Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

performing-user-behavior-analytics执行用户行为分析

Agent Skill

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

总安装

321

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

5,924

下载量

101
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-user-behavior-analytics(执行用户行为分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-user-behavior-analytics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-user-behavior-analytics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-user-behavior-analytics

简介

对用户活动数据进行清洗、统计与异常模式识别。

  • 可用于内部威胁检测、权限滥用监控或用户体验优化。
  • 通过 GitHub 仓库安装,需对接业务系统导出 CSV/JSON 数据。
  • 处理敏感字段时应加密或匿名化,遵守隐私保护法规。
  • performing-user-behavior-analytics 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Performing User Behavior Analytics

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • SOC teams need to detect compromised accounts through abnormal authentication patterns
  • Insider threat programs require behavioral monitoring beyond rule-based detection
  • Impossible travel or geographic anomalies indicate credential compromise
  • Privileged account monitoring requires baseline deviation detection

Do not use as the sole basis for disciplinary action — UEBA findings are indicators requiring investigation, not proof of malicious intent.

Prerequisites

  • SIEM with 30+ days of authentication and access log history for baseline creation
  • VPN, O365, and Active Directory authentication logs normalized to CIM
  • GeoIP database (MaxMind GeoLite2) for location-based anomaly detection
  • Identity enrichment data (department, role, manager, typical work hours)
  • Splunk Enterprise Security with UBA module or equivalent UEBA capability

Workflow

Step 1: Build User Authentication Baselines

Create behavioral baselines from historical data:

index=auth sourcetype IN ("o365:management:activity", "vpn_logs", "WinEventLog:Security")
earliest=-30d latest=-1d
| stats dc(src_ip) AS unique_ips,
        dc(src_country) AS unique_countries,
        dc(app) AS unique_apps,
        count AS total_logins,
        earliest(_time) AS first_login,
        latest(_time) AS last_login,
        values(src_country) AS countries,
        avg(eval(strftime(_time, "%H"))) AS avg_login_hour,
        stdev(eval(strftime(_time, "%H"))) AS stdev_login_hour
  by user
| eval avg_daily_logins = round(total_logins / 30, 1)
| eval login_hour_range = round(avg_login_hour, 0)." +/- ".round(stdev_login_hour, 1)." hrs"
| table user, unique_ips, unique_countries, unique_apps, avg_daily_logins,
        login_hour_range, countries

Step 2: Detect Impossible Travel

Identify logins from geographically distant locations within impossible timeframes:

index=auth sourcetype IN ("o365:management:activity", "vpn_logs")
action=success earliest=-24h
| iplocation src_ip
| sort user, _time
| streamstats current=f last(lat) AS prev_lat, last(lon) AS prev_lon,
              last(_time) AS prev_time, last(City) AS prev_city,
              last(Country) AS prev_country, last(src_ip) AS prev_ip
  by user
| where isnotnull(prev_lat)
| eval distance_km = round(
    6371 * acos(
      cos(pi()/180 * lat) * cos(pi()/180 * prev_lat) *
      cos(pi()/180 * (lon - prev_lon)) +
      sin(pi()/180 * lat) * sin(pi()/180 * prev_lat)
    ), 0)
| eval time_diff_hours = round((_time - prev_time) / 3600, 2)
| eval speed_kmh = if(time_diff_hours > 0, round(distance_km / time_diff_hours, 0), 0)
| where speed_kmh > 900 AND distance_km > 500
| eval alert = "IMPOSSIBLE TRAVEL: ".prev_city.", ".prev_country." -> ".City.", ".Country
| table _time, user, prev_city, prev_country, City, Country, distance_km,
        time_diff_hours, speed_kmh, alert
| sort - speed_kmh

Step 3: Detect Anomalous Login Timing

Identify logins outside a user's normal working hours:

index=auth action=success earliest=-7d
| eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
| eval day_of_week = strftime(_time, "%A")
| eval is_weekend = if(day_of_week IN ("Saturday", "Sunday"), 1, 0)
| eval is_off_hours = if(hour < 6 OR hour > 22, 1, 0)
| join user type=left [
    search index=auth action=success earliest=-60d latest=-7d
    | eval hour = strftime(_time, "%H")
    | stats avg(hour) AS baseline_avg_hour, stdev(hour) AS baseline_stdev_hour,
            perc95(hour) AS baseline_latest_hour by user
  ]
| where (is_off_hours=1 OR is_weekend=1) AND
        (hour > baseline_latest_hour + 2 OR hour < baseline_avg_hour - baseline_stdev_hour * 2)
| stats count, values(hour) AS login_hours, values(day_of_week) AS login_days,
        values(src_ip) AS source_ips
  by user, baseline_avg_hour, baseline_latest_hour
| where count > 0
| sort - count

Step 4: Detect Unusual Data Access Patterns

Monitor for abnormal file or database access volumes:

index=file_access OR index=sharepoint earliest=-24h
| stats sum(bytes) AS total_bytes, dc(file_path) AS unique_files,
        count AS access_count by user
| join user type=left [
    search index=file_access OR index=sharepoint earliest=-30d latest=-1d
    | stats avg(eval(count)) AS baseline_avg_files,
            stdev(eval(count)) AS baseline_stdev_files,
            avg(eval(sum(bytes))) AS baseline_avg_bytes
      by user
  ]
| eval bytes_gb = round(total_bytes / 1073741824, 2)
| eval z_score_files = round((unique_files - baseline_avg_files) / baseline_stdev_files, 2)
| where z_score_files > 3 OR bytes_gb > 5
| eval anomaly_level = case(
    z_score_files > 5, "CRITICAL",
    z_score_files > 3, "HIGH",
    bytes_gb > 10, "CRITICAL",
    bytes_gb > 5, "HIGH",
    1=1, "MEDIUM"
  )
| sort - z_score_files
| table user, unique_files, bytes_gb, baseline_avg_files, z_score_files, anomaly_level

Step 5: Detect Privilege Abuse Patterns

Monitor privileged account usage anomalies:

index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security"
(EventCode=4672 OR EventCode=4624 OR EventCode=4648) earliest=-24h
| eval is_privileged = if(EventCode=4672, 1, 0)
| eval is_explicit_cred = if(EventCode=4648, 1, 0)
| stats sum(is_privileged) AS priv_events,
        sum(is_explicit_cred) AS explicit_cred_events,
        dc(ComputerName) AS unique_hosts,
        values(ComputerName) AS hosts_accessed
  by TargetUserName, src_ip
| join TargetUserName type=left [
    search index=wineventlog EventCode IN (4672, 4624, 4648) earliest=-30d latest=-1d
    | stats dc(ComputerName) AS baseline_hosts,
            avg(eval(count)) AS baseline_daily_events by TargetUserName
  ]
| where unique_hosts > baseline_hosts * 2 OR priv_events > baseline_daily_events * 3
| eval risk_score = (unique_hosts / baseline_hosts * 30) + (priv_events / baseline_daily_events * 20)
| sort - risk_score
| table TargetUserName, src_ip, unique_hosts, baseline_hosts, priv_events,
        baseline_daily_events, risk_score, hosts_accessed

Step 6: Generate Risk Score and Prioritize Investigation

Aggregate all UEBA signals into a composite risk score:

| inputlookup ueba_impossible_travel.csv
| append [| inputlookup ueba_off_hours_access.csv]
| append [| inputlookup ueba_data_access_anomaly.csv]
| append [| inputlookup ueba_privilege_abuse.csv]
| stats sum(risk_points) AS total_risk,
        values(anomaly_type) AS anomaly_types,
        dc(anomaly_type) AS anomaly_count
  by user
| lookup identity_lookup_expanded identity AS user
  OUTPUT department, managedBy, priority AS user_priority
| eval final_risk = total_risk * case(
    user_priority="critical", 2.0,
    user_priority="high", 1.5,
    user_priority="medium", 1.0,
    1=1, 0.8
  )
| sort - final_risk
| head 20
| table user, department, managedBy, anomaly_types, anomaly_count, total_risk, final_risk

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
UEBAUser and Entity Behavior Analytics — behavioral analysis detecting anomalies against established baselines
Impossible TravelLogin events from geographically distant locations within timeframes making physical travel impossible
Behavioral BaselineStatistical profile of normal user activity patterns built from 30-90 days of historical data
Z-ScoreStatistical measure of how many standard deviations an observation is from the mean — values > 3 indicate anomalies
Risk ScoreComposite numerical score aggregating multiple behavioral anomalies weighted by asset criticality
Peer Group AnalysisComparing a user's behavior to others in the same department/role to identify outliers

Tools & Systems

  • Splunk UBA: Dedicated User Behavior Analytics module integrating with Splunk ES for ML-driven anomaly detection
  • Microsoft Sentinel UEBA: Built-in UEBA capability in Azure Sentinel with entity pages and investigation graphs
  • Exabeam Advanced Analytics: Standalone UEBA platform with session stitching and automatic timeline creation
  • Securonix: Cloud-native SIEM/UEBA with pre-built behavioral models for insider threat detection

Common Scenarios

  • Compromised Account: Impossible travel + off-hours login + unusual app access = likely credential compromise
  • Insider Data Theft: Employee accessing 10x normal file volume in notice period before departure
  • Privilege Escalation Abuse: Admin account used from unusual location accessing systems outside normal scope
  • Shared Account Detection: Service account logging in from multiple geographies simultaneously
  • Dormant Account Reactivation: Account with no activity for 90+ days suddenly performing privileged operations

Output Format

UEBA ANOMALY REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Period:       2024-03-11 to 2024-03-17
Users Baselined:  2,847
Anomalies Detected: 23

TOP RISK USERS:
#  User          Dept       Risk   Anomalies
1. jsmith        Finance    94.5   Impossible travel (NYC->Moscow, 2h), off-hours access, 15GB download
2. admin_svc01   IT Ops     82.0   Login from 12 new IPs, 47 hosts accessed (baseline: 8)
3. mwilson       HR         67.3   Off-hours file access (2AM), 3x normal download volume

INVESTIGATION STATUS:
  jsmith:      Escalated to Tier 2 — possible account compromise (IR-2024-0445)
  admin_svc01: Under review — may be new automation deployment (checking with IT Ops)
  mwilson:     Pending HR context — employee on notice period, monitoring increased

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.21%
按下载量换算36

Claude

28.35%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

18.43%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

8.96%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills