Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

pain-language-engagers痛苦语言参与者

Agent Skill

pain-language-engagers 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

245

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

607

下载量

78
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pain-language-engagers(痛苦语言参与者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/pain-language-engagers
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-language-engagers
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill pain-language-engagers

简介

pain-language-engagers 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Pain-Language Engagers

Find warm leads by scraping LinkedIn for pain-language posts and their engagers. People who write about, react to, or comment on posts expressing operational frustrations are signaling they live with a problem your product solves. This skill turns those signals into a qualified lead list.

Core principle: Search for pain-language, not solution-language. Solution keywords ("AI automation", "workflow optimization") attract builders and VCs. Pain keywords ("can't find drivers", "check calls are killing us") attract operators living with the problem.

Phase 0: Intake

Before generating keywords or running anything, ask the user these questions. Present them as a numbered list and tell the user to answer what's relevant and skip what's not.

Product & Pain Context

  1. What does your product/service do in one sentence?
  2. What specific problem does it solve? Who feels this pain most acutely?
  3. What does your ICP's day-to-day look like WITHOUT your product? (The frustrations, workarounds, manual processes)
  4. What phrases would someone use when complaining about this problem on LinkedIn? (e.g., "check calls are killing us", "can't find drivers", "spending hours on manual data entry")

ICP Definition

  1. What industries/verticals are your target buyers in?
  2. What job titles or roles are your ideal buyers? (e.g., "VP Operations", "Broker owner", "Head of Logistics")
  3. What titles should be EXCLUDED? (e.g., "Software Engineer", "AI researcher")
  4. Any specific competitors whose employees should be filtered out?
  5. Geographic focus? (e.g., "United States only", "global")

LinkedIn Signal Sources

  1. Any LinkedIn company pages where your ICP is likely to engage? (Industry publications, communities, competitor pages)
  2. Any specific LinkedIn posts or content creators your ICP follows?

Phase 1: Generate Pain-Language Keywords

Based on the intake answers, generate ~15-25 pain-language keywords in LinkedIn boolean search syntax. Organize into categories:

  • Staffing/Resource Pain — hiring difficulties, turnover, burnout
  • Operational Friction — manual processes, missed SLAs, communication breakdowns
  • Margin/Growth Pain — cost pressure, scaling challenges
  • Process Complaints — specific workflow frustrations

Key principle: Every keyword should be something a frustrated operator would actually type or say, not marketing language or solution framing.

Also generate:

  • ICP keyword list — industry terms for ICP classification (from answer #5)
  • Tech vendor exclusion list — competitor names + generic tech titles (from answers #7, #8)
  • Pain-pattern regexes — for filtering company page posts (derived from the keywords)
  • Broad topic patterns — industry terms for known industry page filtering
  • Hardcoded company pages — from answer #10, plus any the agent suggests based on the industry

Present the full keyword list to the user for approval/refinement before running. This is the most critical step — bad keywords = bad leads.

Once approved, save the complete config as JSON:

# Save config
skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/{client-name}.json

Config JSON structure:

{
  "client_name": "example-client",
  "pain_keywords": ["\"can't find X\"", "\"hiring Y\" problems"],
  "pain_patterns": ["can.t find X", "hiring Y", "manual.*process"],
  "icp_keywords": ["industry-term-1", "industry-term-2"],
  "tech_vendor_keywords": ["software engineer", "competitor-name"],
  "hardcoded_companies": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/example/"],
  "industry_pages": ["https://www.linkedin.com/company/example/"],
  "broad_topic_patterns": ["industry", "sector", "niche-term"],
  "country_filter": "United States",
  "days_back": 60,
  "max_posts_per_keyword": 50,
  "max_posts_per_company": 100
}

Phase 2: Run LinkedIn Scraping Pipeline

Execute the pipeline script with the saved config:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/{client-name}.json \
  [--test] [--companies "url1,url2"]

Flags:

  • --config (required) — path to the client config JSON
  • --test — limit to 3 keywords, 5 posts per company (for validation)
  • --skip-discovery — skip keyword search, only scrape hardcoded/extra companies
  • --companies "url1,url2" — add extra company URLs to scrape

What the script does:

  1. Keyword searchharvestapi/linkedin-post-search for each pain keyword
  2. Post author extraction — People who wrote pain posts = direct leads (free, no API call)
  3. Company page discovery — Extract company pages from keyword results
  4. Company page engager scrapingharvestapi/linkedin-company-posts for each company page, pain-filtered
  5. Profile enrichmentsupreme_coder/linkedin-profile-scraper for all profiles (gets headline + location)
  6. ICP classification — Using the client-specific ICP/vendor keyword lists from config
  7. Dedup + CSV export

Cost estimate:

  • Keyword search: $0.10 per keyword ($2 for 20 keywords)
  • Company page scraping: $0.002 per post per company ($0.20 per company)
  • Profile enrichment: ~$0.003 per profile
  • Full run with 20 keywords + 10 companies: ~$5-10

Always run with --test first to validate the config produces relevant results before a full run.

Phase 3: Review & Refine

After the script completes, present results to the user:

  • ICP breakdown — counts by tier (Likely / Possible / Unknown / Tech Vendor)
  • Top 15 Likely ICP leads — name, role, company, engagement type
  • Sample of filtered-out leads — so user can catch false negatives
  • Keyword performance — which keywords produced the most leads, which were duds

If the user wants adjustments:

  1. Update the config JSON (add/remove keywords, adjust ICP lists)
  2. Re-run the script
  3. Repeat until the user is satisfied

Common adjustments:

  • Too many Tech Vendor results — add more vendor names to tech_vendor_keywords
  • Missing obvious ICP leads — add more industry terms to icp_keywords
  • Irrelevant posts — refine pain_patterns to be more specific
  • Not enough results — add more keywords or reduce days_back constraint

Phase 4: Output

CSV exported to skills/pain-language-engagers/output/{client-name}-{date}.csv with columns:

ColumnDescription
NameFull name
LinkedIn Profile URLProfile link
RoleParsed from headline
Company NameParsed from headline
LocationFrom profile enrichment
Source PageWhich company page(s) they engaged on
Post URL(s)Links to the post(s) they engaged with
Engagement TypePost Author, Comment, or Reaction
Comment TextTheir comment (if applicable — personalization gold)
ICP TierLikely ICP, Possible ICP, Unknown, or Tech Vendor
Niche KeywordWhich pain keyword matched

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — set as APIFY_API_TOKEN in .env
  • Apify actors used:

- harvestapi/linkedin-post-search (keyword search) - harvestapi/linkedin-company-posts (company page scraping) - supreme_coder/linkedin-profile-scraper (profile enrichment)

Example Usage

Trigger phrases:

  • "Find people complaining about [problem] on LinkedIn"
  • "LinkedIn pain-based prospecting for [product]"
  • "Find leads who are discussing [pain point]"
  • "Scrape LinkedIn for [industry] pain posts"
  • "Run the pain-language engagers pipeline for [client]"

With existing config:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/happy-robot.json

Test mode:

python3 skills/pain-language-engagers/scripts/pain_language_engagers.py \
  --config skills/pain-language-engagers/configs/happy-robot.json --test

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.87%
按下载量换算26

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

18.78%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.9%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills