Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

delegating-work委派工作

Agent Skill

delegating-work 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

612

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

214
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:delegating-work(委派工作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/delegating-work
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill delegating-work
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill delegating-work

简介

delegating-work 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Delegating Work

Scope

Covers

  • Delegating a specific project/problem/decision to a direct report (or cross-functional owner)
  • Transferring context without control (clear outcomes + guardrails, not step-by-step instructions)
  • Setting decision rights, check-in cadence, and “in-the-details” quality reviews without micromanaging

When to use

  • “Help me delegate this project/task to someone on my team.”
  • “I’m holding onto too much / I need to give away my Lego.”
  • “I’m worried I’m micromanaging—how do I stay in the details but empower ownership?”
  • “Draft a delegation brief + decision rights + check-in plan.”

When NOT to use

  • The work is primarily a performance problem (use coaching/feedback workflows instead)
  • You need to decide *what* work to do (prioritization/scope first)
  • You lack a clear outcome, constraints, or success criteria (do a quick problem-definition first)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • The work item to delegate (project/problem/decision) + why now
  • Desired outcome (definition of done) + success metrics or acceptance criteria
  • Constraints/non-negotiables (timeline, budget, quality bar, policies, stakeholders)
  • Delegatee context (role, current load, experience level, growth goals if relevant)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If details are unavailable, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Delegation Pack (Markdown in-chat, or files if requested) in this order:

  1. Delegation brief (outcome, context, constraints, stakeholders, timeline)
  2. Decision rights + guardrails (what they can decide, escalation triggers, review points)
  3. Context handoff pack (links, background, “known gotchas”, example outputs)
  4. Execution cadence (check-ins, update format, what “good” looks like)
  5. Review plan (how to be in the details without telling them how to do it)
  6. Debrief plan (learning capture + ownership updates)
  7. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Frame the delegation decision

  • Inputs: Work item + why now; constraints.
  • Actions: Define the outcome, the “why” (business context), and what must not change (non-negotiables). Decide what “good” looks like.
  • Outputs: Draft Delegation Brief (top section).
  • Checks: The outcome is measurable/testable (someone can say “done” unambiguously).

2) Pick the owner + choose the autonomy level

  • Inputs: Candidate owner(s); their experience and growth goals.
  • Actions: Select the delegatee. Set an explicit autonomy level (e.g., “propose + I approve” vs “you decide, inform me”). Call out which parts are “on assignment” vs “high flexibility.”
  • Outputs: Owner + autonomy statement + boundaries.
  • Checks: Both of you can repeat: “What decisions are yours vs mine?”

3) Transfer context (not instructions)

  • Inputs: Background docs; prior decisions; stakeholders; constraints.
  • Actions: Provide full context so the owner can connect the dots. Share the “why”, the tradeoffs, and known pitfalls. Avoid prescribing the exact path.
  • Outputs: Context Handoff Pack.
  • Checks: Owner can explain the problem, constraints, and success criteria in their own words.

4) Define decision rights + guardrails

  • Inputs: Non-negotiables; risks; stakeholders.
  • Actions: Write decision rights, escalation triggers, and review points. Set “red lines” (quality, policy, safety, customer impact).
  • Outputs: Decision Rights + Guardrails.
  • Checks: Escalation triggers are specific (not “if it feels risky”).

5) Align on plan + milestones (owner-led)

  • Inputs: Draft Delegation Brief + guardrails.
  • Actions: Ask the owner to propose a plan, milestones, and tradeoffs. Act as a thought partner: ask questions instead of giving the answer.
  • Outputs: Milestone plan + first-week plan.
  • Checks: Plan has milestones tied to outcomes, not just activities.

6) Set the execution cadence

  • Inputs: Timeline; team routines; stakeholder needs.
  • Actions: Set check-in frequency, update format, and what you want to see (risks, decisions, asks). Establish how you’ll “refuse to rule” unless a trigger is hit.
  • Outputs: Cadence + Update Template.
  • Checks: Check-ins focus on outcomes/risks/decisions, not task-by-task status.

7) Review in the details without micromanaging

  • Inputs: Work artifacts; review points.
  • Actions: Review output quality via artifacts (docs, specs, results) and criteria. When the team is struggling with the *right* problems, step back. When it’s the wrong problem, intervene with clarity on outcome/guardrails.
  • Outputs: Review notes + decisions (approve/adjust/escalate).
  • Checks: Feedback is framed as “quality bar + constraints” (not “do it my way”).

8) Close the loop (debrief + “give away the Lego”)

  • Inputs: Final deliverable; what happened; learnings.
  • Actions: Debrief what worked/what didn’t, update ownership maps, and explicitly acknowledge the new owner. Capture improvements to templates/guardrails.
  • Outputs: Debrief notes + next delegation candidates.
  • Checks: Ownership is durable (not “it snaps back to you” after delivery).

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1: “Delegate discovery + recommendation for improving onboarding activation to my PM.” Expected: delegation brief, decision rights (what PM decides vs escalates), context pack (data + constraints), weekly cadence, review plan for the final recommendation doc.

Example 2: “Delegate building a lightweight internal tool to an engineer, but I’m worried about security/compliance.” Expected: guardrails + escalation triggers, clear non-negotiables, review points for design + launch readiness, and a debrief plan.

Boundary example: “Delegate ‘make the company strategy better.’” Response: require a narrower outcome (decision to support, artifacts, time box) before producing the Delegation Pack.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude

32.15%
按下载量换算69

Codex

31.54%
按下载量换算67

Cursor

19.39%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

10.07%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills