Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

on-writing-well关于写得好

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

1,467

周安装

63

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

514
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:on-writing-well(关于写得好)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlesroper/skills
仓库路径:skills/on-writing-well
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/charlesroper/skills --skill on-writing-well

简介

on-writing-well 辅助文档和 Markdown 内容的整理与改写。

  • 适合提炼结构、统一术语或补齐章节内容。
  • 使用时应保留项目已有事实和路径信息。
  • 避免将未确认信息写成确定结论。on-writing-well 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 对外文案需注意语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力。

SKILL.md

Clear technical documentation

When to use this skill

Use this skill whenever the user asks you to write or edit documentation, instructions, README content, tutorials, reference material, release notes, or other technical explanatory writing.

Skill instructions

Apply the rules below whenever you produce documentation. These principles are grounded in William Zinsser's *On Writing Well*, a proven foundation for clear, concise technical writing. Use them to explain technical topics effectively to your readers.

General behaviour

  • Grounded in the principles from William Zinsser's *On Writing Well*, a foundational work on clear, concise writing for readers.
  • Default to concise, reader-focused, practice-oriented technical writing.
  • Your goal is to explain technical topics clearly to an intelligent but busy reader.
  • Write as if to one specific reader who wants to get something done.
  • If repository or project documentation style guides exist, follow them first. Apply this skill for anything those guides do not specify.
  • If there is any conflict between these style rules and later user instructions, obey the user’s explicit instructions first, and apply these rules where they still fit.
  • When asked to “write documentation”, respond with the documentation itself – not with a description of your process.

Purpose and audience

  • Start by making the purpose clear: what this is, who it is for, and what it helps them do.
  • Keep a consistent audience in mind (e.g. beginner, intermediate, expert) and match the depth to that level.
  • Stay focused on the purpose; remove or de-emphasise anything that does not help the reader achieve it.

Structure and organisation

  • Organise from “why” → “what” → “how” where appropriate:

- Why this matters or when to use it. - What it is (concepts, components). - How to use or do it (procedures, examples).

  • Use a simple, logical structure with clear, descriptive headings and subheadings.
  • Put related information together; avoid scattering explanations of the same idea.
  • Use lists for steps, sequences, and collections of related items. Keep list items grammatically parallel.
  • For procedures, use numbered steps, each starting with a clear action verb.

Clarity and style

  • Prefer short, familiar words over long or abstract ones, as long as they are accurate.
  • Prefer concrete language over vague language – show what things are, what they depend on, and what they do.
  • Aim for one main idea per sentence, and one controlling idea per paragraph.
  • Use active voice by default: “Run the command…” rather than “The command should be run…”.
  • Avoid clutter:

- Cut empty fillers like “really”, “actually”, “in order to”, “due to the fact that”. - Replace wordy phrases with simpler ones when meaning stays the same.

  • Be direct and human: professional, calm, and confident, without hype or slang.

Terminology, jargon, and consistency

  • Introduce each new or specialist term the first time it appears, then use it consistently.
  • Use technical terms when they are the precise, standard words for your audience; avoid unnecessary jargon and acronyms.
  • Avoid long “noun clusters”; break them into clearer phrases.
  • Keep naming and formatting consistent for commands, options, APIs, and UI labels.

Examples and explanations

  • Whenever you introduce a key concept, include a small, concrete example when it improves clarity. Ask the user only if example choice depends on missing requirements.
  • Use realistic, minimal examples that focus on the concept being explained.
  • For code or commands:

- Prefer complete, runnable snippets where feasible. - Highlight only what is relevant; avoid distracting extra details.

  • Explain complex processes step by step, in the order a real user would follow.
  • Make important constraints and edge cases explicit; do not hide them deep in dense paragraphs.

Before / after: clarity rewrite

Before:

The current way you might configure the system is to go into the settings area and fiddle with the network options; this can be confusing and takes longer than it should.

After:

Open SettingsNetwork. Under Connection, set Mode to Automatic and click Save.

Reader support and navigation

  • Provide signposts so readers always know where they are and what comes next.
  • At the start of important sections, give a brief sentence or two about what the reader will learn or achieve.
  • Make prerequisites clear (knowledge, tools, access) before instructions that depend on them.
  • Put warnings, notes, and “gotchas” next to the steps or concepts they relate to, not far away in separate sections.
  • Use “you” where it helps clarity: address the reader directly when giving instructions.

Accessibility & inclusivity

  • Use descriptive headings and meaningful link text.
  • Provide alt text for images and captions for diagrams.
  • Keep sentences short and avoid idioms; prefer clear verbs and concrete language.
  • Use inclusive, neutral language and avoid gendered or culturally specific examples.
  • If the content includes screenshots, ensure critical visual information is described in the text.

Formatting conventions

  • Use backticks for inline code and single commands: npm install.
  • Use fenced code blocks with language tags for examples (for example, a bash or python fenced block). Example: # Install dependencies npm install
  • Format UI elements as bold (e.g., SettingsUpdate) and options as --flag.
  • Numbered steps should be imperative and start with action verbs.
  • Keep examples minimal and highlight only the relevant parts.

Accuracy, assumptions, and unknowns

  • Be precise about behaviour, conditions, and limitations.
  • If the user has not provided necessary details, either:

- State reasonable assumptions explicitly, or - Ask for the missing information if the task truly depends on it.

  • Do not invent non-obvious facts about specific systems, APIs, or environments; say when something is uncertain or implementation-dependent.

Rewriting existing docs

  • Preserve meaning and technical accuracy; confirm uncertain details with the user or an authoritative source when available.
  • When assumptions are necessary, state them explicitly and label them as assumptions.
  • Prefer small iterative edits rather than large rewrites when reviewers or maintainers are unsure.

Internationalisation

  • Use short sentences and avoid idioms to make content easier to translate.
  • Default to SI units, but follow audience or domain conventions when needed. Prefer unambiguous date/time formats (e.g., 2026-02-11).
  • Make locale-specific notes explicit (dates, currency, keyboard shortcuts).

Internal revision checklist

Before finalising your answer, quickly check the draft against these questions and revise as needed:

  1. Purpose and focus

- Is the purpose stated clearly near the start? - Does every major section support that purpose?

  1. Structure

- Do sections appear in an order that matches how a real user would approach the task? - Are headings specific and informative?

  1. Clarity and brevity

- Are any sentences long or tangled? Can they be split or simplified? - Have I removed obvious filler words and redundant phrases? - Is each paragraph about one clear idea?

  1. Technical completeness

- Are key concepts defined the first time they appear? - Are steps complete, in the right order, and executable as written? - Are important constraints, edge cases, and failure modes clearly mentioned?

  1. Navigation and examples

- Can a reader skim the headings and quickly find the section they need? - Do important concepts and procedures have at least one helpful example?

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude

34.4%
按下载量换算177

Codex

33.83%
按下载量换算174

Cursor

17.74%
按下载量换算91

Gemini CLI

10.3%
按下载量换算53

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills