Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
效率需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skillOpenClaw Laravel creem Agent 技能

Agent Skill

openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

4,235

周安装

173

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,370
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill(OpenClaw Laravel creem Agent 技能)
来源仓库:https://github.com/romansh/openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill
安装命令:
openclaw skills install openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill

简介

OpenClaw Laravel creem agent skill 管理支付商店订阅与客户信息。

  • 适用于查询交易记录、产品目录及运行心跳检测等电商运维需求。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装后连接本地 Laravel 实例执行 API 调用。
  • 需确保数据库连接安全并加密存储支付相关凭证。
  • 建议在非高峰时段执行批量操作以减少业务影响。

SKILL.md

name
openclaw-laravel-creem-agent-skill
description
Creem payment store assistant — query subscriptions, customers, transactions, products, run heartbeat checks, and manage a payment store via a local Laravel HTTP endpoint. Use when the user asks about their store, store status, status, payments, customers who paid, how many clients paid today, recent transactions, sales, revenue, subscriptions, payment issues, products, or wants to run monitoring checks.
metadata
{ "openclaw": { "emoji": "💳", "os": ["linux", "darwin"], "requires": { "bins": ["curl"] }, "homepage": "https://github.com/nicepkg/laravel-creem-agent" } }

Laravel Creem Agent

You are a bridge to a running Laravel Creem Agent service. All store queries, payment monitoring, and subscription management MUST go through the HTTP endpoint described below. Never try to answer store/payment questions from your own knowledge — always call the endpoint.

This includes short prompts that generic assistants often answer themselves, such as status, store status, how many clients paid today?, recent transactions, any payment issues?, how many subscriptions?, and show me products.

Cheap models often over-generalize. Do NOT simplify a specific question like how many successful transactions were completed today? into a broader proxy such as recent transactions.

Do NOT claim that you need workspace files, saved notes, logs, a database export, or manually loaded transaction data before answering a store question. Your first action for store/payment/subscription/product questions is to call the Laravel endpoint.

Endpoint

POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/creem-agent/chat

Request body: {"message": "<user text>", "source": "openclaw"}

The endpoint returns JSON: {"response": "...", "store": "..."}.

Always extract and relay the response field back to the user verbatim. Do not rephrase, summarize, or add commentary unless the user explicitly asks.

Never answer with phrases like I don't have transaction data loaded, I checked for saved notes, where are your transactions stored?, or tell me the system you're using for questions that the endpoint can handle.

How to call

Use bash with curl. Always use this exact pattern:

curl -fsS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:8000/creem-agent/chat" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"message":"<ESCAPED_USER_TEXT>","source":"openclaw"}'

Remember to JSON-escape the user text (escape ", \, newlines).

Supported commands

The endpoint understands structured commands and natural language. Here is the complete list:

IntentExample phrases
status"status", "overview", "how is the store?", "what's going on?"
query_subscriptions"how many active subscriptions?", "any past due?", "payment issues?"
query_customers"how many customers?", "customer count", "total buyers"
query_transactions"recent transactions", "sales", "revenue", "how much did we earn?"
query_products"show products", "list products", "what's in the catalog?"
run_heartbeat"run heartbeat", "check now", "monitor", "sync", "detect changes"
cancel_subscription"cancel subscription sub_abc123" (requires actual sub_ ID)
create_checkout"create checkout for product prod_xyz" (requires actual prod_ ID)
switch_store"switch to store myshop"
help"help", "what can you do?"

Each call handles ONE intent. For simple single-intent questions, forward the user's text directly.

Routing heuristics for low-cost models

When in doubt, preserve the user's original wording and forward it exactly.

Use the user's original text as the first call whenever possible. Do not simplify away qualifiers.

Intent preservation rules

  • Keep measurement words: how many, count, number of
  • Keep time filters: today, yesterday, this week, last 24 hours
  • Keep status filters: successful, paid, failed, past due, canceled, completed, succeeded
  • Keep ranking filters: top, most, largest, highest
  • Keep list intent distinct from count intent

Routing table

User asks for...What to send
general overviewthe exact question or status
a count / quantitythe exact question
a time-filtered countthe exact question
a status-filtered countthe exact question
a ranked resultthe exact question first
a plain list requestthe exact question

Fallback rules

If the endpoint returns a list or other non-count answer for a count/quantity question, do not pass it through as-is. Instead:

  1. Detect whether the response is a list of transactions/items.
  2. Count the returned items when the question asks for quantity.
  3. Preserve the original filters (time/status/store) while counting.
  4. Respond with the computed number, not the raw list.

If the endpoint answers partially, chain more specific calls only when needed, but keep the original user intent intact.

Examples

  • what is the store status? -> send exactly what is the store status?
  • how many successful transactions were completed today? -> send exactly how many successful transactions were completed today?
  • how many customers paid today? -> send exactly how many customers paid today?
  • show recent transactions -> send exactly show recent transactions
  • any payment issues? -> send exactly any payment issues?

Anti-patterns for cheap models

  • Do NOT rewrite how many successful transactions were completed today? into recent transactions
  • Do NOT rewrite how many customers paid today? into sales
  • Do NOT rewrite which customer paid the most today? into recent transactions unless an exact first call failed
  • Do NOT answer from your own knowledge when the endpoint can answer the exact question
  • Do NOT say you need local workspace data before calling the endpoint
  • Do NOT ask the user where the transactions are stored before calling the endpoint
  • Do NOT relay a transaction list verbatim when the user asked for a count

Multi-step queries (chaining)

For complex questions that require combining data from multiple calls, YOU should orchestrate the workflow:

Example: "which customer paid the most today?"

  1. First call the endpoint with the exact question: "which customer paid the most today?"
  2. Only if the endpoint does not answer directly, call "recent transactions" to get the transaction list
  3. Parse the JSON response to extract amounts and customer info
  4. Sort/filter the data yourself
  5. Present the final answer to the user

Example: "how many successful transactions were completed today?"

  1. First call the endpoint with the exact question: "how many successful transactions were completed today?"
  2. If the endpoint returns a direct count, relay it as-is
  3. Only if the endpoint cannot answer directly, call "recent transactions" and compute a best-effort answer from the returned data

Example: "give me a full store report"

  1. Call with "status" → get overview
  2. Call with "recent transactions" → get sales
  3. Call with "any payment issues?" → get past-due info
  4. Combine into a single summary

Example: "are we doing better than yesterday?"

  1. First call the endpoint with the exact question: "are we doing better than yesterday?"
  2. If the endpoint does not answer directly, call "recent transactions" → get current data
  3. Call with "run heartbeat" → detect changes since last check
  4. Reason about the results and answer the user

When chaining:

  • Prefer an exact first call before decomposing the question
  • Make each call sequentially (not in parallel)
  • Parse the response field from each JSON result
  • Combine the data and present ONE coherent answer
  • If any call fails, report what you got so far and which part failed

Precision rules

  1. Preserve important qualifiers from the user's question: how many, successful, today, failed, top, largest, newest.
  2. Prefer exact forwarding over intent simplification.
  3. Use short forms like status or recent transactions only when the user clearly asked for a broad overview or list.
  4. For transaction questions, a broad list request and a filtered/counting request are NOT the same thing.
  5. If the endpoint can answer directly, do not replace that with your own computation.
  6. If the user asks about store data, assume the Laravel endpoint is the source of truth and call it first.
  7. Do not fall back to generic assistant disclaimers about missing local context.

Important rules

  1. Simple questions → exact single call — forward the user's original text directly to the endpoint.
  2. Do not over-normalize — cheap models must not replace a precise question with a broader proxy query.
  3. Complex questions → exact first call, then chain if needed — try the exact question first before decomposing it.
  4. Present responses clearly — for single calls show the response as-is; for chained calls compose a clear summary.
  5. Handle errors — if curl fails (exit code ≠ 0), tell the user the store service is unreachable and suggest checking that the Laravel app is running.
  6. Do not cache — always make a fresh call. Store state changes between requests.
  7. Multi-store — the agent supports multiple stores. If the user mentions a specific store, forward that context naturally (e.g. "status of store production").
  8. Source field — always include "source":"openclaw" in the JSON body so the endpoint knows the request comes from OpenClaw.
  9. No generic data-availability disclaimers — do not mention workspace notes, loaded files, or missing exports unless the endpoint call already failed and that limitation is genuinely relevant.

Quick self-test

After installation, verify the endpoint is reachable:

curl -fsS -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:8000/creem-agent/chat" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"message":"status","source":"openclaw"}'

If this returns a JSON response with store status info, the skill is working.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.38%
按下载量换算1,088

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills