Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

positioning-messaging定位消息

Agent Skill

positioning-messaging 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

857

周安装

35

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

274
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:positioning-messaging(定位消息)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/positioning-messaging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill positioning-messaging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill positioning-messaging

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。

  • 适合围绕代码变更和仓库状态进行整理与分析。
  • 可结合来源仓库 README 核验具体用法和权限范围。
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • positioning-messaging 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Positioning & Messaging

Scope

Covers

  • Positioning (category, ICP, differentiation, “against what alternative”)
  • Messaging hierarchy (core message + pillars + proof)
  • Value proposition + copy primitives (one-liner, tagline, headline/subhead, elevator pitch)
  • Channel adaptation (website, sales, press pattern-matching)
  • Lightweight message validation plan

When to use

  • “We need clearer positioning and messaging.”
  • “Rewrite our value prop / one-liner / tagline / homepage hero.”
  • “People don’t ‘get it’—pipeline is sluggish and sales keeps re-explaining.”
  • “Create a messaging hierarchy and proof points for.”
  • “Give me 5 headline/tagline options that fit our positioning.”

When NOT to use

  • You need to decide *what to build* (use a problem definition / strategy workflow first)
  • You need a full brand identity system (visual identity guidelines, logo, UI kit)
  • You need only copyediting/tone-polish of existing copy with no positioning change
  • You don’t have (or refuse to assume) an ICP/use case and “alternative” to position against

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product: what it is + what it does (1–3 sentences)
  • Target audience (ICP/persona) and primary use case / job-to-be-done
  • Primary alternative(s): status quo, competitor, internal build, agency, manual workaround
  • Differentiators + proof (features, results, customer quotes, credibility signals)
  • Primary surface(s): website hero, sales pitch, deck, ads, press, app onboarding
  • Constraints: tone/voice, compliance/claims, taboo words, time box

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If answers aren’t available, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns. Provide 2–3 alternate positioning directions if uncertainty is high.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Positioning & Messaging Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (decision, ICP, use case, surfaces, constraints)
  2. Positioning brief (category + “against” alternative + differentiation + proof + tradeoffs)
  3. Messaging hierarchy (core message + 3 pillars + proof points + objections)
  4. Copy set (one-liner, elevator pitch, tagline options, homepage hero headline/subhead, CTA suggestions)
  5. Consistency enablement (“say this / not that”, internal script, sales talk track)
  6. Validation plan (how to test for understanding + recall; next iteration loop)
  7. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + success definition

  • Inputs: User context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Clarify ICP, use case, primary surface(s), and what “better” means (pipeline response, conversion, comprehension, recall).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot.
  • Checks: A stakeholder can answer: “Who is this for, and what will this messaging change?”

2) Choose the “against” alternative + category frame

  • Inputs: Known competitors/status quo; market context.
  • Actions: Identify the real alternative in the decision (status quo/workaround/competitor). Choose a category frame and a simple pattern match (“ for ”).
  • Outputs: “Against” alternative + category statement options.
  • Checks: The category is understandable without a glossary; the “against” alternative is explicit.

3) Write the positioning brief (specific, with tradeoffs)

  • Inputs: Differentiators + proof.
  • Actions: Draft a positioning statement and supporting brief: value, differentiation, proof, and what you *don’t* do (tradeoffs/non-goals).
  • Outputs: Positioning brief.
  • Checks: The positioning could not plausibly fit 3 different competitors; proof is concrete or labeled “to validate”.

4) Build a messaging hierarchy (listener-first)

  • Inputs: Positioning brief; audience pains/goals; objections.
  • Actions: Create: core message → 3 pillars → proof points. Add “what we mean / what we don’t mean” to prevent confusion.
  • Outputs: Messaging hierarchy + proof bank.
  • Checks: A first-time reader can restate the value in one sentence; message is memorable (see checklist).

5) Generate copy primitives (tight + pattern-matched)

  • Inputs: Messaging hierarchy; target surfaces.
  • Actions: Draft one-liner, elevator pitch, tagline options, and hero headline/subhead. Keep it direct; use pattern matching when helpful (especially for press).
  • Outputs: Copy set (v1).
  • Checks: Copy is concrete (specific nouns/verbs), avoids vague superlatives, and matches the category frame.

6) Create consistency + enablement assets

  • Inputs: Copy set; internal stakeholders; sales/support needs.
  • Actions: Produce “say this / not that”, internal description script, and a short sales talk track + “reset” explanation for confused prospects.
  • Outputs: Consistency enablement section.
  • Checks: Two different team members would describe the product the same way.

7) Draft a validation plan (understanding + recall)

  • Inputs: Channels + time box; access to customers/prospects.
  • Actions: Propose a lightweight test plan: comprehension (“what is it?”), relevance (“is this for you?”), and recall (“what do you remember tomorrow?”). Include 5–8 test questions and a decision rule.
  • Outputs: Validation plan + iteration loop.
  • Checks: Plan is feasible given constraints; includes a clear “revise/keep” rule.

8) Quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: Draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final Positioning & Messaging Pack.
  • Checks: The pack is usable as-is by marketing + sales + founders; assumptions are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “We’re an AI QA tool for customer support teams. Create positioning + messaging and 5 homepage hero options.” Expected: positioning brief (against ‘manual QA + spreadsheets’), messaging pillars with proof, one-liner/taglines, hero headline/subhead set, and validation questions.

Example 2 (Marketplace): “We’re moving upmarket. Reposition for IT managers and draft an elevator pitch + sales talk track.” Expected: revised category frame and “against” alternative, updated messaging hierarchy for the new buyer, pitch + talk track, and a short enablement section.

Boundary example: “Write me a logo and brand identity.” Response: decline visual identity work; offer to produce positioning/messaging and a brief for a brand designer.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

31.88%
按下载量换算87

Claude

30.04%
按下载量换算82

Cursor

19.01%
按下载量换算52

Gemini CLI

10.16%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills