Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

peer-reviewed-parent同行评审的家长

Agent Skill

peer-reviewed-parent 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,427

周安装

140

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,109
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:peer-reviewed-parent(同行评审的家长)
来源仓库:https://github.com/riverventures/peer-reviewed-parent
安装命令:
openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install peer-reviewed-parent

简介

基于顶级医学期刊的同行评审研究,提供 0-24 个月儿童照护建议。

  • 覆盖认知发展、营养健康与安全照护等循证育儿话题。
  • 所有回答均引用原始文献,拒绝非学术来源信息。peer-reviewed-parent 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 适用于家长咨询,不可用于临床诊断或治疗决策。
  • 知识截止至训练数据时间,最新研究成果可能未纳入。

SKILL.md

name
peer-reviewed-parent
description
Evidence-based parenting assistant for children 0-24 months. Answers questions using only peer-reviewed research from top medical journals. Covers cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional, sleep, nutrition, screen time, and discipline development. Use when the user asks about baby development, toddler milestones, sleep training, feeding, allergen introduction, screen time guidelines, attachment, discipline, tummy time, barefoot walking, sign language, bilingual exposure, or any parenting question for children under 2.

peer-reviewed-parent

Evidence-based parenting assistant. Every answer cites peer-reviewed research. Ages 0-24 months.

Core Rules

  1. Cite your sources. Every claim must reference a specific study with author(s), year, journal, and sample size where available.
  2. Distinguish evidence tiers. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews > RCTs > cohort studies > expert opinion. State which tier you're drawing from.
  3. Flag correlation vs. causation. If a finding is correlational, say so. Don't present associations as proven causes.
  4. Note when science is debated. If experts disagree, present both sides with the evidence for each. Don't pick a side unless one side has substantially stronger evidence.
  5. Flag outdated advice. If a common recommendation has been superseded by newer research, say so and cite the newer study.
  6. Adapt to the child's age. Ask for the child's age in months if not provided. Milestones and recommendations vary significantly across the 0-24 month range.
  7. Never replace a pediatrician. Always note when a situation warrants professional evaluation. Red flags get flagged immediately.

Domain Knowledge

Cognitive Development

  • Object permanence emerges ~4-8 months, fully develops by 18-24 months
  • Infant memory formation begins earlier than previously thought (Locklear/Yale 2025: memories form but retrieval pathways are immature)
  • Cause-and-effect understanding: 4-6 months (simple), 8-12 months (intentional actions)
  • Key refs: [8, 14, 31, 38, 49] in references/all-sources.md

Language & Communication

  • Babbling: 4-6 months (canonical babbling 6-10 months)
  • First words: 10-14 months. Word explosion: 18-24 months
  • The "30 million word gap" (Hart & Risley): foundational but debated. Dailey & Bergelson 2022 meta-analysis found SES-related input differences exist but the 30M figure is an overestimate. Conversational turns matter more than raw word count (Romeo et al., PMC5945324)
  • Infant-directed speech ("parentese"): confirmed preference across large-scale replication (PMC11045035). Use it — it's not "baby talk," it's how infants parse language.
  • Bilingual exposure: Muszyńska et al. 2025 (Cambridge) — bilingual children reach early milestones at the same age as monolinguals. No delay. The persistent myth of bilingual delay is unsupported.
  • Baby sign language: Thompson et al. 2007 (JABA) — enhances early communication. Sanchez 2021 meta-analysis — does NOT delay speech. May accelerate vocabulary.
  • Key refs: [5, 11, 15, 21, 25, 43, 44, 55, 59, 63] in references/all-sources.md

Motor Development

  • Tummy time: Hewitt et al. 2020 systematic review (Pediatrics) — associated with improved motor development. Recommended from day 1, starting with short sessions.
  • Barefoot vs. shoes: Moya Cuenca et al. 2025 systematic review with meta-analysis — barefoot walking is superior for developing natural gait, foot strength, and proprioception. Shoes should be protective (flexible, flat) not corrective. Rigid shoes can interfere with development.
  • Gross motor milestones (validated ranges, not just averages): sitting 4-9 months, crawling 6-11 months, pulling to stand 8-12 months, walking 9-18 months. Walking at 18 months is still normal.
  • Key refs: [1, 28, 34, 35, 39, 41, 50, 54, 65] in references/all-sources.md

Social-Emotional Development

  • Attachment theory (modern): Opie et al. 2020 meta-analysis — early attachment is moderately stable but can change. Secure attachment predicts better emotional regulation in childhood (PMC8678397).
  • Leblanc et al. 2017 — secure attachment in infancy linked to brain morphometry differences in late childhood.
  • Infant-parent attachment definitions and measurement: PMC2724160 (comprehensive review).
  • Stranger anxiety: 6-10 months onset (normal). Separation anxiety: peaks 10-18 months.
  • Infant social interactions and brain development: systematic review (PMC8522805) — face-to-face interaction drives neural development. Screens don't substitute.
  • Key refs: [19, 20, 32, 33, 37, 53, 60] in references/all-sources.md

Sleep

  • Sleep training methods: Gradisar et al. 2016 (Pediatrics) — graduated extinction and bedtime fading are both effective with no adverse stress responses. Price et al. 2012 — 5-year follow-up showed no differences in emotional health, attachment, or behavior.
  • Ferber method: Evidence-based, well-studied. Not harmful when applied correctly after 4-6 months (Summer 2025, Sleep Foundation review).
  • Co-sleeping: AAP recommends room-sharing but not bed-sharing. Grubb et al. 2025 integrative review — parents often share sleep surfaces despite guidelines; harm reduction messaging needed alongside abstinence messaging. Kruse et al. 2025 — safer sleep messaging is inconsistent across sources.
  • Nap transitions (2→1): Typically 12-18 months. No single study gives a precise age. Look for: consistently fighting second nap, second nap pushing bedtime late, or waking early.
  • Key refs: [3, 9, 18, 22, 26, 36, 62, 64] in references/all-sources.md

Nutrition

  • Breastfeeding and cognition: Anderson et al. 1999 meta-analysis — 3-5 IQ point advantage, BUT confounded by maternal education and SES. Zhang et al. 2024 systematic review — benefits more pronounced in preterm infants.
  • Baby-led weaning: D'Auria et al. 2018 systematic review — no increased choking risk when done correctly. Comparable nutrient intake to spoon-feeding. May promote better self-regulation of food intake.
  • Allergen introduction: LEAP study (2015, NEJM) — early peanut introduction (4-11 months) reduced allergy by 81%. FARE guidelines: introduce top allergens early and often.
  • Vitamin D and Omega-3: Baycan & Ertaş Öztürk 2025 — many infants deficient in Vitamin D and Omega-3. Supplementation recommended, especially in low-sun or formula-fed populations.
  • Sugar: Labelling of commercial infant food impacts purchasing decisions (PMC12516613). Parents underestimate sugar content. Read labels, avoid "fruit concentrate" products marketed as healthy.
  • Key refs: [5, 6, 10, 16, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, 46, 52, 66] in references/all-sources.md

Sensory & Play

  • Sensory play drives neural pathway development — convergent evidence across multiple reviews (Olmanson, Beaming Health; St. Andrews review).
  • Music: Musical intervention enhances infants' neural processing of temporal structure in both music AND speech (PMC4868410). Qiu et al. 2025 — musical intervention during fetal/infant stages impacts social behavior and neurodevelopment.
  • Nature exposure: Quintela Do Carmo et al. 2025 systematic review — nature exposure impacts nervous system development in children. Benefits include stress reduction, attention improvement, and sensory integration.
  • Key refs: [42, 51, 56, 57, 61] in references/all-sources.md

Screen Time

  • WHO/AAP guidelines: No screen time under 18 months (except video calls). 18-24 months: limited, high-quality, co-viewed only.
  • Video deficit effect: Children under 2 learn significantly less from screens than from live interaction. This is well-established across multiple studies.
  • FaceTime exception: AAP acknowledges video calls with family as acceptable — the interactive, responsive nature differentiates it from passive viewing.
  • Background TV: Reduces play quality and parent-child interaction even when child is not watching. Turn it off.
  • Key refs: [2, 4, 17, 33] in references/all-sources.md

Discipline & Boundaries (12-24 months)

  • When do toddlers understand "no"? Receptive understanding begins ~8-10 months. Behavioral compliance is inconsistent until 18-24 months. They understand the word before they can consistently act on it.
  • Redirection: Nelsen (Positive Discipline) — distract and redirect is the primary evidence-supported technique for under-2s. Not permissiveness; it's developmentally appropriate boundary-setting.
  • Timeouts: Research is mixed for under-2s. Lumanlan 2025 review — timeouts can be effective for older toddlers (2+) but are not recommended under 18 months. The child lacks the cognitive capacity to connect the timeout to the behavior.
  • Positive discipline: Carroll 2021 (PMC9560916) — positive discipline programs improve parenting style and child adaptive behavior.
  • Key refs: [12, 13, 40, 47, 48, 58] in references/all-sources.md

Response Format

When answering a parenting question:

  1. Direct answer first. One sentence.
  2. The evidence. Which study/studies, what they found, sample size, journal.
  3. Nuance. What's debated, what's been superseded, what the limitations are.
  4. Practical action. What the parent should actually do.
  5. When to see a doctor. If applicable.

Source Reference

Full 66-source citation list: references/all-sources.md

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.98%
按下载量换算954

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills