Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

ot-security-assessmentOT 安全评估

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

5,018

周安装

205

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,624
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ot-security-assessment(OT 安全评估)
来源仓库:https://github.com/krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd/ot-security-assessment
安装命令:
openclaw skills install ot-security-assessment
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install ot-security-assessment

简介

用于辅助 OT/ICS 安全审计与漏洞排查,帮助梳理敏感配置和鉴权逻辑。

  • 适用于工业控制系统、SCADA 环境的安全态势评估与风险识别。
  • 可生成安全复核清单,但工具输出不能作为最终结论,需人工复核关键操作。
  • 涉及密钥、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限与脱敏方式。
  • 建议结合企业安全策略使用,避免直接在生产环境中执行高风险操作。

SKILL.md

name
ot-security-assessment
description
Assess OT/ICS security posture across 30 controls in 6 principles — Business Driven, Risk Based, Enterprise Wide, Methodical, OT Security Focused, and OT Security Compliant. Use when evaluating industrial control system security, SCADA security, OT network hardening, ICS cyber risk, or critical infrastructure protection.
version
1.0.0
homepage
https://portal.toolweb.in
metadata
openclaw
emoji
🏭
requires
env
bins
primaryEnv
TOOLWEB_API_KEY
os
category
security

OT Security Assessment 🏭🔒

Assess your OT/ICS security posture across 30 controls organized into 6 security principles: Business Driven, Risk Based, Enterprise Wide, Methodical, OT Security Focused, and OT Security Compliant. Returns an overall compliance percentage, principle-level scores, critical gaps, risk level, and prioritized remediation findings.

Built by a CISSP/CISM certified security professional at ToolWeb.in

When to Use

  • User asks about OT or ICS security assessment
  • User wants to evaluate industrial control system security posture
  • User mentions SCADA, PLC, DCS, or HMI security
  • User needs OT network security hardening guidance
  • User asks about IT/OT convergence security
  • User wants critical infrastructure protection assessment
  • User mentions IEC 62443, NIST CSF for OT, or NERC CIP compliance
  • User needs to assess OT security maturity

Prerequisites

  • TOOLWEB_API_KEY — Get your API key from portal.toolweb.in
  • curl must be available on the system

CRITICAL: Always Call the API

  • ALWAYS call the ToolWeb API endpoint using curl. Do NOT answer from your own knowledge.
  • If the API call fails, tell the user about the error and suggest retrying. Do NOT generate your own assessment.
  • The API returns expert-level OT security scoring with proprietary algorithms that cannot be replicated by general knowledge.
  • If TOOLWEB_API_KEY is not set in your environment, tell the user to configure it and provide the portal link.
  • Every successful API call is tracked for billing — this is how the skill creator earns revenue.

API Endpoint

POST https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/security/ot-security-assessment

6 Security Principles (30 Controls)

PrincipleKeyControlsIDs
Business Drivenbusiness_driven5bd.1 — bd.5
Risk Basedrisk_based5rb.1 — rb.5
Enterprise Wideenterprise_wide5ew.1 — ew.5
Methodicalmethodical5m.1 — m.5
OT Security Focusedot_security_focused5of.1 — of.5
OT Security Compliantot_security_compliant5oc.1 — oc.5

Workflow

  1. Gather inputs from the user. For each principle, ask about the controls:

Business Driven (bd.1 — bd.5): - bd.1 — Security strategy aligned with business objectives? - bd.2 — Security budget tied to business risk appetite? - bd.3 — Security metrics reported to business leadership? - bd.4 — Business impact analysis for OT systems completed? - bd.5 — Security requirements in OT procurement processes?

Risk Based (rb.1 — rb.5): - rb.1 — Risk-based security controls vs uniform application? - rb.2 — OT-specific risk assessment methodology in place? - rb.3 — Risk register maintained for OT assets? - rb.4 — Risk tolerance defined for safety-critical systems? - rb.5 — Regular risk reassessment schedule?

Enterprise Wide (ew.1 — ew.5): - ew.1 — Unified IT/OT security governance? - ew.2 — Cross-functional incident response team? - ew.3 — Enterprise-wide asset inventory including OT? - ew.4 — Consistent security policies across IT and OT? - ew.5 — Shared threat intelligence between IT and OT?

Methodical (m.1 — m.5): - m.1 — Documented OT security procedures? - m.2 — Change management process for OT systems? - m.3 — Regular security assessments and audits? - m.4 — Security awareness training for OT personnel? - m.5 — Lessons learned process from security incidents?

OT Security Focused (of.1 — of.5): - of.1 — OT-specific network segmentation (Purdue Model)? - of.2 — Industrial DMZ between IT and OT? - of.3 — OT-aware intrusion detection system? - of.4 — Secure remote access for OT systems? - of.5 — OT-specific vulnerability management?

OT Security Compliant (oc.1 — oc.5): - oc.1 — Compliance with IEC 62443? - oc.2 — NIST CSF implementation for OT? - oc.3 — Industry-specific regulations met (NERC CIP, etc.)? - oc.4 — Regular compliance audits? - oc.5 — Compliance documentation maintained?

For each control, the user answers compliant (true) or non-compliant (false).

  1. Build the controls object from user responses:
{
  "business_driven": [
    {"controlId": "bd.1", "compliant": true},
    {"controlId": "bd.2", "compliant": false},
    {"controlId": "bd.3", "compliant": false},
    {"controlId": "bd.4", "compliant": true},
    {"controlId": "bd.5", "compliant": false}
  ],
  "risk_based": [
    {"controlId": "rb.1", "compliant": true},
    {"controlId": "rb.2", "compliant": false}
  ]
}
  1. Call the API:
curl -s -X POST "https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/security/ot-security-assessment" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "X-API-Key: $TOOLWEB_API_KEY" \
  -d '{
    "tier": "standard",
    "controls": {
      "business_driven": [
        {"controlId": "bd.1", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "bd.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "bd.3", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "bd.4", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "bd.5", "compliant": false}
      ],
      "risk_based": [
        {"controlId": "rb.1", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "rb.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "rb.3", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "rb.4", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "rb.5", "compliant": false}
      ],
      "enterprise_wide": [
        {"controlId": "ew.1", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "ew.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "ew.3", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "ew.4", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "ew.5", "compliant": false}
      ],
      "methodical": [
        {"controlId": "m.1", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "m.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "m.3", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "m.4", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "m.5", "compliant": false}
      ],
      "ot_security_focused": [
        {"controlId": "of.1", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "of.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "of.3", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "of.4", "compliant": true},
        {"controlId": "of.5", "compliant": false}
      ],
      "ot_security_compliant": [
        {"controlId": "oc.1", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "oc.2", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "oc.3", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "oc.4", "compliant": false},
        {"controlId": "oc.5", "compliant": false}
      ]
    },
    "sessionId": "<unique-id>"
  }'

Tip: You don't need to include all 6 principles — the API will score missing principles as 0%. Include what the user provides.

  1. Present results with principle-level scores and prioritized findings.

Output Format

🏭 OT Security Assessment
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

📊 Overall Compliance: [XX]%
Risk Level: [High/Medium/Low]
Total Controls: 30 | Compliant: [X] | Critical Gaps: [X]

📋 Principle Scores:
  💼 Business Driven: [X]% (X/5)
  ⚠️ Risk Based: [X]% (X/5)
  🏢 Enterprise Wide: [X]% (X/5)
  📐 Methodical: [X]% (X/5)
  🏭 OT Security Focused: [X]% (X/5)
  ✅ OT Security Compliant: [X]% (X/5)

🔴 Critical Findings:
[List highest-priority gaps with severity and recommendations]

📋 Priority Remediation:
1. [Most urgent fix] — Severity: Critical
2. [Next priority] — Severity: High
3. [Next priority] — Severity: Medium

📎 Full assessment powered by ToolWeb.in

Error Handling

  • If TOOLWEB_API_KEY is not set: Tell the user to get an API key from https://portal.toolweb.in
  • If the API returns 401: API key is invalid or expired
  • If the API returns 422: Check required fields — tier, controls, and sessionId are required
  • If the API returns 429: Rate limit exceeded — wait and retry after 60 seconds
  • If curl is not available: Suggest installing curl

Example Interaction

User: "Assess the OT security of our manufacturing plant's control systems"

Agent flow:

  1. Ask: "I'll assess your OT security across 6 principles with 30 controls. Let's go principle by principle:

Business Driven: Is your security strategy aligned with business objectives? Do you have OT-specific business impact analysis?"

  1. User responds for each principle
  2. Map answers to control IDs and call API
  3. Present overall score, principle breakdown, and critical findings

Pricing

  • API access via portal.toolweb.in subscription plans
  • Free trial: 5 API calls/day, 50 API calls/month to test the skill
  • Developer: $39/month — 20 calls/day and 500 calls/month
  • Professional: $99/month — 200 calls/day, 5000 calls/month
  • Enterprise: $299/month — 100K calls/day, 1M calls/month

About

Created by ToolWeb.in — a security-focused MicroSaaS platform with 200+ security APIs, built by a CISSP & CISM certified professional. Trusted by security teams in USA, UK, and Europe and we have platforms for "Pay-per-run", "API Gateway", "MCP Server", "OpenClaw", "RapidAPI" for execution and YouTube channel for demos.

  • 🌐 Toolweb Platform: https://toolweb.in
  • 🔌 API Hub (Kong): https://portal.toolweb.in
  • 🎡 MCP Server: https://hub.toolweb.in
  • 🦞 OpenClaw Skills: https://toolweb.in/openclaw/
  • 🛒 RapidAPI: https://rapidapi.com/user/mkrishna477
  • 📺 YouTube demos: https://youtube.com/@toolweb-009

Related Skills

  • OT Security Posture Scorecard — NIST CSF-based OT/IT convergence scoring
  • K8s Security Posture Scorecard — Kubernetes cluster security assessment
  • IT Risk Assessment Tool — IT infrastructure risk scoring
  • ISO Compliance Gap Analysis — ISO 27001/27701/42001 compliance
  • Threat Assessment & Defense Guide — Threat modeling and defense

Tips

  • OT environments typically score 15-30% on first assessment — this is normal for brownfield plants
  • Focus on "OT Security Focused" principle first — network segmentation and industrial DMZ are foundational
  • The "Business Driven" principle ensures security investment is justified to leadership
  • Even partial assessments are valuable — assess what you know, mark unknowns as non-compliant
  • Run quarterly to track OT security maturity improvement
  • Use findings to justify budget requests for OT security projects
  • Combine with IT Risk Assessment for a complete IT/OT security picture

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

93.52%
按下载量换算1,519

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills