PathVariable Long id) { }

// ✅ POST/PATCH for state change
@PostMapping("/users/{id}/activate")
public ResponseEntity<Void> activate(@PathVariable Long id) { }

API Versioning

// ✅ URL path versioning (recommended)
@RestController
@RequestMapping("/api/v1/users")
public class UserControllerV1 { }

// ❌ No versioning
@RequestMapping("/users")  // Breaking changes affect all clients

Response Status Codes

CodeUse CaseExample
200 OKSuccessful GET/PUT/PATCHFound resource
201 CreatedSuccessful POSTNew resource created
204 No ContentSuccessful DELETEResource deleted
400 Bad RequestValidation failureInvalid input
404 Not FoundResource doesn't existUser not found
409 ConflictState conflictDuplicate email
500 Server ErrorUnexpected errorDatabase down

DTO vs Entity Exposure

// ❌ Exposing JPA entity
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public User getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    return userRepository.findById(id).get();  // Exposes internals, N+1 risk
}

// ✅ Use DTO
@GetMapping("/{id}")
public UserResponse getUser(@PathVariable Long id) {
    return userService.findById(id);  // Returns DTO
}

Java Code Review Checklist

Null Safety

Check for:

// ❌ NPE risk
String name = user.getName().toUpperCase();

// ✅ Safe with Optional
String name = Optional.ofNullable(user.getName())
    .map(String::toUpperCase)
    .orElse("");

// ✅ Safe with early return
if (user.getName() == null) return "";
return user.getName().toUpperCase();

Flags:

  • Chained calls without null checks
  • Optional.get() without isPresent()
  • Returning null instead of Optional or empty collection
  • Missing @Nullable/@NonNull on public APIs

Exception Handling

Check for:

// ❌ Swallowing exceptions
try {
    process();
} catch (Exception e) { }  // Silent failure

// ❌ Losing stack trace
catch (IOException e) {
    throw new RuntimeException(e.getMessage());  // Lost context
}

// ✅ Proper handling
catch (IOException e) {
    log.error("Failed to process file: {}", filename, e);
    throw new ProcessingException("File processing failed", e);
}

Flags:

  • Empty catch blocks
  • Catching Exception or Throwable (too broad)
  • Not logging exceptions
  • Creating new exception without original cause

Resource Management

Check for:

// ❌ Resource leak
FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file);
String content = read(fis);
fis.close();  // Won't execute if read() throws

// ✅ Try-with-resources
try (FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file)) {
    return read(fis);
}  // Auto-closed

Transaction Boundaries

Check for:

// ❌ Missing transaction
public void createUser(UserRequest request) {
    User user = new User();
    userRepository.save(user);
    roleRepository.save(new Role(user));  // Two separate transactions
}

// ✅ Proper transaction
@Transactional
public void createUser(UserRequest request) {
    User user = new User();
    userRepository.save(user);
    roleRepository.save(new Role(user));  // Single atomic transaction
}

Naming Conventions

Good:

// ✅ Clear intent
public List<User> findActiveUsersByRole(String role) { }
public boolean isEmailValid(String email) { }
public void activateUser(Long userId) { }

Bad:

// ❌ Unclear
public List<User> get(String s) { }
public boolean check(String str) { }
public void doStuff(Long id) { }

Performance

Check for:

// ❌ N+1 query problem
List<User> users = userRepository.findAll();
for (User user : users) {
    List<Order> orders = orderRepository.findByUserId(user.getId());  // N queries
}

// ✅ Join fetch
@Query("SELECT u FROM User u LEFT JOIN FETCH u.orders")
List<User> findAllWithOrders();

// ❌ Loading all data
List<User> allUsers = userRepository.findAll();  // Could be millions

// ✅ Pagination
Page<User> users = userRepository.findAll(PageRequest.of(0, 20));

Review Output Format

## Code Review: [Component/Feature Name]

### Critical Issues
- **Null safety violation** (UserService.java:42) - `user.getName().toUpperCase()` can NPE. Use Optional or null check.
- **Resource leak** (FileHandler.java:15) - FileInputStream not closed. Use try-with-resources.

### Important Improvements
- **API design** - POST used for idempotent update (UserController.java:28). Use PUT instead.
- **Transaction missing** - Multi-step operation needs @Transactional (OrderService.java:56).
- **N+1 query** - Loop fetches orders individually (line 89). Use JOIN FETCH.

### Code Smells
- **Long method** - extractUserData() is 80 lines. Consider extracting sub-methods.
- **Magic number** - Use named constant instead of `86400` (line 123).
- **Inconsistent naming** - Mix of camelCase and snake_case in variables.

### Good Practices Observed
- ✅ Constructor injection used throughout
- ✅ DTOs properly separate from entities
- ✅ Comprehensive validation on all endpoints
- ✅ Good test coverage (87%)

Quick Reference Flags

CategoryRed Flags
Null SafetyChained calls, Optional.get(), returning null
ExceptionsEmpty catch, broad catch, lost stack trace
ResourcesManual close(), missing try-with-resources
API DesignWrong HTTP verb, no versioning, entity exposure
TransactionsMulti-step writes without @Transactional
PerformanceN+1 queries, loading all data, missing indexes
Clean CodeCode duplication, magic numbers, unclear names

Severity Levels

  • Critical - Security, data loss, crash risk → Must fix before merge
  • Important - Performance, maintainability, correctness → Should fix
  • Code Smell - Style, complexity, minor issues → Nice to have
  • Good - Positive feedback to reinforce good practices

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.35%
按下载量换算24

Claude

28.34%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

20.47%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.95%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills