Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty使用 claroty 进行 OT 漏洞评估

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

188

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

5,886

下载量

66
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty(使用 claroty 进行 OT 漏洞评估)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty

简介

使用 claroty 进行 OT 漏洞评估,检查工控系统安全。

  • 适用于制造业、能源与基础设施安全审计。
  • 扫描 PLC、SCADA 设备,识别已知漏洞与配置错误。
  • 操作前应制定回滚计划,避免影响生产控制系统。
  • performing-ot-vulnerability-assessment-with-claroty 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Performing OT Vulnerability Assessment with Claroty

When to Use

  • When conducting scheduled OT vulnerability assessments per IEC 62443 or NERC CIP requirements
  • When deploying Claroty xDome for the first time and performing initial asset discovery and risk assessment
  • When correlating newly published ICS-CERT advisories against your OT asset inventory
  • When prioritizing OT vulnerability remediation with limited maintenance windows
  • When generating compliance evidence for CIP-010-4 vulnerability assessment requirements

Do not use for active vulnerability scanning of PLCs and safety systems (see performing-ot-network-security-assessment for passive approaches), for IT-only vulnerability management (see standard vulnerability scanners), or for penetration testing (see performing-ics-penetration-testing).

Prerequisites

  • Claroty xDome or CTD (Continuous Threat Detection) deployed with sensors on OT network
  • Network SPAN/TAP access for passive asset discovery
  • CISA ICS-CERT advisory subscription for vulnerability tracking
  • Asset inventory with firmware versions for all OT devices
  • Change management process for patch deployment during maintenance windows

Workflow

Step 1: Configure Asset Discovery and Vulnerability Correlation

Configure Claroty to perform passive and active-safe discovery to build complete asset inventory with firmware versions for vulnerability correlation.

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""OT Vulnerability Assessment Manager.

Correlates OT asset inventory with ICS-CERT advisories and CVE data
to identify, prioritize, and track OT vulnerabilities. Designed to
integrate with Claroty xDome API or standalone operation.
"""

import json
import sys
from collections import defaultdict
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, asdict
from datetime import datetime

import requests

@dataclass
class OTAsset:
    asset_id: str
    name: str
    vendor: str
    model: str
    firmware_version: str
    asset_type: str  # PLC, HMI, RTU, historian, switch, etc.
    purdue_level: str
    ip_address: str
    protocol: str
    criticality: str  # critical, high, medium, low
    zone: str

@dataclass
class OTVulnerability:
    vuln_id: str
    cve_id: str
    title: str
    severity: str  # critical, high, medium, low
    cvss_score: float
    affected_vendor: str
    affected_product: str
    affected_versions: str
    description: str
    ics_cert_advisory: str = ""
    remediation: str = ""
    patch_available: bool = False
    compensating_controls: str = ""

@dataclass
class RiskAssessment:
    asset: OTAsset
    vulnerability: OTVulnerability
    risk_score: float = 0.0
    risk_rating: str = ""
    exploitability: str = ""
    operational_impact: str = ""
    compensating_controls: list = field(default_factory=list)
    remediation_priority: int = 0

class OTVulnerabilityAssessment:
    """OT vulnerability assessment and prioritization engine."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.assets = []
        self.vulnerabilities = []
        self.risk_assessments = []

    def load_assets(self, assets_data):
        """Load asset inventory from Claroty export or manual inventory."""
        for a in assets_data:
            self.assets.append(OTAsset(**a))
        print(f"[*] Loaded {len(self.assets)} OT assets")

    def fetch_ics_advisories(self):
        """Fetch latest ICS-CERT advisories from CISA."""
        print("[*] Fetching ICS-CERT advisories from CISA...")
        try:
            # CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
            url = "https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
            resp = requests.get(url, timeout=30)
            resp.raise_for_status()
            data = resp.json()

            ics_vulns = []
            for vuln in data.get("vulnerabilities", []):
                # Filter for ICS-relevant vendors
                ics_vendors = [
                    "siemens", "schneider", "rockwell", "honeywell",
                    "abb", "ge", "emerson", "yokogawa", "omron",
                    "mitsubishi", "phoenix", "moxa", "advantech",
                ]
                vendor = vuln.get("vendorProject", "").lower()
                if any(v in vendor for v in ics_vendors):
                    ics_vulns.append(vuln)

            print(f"  Found {len(ics_vulns)} ICS-relevant known exploited vulnerabilities")
            return ics_vulns

        except Exception as e:
            print(f"[WARN] Could not fetch advisories: {e}")
            return []

    def correlate_vulnerabilities(self):
        """Match vulnerabilities to assets based on vendor/model/firmware."""
        print("[*] Correlating vulnerabilities to assets...")

        for asset in self.assets:
            for vuln in self.vulnerabilities:
                if (vuln.affected_vendor.lower() in asset.vendor.lower() and
                    vuln.affected_product.lower() in asset.model.lower()):
                    # Check firmware version if specified
                    ra = RiskAssessment(asset=asset, vulnerability=vuln)
                    self._calculate_risk_score(ra)
                    self.risk_assessments.append(ra)

        print(f"  Correlated {len(self.risk_assessments)} asset-vulnerability pairs")

    def _calculate_risk_score(self, ra):
        """Calculate OT-specific risk score considering operational impact."""
        # Base score from CVSS
        base = ra.vulnerability.cvss_score

        # Criticality multiplier based on asset function
        criticality_weights = {
            "critical": 1.5,  # SIS, safety systems
            "high": 1.3,      # PLCs, primary control
            "medium": 1.0,    # HMIs, historians
            "low": 0.7,       # non-critical support systems
        }
        criticality = criticality_weights.get(ra.asset.criticality, 1.0)

        # Purdue level proximity factor (lower levels = higher risk)
        level_weights = {
            "Level 0-1": 1.5,
            "Level 2": 1.3,
            "Level 3": 1.0,
            "Level 3.5": 0.8,
            "Level 4": 0.6,
        }
        level_factor = level_weights.get(ra.asset.purdue_level, 1.0)

        # Network exposure reduction if compensating controls exist
        comp_reduction = 0.8 if ra.compensating_controls else 1.0

        ra.risk_score = round(base * criticality * level_factor * comp_reduction, 1)
        ra.risk_score = min(ra.risk_score, 10.0)

        if ra.risk_score >= 9.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "critical"
            ra.remediation_priority = 1
        elif ra.risk_score >= 7.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "high"
            ra.remediation_priority = 2
        elif ra.risk_score >= 4.0:
            ra.risk_rating = "medium"
            ra.remediation_priority = 3
        else:
            ra.risk_rating = "low"
            ra.remediation_priority = 4

    def generate_report(self):
        """Generate vulnerability assessment report."""
        # Sort by risk score descending
        sorted_ra = sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)

        report = []
        report.append("=" * 70)
        report.append("OT VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT")
        report.append(f"Date: {datetime.now().isoformat()}")
        report.append(f"Assets: {len(self.assets)} | Vulnerabilities: {len(self.vulnerabilities)}")
        report.append(f"Risk Assessments: {len(self.risk_assessments)}")
        report.append("=" * 70)

        for sev in ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]:
            findings = [ra for ra in sorted_ra if ra.risk_rating == sev]
            if findings:
                report.append(f"\n--- {sev.upper()} RISK ({len(findings)}) ---")
                for ra in findings[:10]:
                    report.append(f"\n  Risk Score: {ra.risk_score}/10.0")
                    report.append(f"  Asset: {ra.asset.name} ({ra.asset.vendor} {ra.asset.model})")
                    report.append(f"  Zone: {ra.asset.zone} ({ra.asset.purdue_level})")
                    report.append(f"  CVE: {ra.vulnerability.cve_id} (CVSS: {ra.vulnerability.cvss_score})")
                    report.append(f"  Title: {ra.vulnerability.title}")
                    if ra.vulnerability.patch_available:
                        report.append(f"  Patch: Available - schedule for next maintenance window")
                    else:
                        report.append(f"  Patch: Not available - apply compensating controls")

        return "\n".join(report)

    def export_json(self, output_file):
        """Export assessment to JSON."""
        data = {
            "assessment_date": datetime.now().isoformat(),
            "asset_count": len(self.assets),
            "vulnerability_count": len(self.vulnerabilities),
            "risk_assessments": [
                {
                    "asset_name": ra.asset.name,
                    "asset_ip": ra.asset.ip_address,
                    "cve": ra.vulnerability.cve_id,
                    "risk_score": ra.risk_score,
                    "risk_rating": ra.risk_rating,
                    "priority": ra.remediation_priority,
                }
                for ra in sorted(self.risk_assessments, key=lambda x: -x.risk_score)
            ],
        }
        with open(output_file, "w") as f:
            json.dump(data, f, indent=2)

if __name__ == "__main__":
    assessment = OTVulnerabilityAssessment()
    advisories = assessment.fetch_ics_advisories()
    print(f"Fetched {len(advisories)} ICS advisories from CISA KEV catalog")

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Claroty xDomeCyber-physical systems protection platform providing asset discovery, vulnerability management, and threat detection for OT/IoT environments
Passive DiscoveryIdentifying OT assets by analyzing network traffic without sending any packets, safe for production environments
Safe Active QueryQuerying OT devices using native industrial protocols at safe rates to collect detailed asset information without disrupting operations
OT Risk ScoreRisk rating that factors CVSS base score, asset criticality, Purdue level, and compensating controls for OT-appropriate prioritization
ICS-CERT AdvisoryCISA-published security advisories for industrial control system vulnerabilities with vendor-specific remediation guidance
Virtual PatchingDeploying IPS/firewall rules to block exploitation of known vulnerabilities when firmware patches cannot be immediately applied

Tools & Systems

  • Claroty xDome: Comprehensive OT/IoT asset discovery, vulnerability management, and continuous threat detection platform
  • Claroty CTD: Continuous Threat Detection sensor for passive network monitoring in OT environments
  • CISA ICS-CERT: US government advisory service publishing ICS vulnerability notifications and mitigation guidance
  • Dragos Platform: Alternative OT security platform with asset visibility and vulnerability management capabilities
  • Nozomi Networks Guardian: OT monitoring platform with vulnerability correlation and risk scoring

Output Format

OT Vulnerability Assessment Report
=====================================
Tool: Claroty xDome / Manual Assessment
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Assets Scanned: [N]

RISK SUMMARY:
  Critical Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  High Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  Medium Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets
  Low Risk: [N] vulnerabilities on [N] assets

TOP RISKS:
  [Risk Score] [CVE-ID] on [Asset Name] ([Zone])
    Remediation: [Patch/Compensating Control]
    Timeline: [Next maintenance window / Immediate]

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.6%
按下载量换算24

Claude

31.55%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

18.65%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.32%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills