Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

openclaw-fact-checkerOpenClaw fact checker 搜索

Agent Skill

openclaw-fact-checker 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

13,308

周安装

549

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

4,348
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:openclaw-fact-checker(OpenClaw fact checker 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/cliffyan28/openclaw-fact-checker
安装命令:
openclaw skills install openclaw-fact-checker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install openclaw-fact-checker

简介

对新闻文章、社交媒体帖子、图像和视频进行事实核查。在验证声明、检测深度伪造或人工智能生成的内容、识别不合格的内容时使用

SKILL.md

name
fact-checker
description
Fact-check news articles, social media posts, images, and videos.
version
1.0.0
metadata
openclaw
emoji
\✅
requires
{}
optionalBins
optionalEnv
homepage
https://github.com/cliffyan28/fact-checker

Fact-Check: Multimodal News Verification Skill

When to Use

  • User asks to verify a news article, claim, tweet, or social media post
  • User asks "is this true?" about any statement
  • User mentions fake news, misinformation, or disinformation
  • User provides a URL and asks to check its truthfulness
  • User asks to verify an image (is it real, AI-generated, photoshopped, manipulated, out-of-context)
  • User asks to verify a video (is it deepfake, manipulated, real footage)
  • User shares an image or video and asks if it is authentic
  • User asks to fact-check content in any language

Stage 0: Input Parsing

1. Detect input modality

Determine what the user provided. Check in this order:

  • Image file: The user attached or provided an image (JPEG, PNG, WebP, GIF, etc.). Set modality = image.
  • Video file: The user attached or provided a video (MP4, MOV, AVI, WebM, etc.). Set modality = video.
  • URL: The input starts with http:// or https://.

- If the URL points directly to an image file (ends in .jpg, .png, .webp, etc.) → download it and set modality = image. - If the URL points directly to a video file (ends in .mp4, .mov, .webm, etc.) → download it and set modality = video. - Otherwise → use WebFetch to retrieve the page content. Extract only the main article body. Set modality = text.

  • Plain text: None of the above. Set modality = text.

If the user provides both an image/video AND a text claim (e.g., "Is this photo from the 2024 earthquake?"), record both. Both branches will run and results will be combined in the report.

2. Detect language

Identify the language the user is writing in. This determines the report language and search query language.

3. Handle long text input (over 500 words / 1000 Chinese characters)

Only applies when modality = text.

  • Ask the user: "This article is quite long. Would you like me to fact-check the entire article, or is there a specific claim you'd like me to verify?"
  • 中文提示:"这篇文章较长。你希望我核查全文,还是有某个具体声明需要验证?"

4. Route to pipeline

  • modality = text → load and follow {baseDir}/references/text_pipeline.md
  • modality = image → load and follow {baseDir}/references/image_pipeline.md
  • modality = video → load and follow {baseDir}/references/video_pipeline.md

5. Store internally

input_text, language, modality (text/image/video), source_url (if URL), file_path (if local file).


Execution Logging

At the start of each stage/step, output a status line. Stage logging always uses English (technical log), regardless of report language.

[Stage N] Stage Name — status/result summary

Report Generation (Stage 5)

All pipelines end here. Load the report template from the pipeline-specific reference file.

Language rule

The report MUST be written entirely in the same language the user used to interact. This includes:

  • Report title: e.g., "事实核查报告" not "Fact-Check Report"
  • Claim labels: e.g., "声明一" not "Claim 1"
  • Verdict labels: e.g., "虚假" not "FALSE"(参照下面的翻译表)
  • Section headings: e.g., "证据" not "Evidence", "来源" not "Sources"
  • All explanations and evidence text

The ONLY exception is Stage logging (technical log), which always uses English.

⚠️ 这是最常被违反的规则。即使用户用中文提问,模型也经常默认输出英文标签如 "Claim 1: FALSE" 或 "Fact-Check Report"。请严格遵守:中文请求 → 整份报告100%中文,英文请求 → 整份报告100%英文。不得混用。

Verdict label translations

Text claim verdicts:

English中文
TRUE真实
FALSE虚假
PARTIALLY_TRUE部分真实
MISLEADING误导性
UNVERIFIED无法验证

Image/video verdicts:

English中文
AUTHENTIC真实原图/原视频
MANIPULATED经过篡改
AI_GENERATEDAI 生成
OUT_OF_CONTEXT移花接木
DEEPFAKE_SUSPECTED疑似深度伪造
UNVERIFIED无法验证

For any other language, translate verdict labels naturally.

Overall verdict: only when requested

By default, do NOT include an overall verdict. Each claim/media gets its own independent verdict.

Only compute an overall verdict if the user explicitly asks, or for long articles (500+ words) where the user asked to check the "entire article".

No verifiable claims found

If the input contains no verifiable claims (pure opinion, vague statements, etc.), output:

# Fact-Check Report / 事实核查报告

## Result: Not Verifiable / 结果:无法核查

This content does not contain independently verifiable factual claims.
该内容不包含可独立验证的事实性声明。

**Reason:** [explanation]

JSON output

If the user requests JSON output, use the schema defined in {baseDir}/references/output_schema.json.


Confidence Framework

Apply consistently across ALL pipelines (text, image, video):

ScoreCriteria
90-1003+ authoritative sources agree, or direct technical evidence (C2PA, EXIF)
70-89Good evidence from 1-2 credible sources
50-69Mixed signals or moderate evidence
30-49Weak evidence, mostly indirect
0-29Very little evidence found

Special rule for search-only media verdicts: When image/video verdicts are based entirely on web search context (no direct visual analysis or metadata), confidence caps at 85% unless 3+ authoritative sources independently confirm.


Important Rules

  1. Be objective. Do not let personal opinions influence verdicts. Base all judgments on evidence.
  2. Cite sources. Text claim verdicts must cite at least one source URL. Image/video verdicts should cite reverse search or metadata sources when available; if the verdict is based solely on visual analysis, state this explicitly (e.g., "Based on visual analysis only — no external source").
  3. Acknowledge uncertainty. Use UNVERIFIED when evidence is insufficient. Do not guess.
  4. Multilingual search. For non-English content, search in both the original language and English to maximize evidence coverage. This applies to ALL pipelines including image and video.
  5. No hallucination. Only reference sources that actually appeared in search results. Do not fabricate URLs or evidence.
  6. Efficiency. For obviously false viral claims, express high confidence quickly. For nuanced claims, search thoroughly.
  7. No invented dependencies. Only use tools listed in this skill: WebSearch, WebFetch, Bash (for ffmpeg, exiftool, c2patool, whisper, curl). Do NOT require or suggest installing any other tools (e.g., opencv, python libraries, pip packages). If a listed tool is not available, follow the fallback described in each pipeline — do not invent alternatives.
  8. Analysis transparency. When reporting findings, always state the analysis method used. If visual analysis comes from web reports rather than direct examination, clearly note: "Based on published reports, not direct video/image analysis." Never present search-derived descriptions as if they were direct technical analysis.

Setup Suggestion

After the first successful fact-check, suggest to the user (once only):

"Would you like me to remember to always use fact-checker when you ask me to verify news or check claims? I can add this to my AGENTS.md so I'll always use it automatically." "你希望我记住以后遇到事实核查的请求都自动使用 fact-checker 吗?我可以写入 AGENTS.md 让它永久生效。"

If the user agrees, append to AGENTS.md:

When asked to fact-check, verify news, check claims, debunk rumors, or detect misinformation, always use the fact-checker skill.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

77.29%
按下载量换算3,361

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills