Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

prioritizing-roadmap优先路线图

Agent Skill

prioritizing-roadmap 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

753

周安装

32

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

264
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:prioritizing-roadmap(优先路线图)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/prioritizing-roadmap
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill prioritizing-roadmap

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词和任务场景定位。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude 等宿主中快速获取候选结果。
  • 可结合来源仓库 README 核验具体用法和权限范围。
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • prioritizing-roadmap 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Prioritizing Roadmap

Scope

Covers

  • Turning messy roadmap inputs into a ranked opportunity list + coherent roadmap
  • Defining a planning “season” (macro context) and success criteria
  • Using a common-currency scoring model (ICE + assumptions) to compare across teams
  • Producing an alignment-ready Roadmap Prioritization Pack

When to use

  • “What should we build next?”
  • “We need a Q2/Q3 roadmap.”
  • “We have too many requests and no way to compare them.”
  • “We need to prioritize across multiple teams/pods.”

When NOT to use

  • You don’t have any agreed goal / North Star / strategic intent (do product vision / goals first)
  • You need sprint planning or story-level estimation
  • You’re only choosing a single experiment within an already-fixed roadmap
  • You need a full customer discovery plan from scratch

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product + primary customer segment
  • Planning horizon + cadence (e.g., next 6 weeks, next quarter, rolling 12–24 months)
  • Success criteria (North Star / business goal) + 2–5 guardrails
  • Candidate opportunities (or current roadmap/backlog) with rough size/effort
  • Constraints: capacity, commitments, dependencies, deadlines, risk tolerance

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If still missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 roadmap options.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Roadmap Prioritization Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (goal, horizon, constraints, stakeholders)
  2. Season framing (what changed, key bets, explicit non-goals)
  3. Opportunity inventory with conviction level (known vs hypothesis) and evidence
  4. Prioritization model (common currency + ICE scoring + assumptions)
  5. Ranked opportunity list (top 10–20) + “parking lot”
  6. Roadmap draft (Now/Next/Later or quarterly themes) + update cadence (rolling plan)
  7. Decision narrative (why these, why now) + “Think Bigger” ideas
  8. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + decision framing

  • Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm the decision (backlog vs quarterly roadmap vs annual planning), horizon, stakeholders, constraints, and “must-do” commitments.
  • Outputs: Context snapshot.
  • Checks: Everyone agrees what decision will be made and by when.

2) Define the “season” + success criteria

  • Inputs: Context snapshot.
  • Actions: Name the current season (macro context), define 3–5 season bets, and set success criteria (North Star + guardrails).
  • Outputs: Season framing section.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can restate “why now” and “what we’re optimizing for”.

3) Build the opportunity inventory (separate truth vs hypotheses)

  • Inputs: Candidate inputs (requests, ideas, problems).
  • Actions: Normalize each item into a problem/outcome statement; tag conviction level (Known / Belief / Hypothesis) and evidence; split discovery vs delivery.
  • Outputs: Opportunity inventory table.
  • Checks: Every item has an intended outcome metric and a confidence/evidence note.

4) Define the common-currency scoring model (ICE + assumptions)

  • Inputs: Inventory + success criteria.
  • Actions: Choose a primary “common currency” (e.g., North Star units, revenue, cost, risk reduction) and define ICE scales; estimate impact ranges and confidence based on evidence.
  • Outputs: Scoring model + filled scoring table.
  • Checks: Two people using the same scales would produce similar relative rankings.

5) Stress-test the ranking (scenarios + constraints)

  • Inputs: Scored list + constraints.
  • Actions: Apply constraints (capacity, dependencies, deadlines); run 2–3 scenarios (base / aggressive / conservative); ensure a balanced portfolio (core, growth, quality, big bets).
  • Outputs: Shortlist (top set) + parking lot + key tradeoffs.
  • Checks: Tradeoffs and “no’s” are explicit; nothing critical is missing.

6) Draft the roadmap (sequencing + cadence)

  • Inputs: Shortlist + scenario choice.
  • Actions: Convert priorities into a roadmap (Now/Next/Later or quarterly themes), sequencing by dependencies and learning; define a rolling plan cadence (e.g., rolling 12–24 months, refreshed every 6 months).
  • Outputs: Roadmap draft + update cadence.
  • Checks: The roadmap is coherent, feasible, and resilient to new inputs.

7) Write the decision narrative + alignment plan

  • Inputs: Roadmap draft + rationale.
  • Actions: Write “why these, why now”; include a “Think Bigger” section; define how the roadmap will be communicated and updated.
  • Outputs: Decision narrative + comms/rollout plan.
  • Checks: A cross-functional partner can explain the roadmap without you in the room.

8) Quality gate + finalize the pack

  • Inputs: Full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final Roadmap Prioritization Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is shareable as-is; assumptions, owners, and cadence are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “Prioritize our next-quarter roadmap for a collaboration product across Growth + Core.” Expected: season framing, scored opportunity inventory, a Now/Next/Later roadmap, and a clear decision narrative with explicit non-goals.

Example 2 (Marketplace): “Prioritize 6 months of roadmap across supply, demand, and trust & safety.” Expected: a common-currency model that makes cross-team tradeoffs comparable and a rolling plan refreshed on a fixed cadence.

Boundary example: “Give me a 2-year roadmap, we don’t have goals or constraints.” Response: ask for goals/constraints; if unavailable, produce options + assumptions and recommend doing product vision + North Star first.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.3%
按下载量换算101

Claude

28.9%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

20.89%
按下载量换算55

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills