Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

test测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

7,080

周安装

298

GitHub Stars

3,696

下载量

2,479
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test(测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
仓库路径:skills/test
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 --skill test
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 --skill test

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。

  • 适用于研究检索类任务,支持测试相关的信息整理与分析。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和联网能力。
  • 使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。
  • test 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

/test - Testing Workflow

Run comprehensive test suite with parallel execution.

When to Use

  • "Run all tests"
  • "Test the feature"
  • "Verify everything works"
  • "Full test suite"
  • Before releases or merges
  • After major changes

Workflow Overview

┌─────────────┐      ┌───────────┐
│ diagnostics │ ──▶  │ arbiter  │ ─┐
│ (type check)│      │ (unit)    │  │
└─────────────┘      └───────────┘  │
                                    ├──▶ ┌─────────┐
                     ┌───────────┐  │    │  atlas  │
                     │  arbiter  │ ─┘    │ (e2e)   │
                     │ (integ)   │       └─────────┘
                     └───────────┘

  Pre-flight         Parallel              Sequential
  (~1 second)        fast tests            slow tests

Agent Sequence

#AgentRoleExecution
1arbiterUnit tests, type checks, lintingParallel
1arbiterIntegration testsParallel
2atlasE2E/acceptance testsAfter 1 passes

Why This Order?

  1. Fast feedback: Unit tests fail fast
  2. Parallel efficiency: No dependency between unit and integration
  3. E2E gating: Only run slow E2E tests if faster tests pass

Execution

Phase 0: Pre-flight Diagnostics (NEW)

Before running tests, check for type errors - they often cause test failures:

tldr diagnostics . --project --format text 2>/dev/null | grep "^E " | head -10

Why diagnostics first?

  • Type check is instant (~1s), tests take longer
  • Diagnostics show ROOT CAUSE, tests show symptoms
  • "Expected int, got str" is clearer than "AttributeError at line 50"
  • Catches errors in untested code paths

If errors found: Fix them BEFORE running tests. Type errors usually mean tests will fail anyway.

If clean: Proceed to Phase 1.

Phase 0.5: Change Impact (Optional)

For large test suites, find only affected tests:

tldr change-impact --session
# or for explicit files:
tldr change-impact src/changed_file.py

This returns which tests to run based on what changed. Skip this for small projects or when you want full coverage.

Phase 1: Parallel Tests

# Run both in parallel
Task(
  subagent_type="arbiter",
  prompt="""
  Run unit tests for: [SCOPE]

  Include:
  - Unit tests
  - Type checking
  - Linting

  Report: Pass/fail count, failures detail
  """,
  run_in_background=true
)

Task(
  subagent_type="arbiter",
  prompt="""
  Run integration tests for: [SCOPE]

  Include:
  - Integration tests
  - API tests
  - Database tests

  Report: Pass/fail count, failures detail
  """,
  run_in_background=true
)

# Wait for both
[Check TaskOutput for both]

Phase 2: E2E Tests (If Phase 1 Passes)

Task(
  subagent_type="atlas",
  prompt="""
  Run E2E tests for: [SCOPE]

  Include:
  - End-to-end flows
  - Acceptance tests
  - UI tests if applicable

  Report: Pass/fail count, screenshots on failure
  """
)

Test Scopes

Full Suite

User: /test
→ All unit + integration + E2E tests

Feature Scope

User: /test authentication
→ Only auth-related tests

Quick Check

User: /test --quick
→ Only unit tests (skip integration and E2E)

Example

User: /test the new payment feature

Claude: Starting /test workflow for payment feature...

Phase 0: Pre-flight diagnostics...
$ tldr diagnostics . --project --format text | grep "^E "
(no type errors found)

Phase 1: Running parallel tests...
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ arbiter: Running unit tests...          │
│ arbiter: Running integration tests...   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

arbiter: ✅ 45/45 unit tests passing
arbiter: ✅ 12/12 integration tests passing

Phase 2: Running E2E tests...
atlas: ✅ 8/8 E2E tests passing

Test Summary:
┌─────────────┬─────────┬────────┐
│ Type        │ Passed  │ Failed │
├─────────────┼─────────┼────────┤
│ Unit        │ 45      │ 0      │
│ Integration │ 12      │ 0      │
│ E2E         │ 8       │ 0      │
├─────────────┼─────────┼────────┤
│ TOTAL       │ 65      │ 0      │
└─────────────┴─────────┴────────┘

All tests passing! ✅

Example with Type Errors

User: /test

Claude: Starting /test workflow...

Phase 0: Pre-flight diagnostics...
$ tldr diagnostics . --project --format text | grep "^E "
E src/payment.py:45:12: Argument of type 'str' not assignable to 'int'
E src/refund.py:23:8: Return type 'None' not assignable to 'float'

Found 2 type errors. Fixing before running tests...

[Claude fixes the type errors]

Re-running diagnostics... clean.

Phase 1: Running parallel tests...

Failure Handling

If Phase 1 fails:

arbiter: ❌ 43/45 tests passing

2 failures:
- test_payment_validation: expected 'invalid' got 'valid'
- test_refund_calculation: off by $0.01

Stopping workflow. Fix failures before running E2E tests.

Flags

  • --quick: Unit tests only
  • --no-e2e: Skip E2E tests
  • --coverage: Include coverage report
  • --watch: Re-run on file changes

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

29.58%
按下载量换算733

OpenCode

25.27%
按下载量换算626

Codex

15.85%
按下载量换算393

Gemini CLI

13.32%
按下载量换算330

Cursor

8.28%
按下载量换算205

windsurf

3.11%
按下载量换算77

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills