Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

okr-kpi-patternsOKR KPI 模式

Agent Skill

okr-kpi-patterns 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

210

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

160

下载量

73
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:okr-kpi-patterns(OKR KPI 模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit
仓库路径:skills/okr-kpi-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill okr-kpi-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill okr-kpi-patterns

简介

okr-kpi-patterns 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

OKR & KPI Patterns

Frameworks for defining goals, measuring success, and building metrics-driven organizations.

OKR Framework

Objectives and Key Results align teams around ambitious goals with measurable outcomes.

OKR Structure

Objective: Qualitative, inspiring goal
├── Key Result 1: Quantitative measure of progress
├── Key Result 2: Quantitative measure of progress
└── Key Result 3: Quantitative measure of progress

Writing Good Objectives

CharacteristicGoodBad
Qualitative"Delight enterprise customers""Increase NPS to 50"
Inspiring"Become the go-to platform""Ship 10 features"
Time-boundImplied quarterlyVague timeline
AmbitiousStretch goal (70% achievable)Sandbagged (100% easy)

Writing Good Key Results

CharacteristicGoodBad
Quantitative"Reduce churn from 8% to 4%""Improve retention"
Measurable"Ship to 10,000 beta users""Launch beta"
Outcome-focused"Increase conversion by 20%""Add 5 features"
Leading indicators"Weekly active users reach 50K""Revenue hits $1M" (lagging)

OKR Example

## Q1  OKRs

### Objective 1: Become the #1 choice for enterprise teams

**Key Results:**
- KR1: Increase enterprise NPS from 32 to 50
- KR2: Reduce time-to-value from 14 days to 3 days
- KR3: Achieve 95% feature adoption in first 30 days
- KR4: Win 5 competitive displacements from [Competitor]

### Objective 2: Build a world-class engineering culture

**Key Results:**
- KR1: Reduce deploy-to-production time from 4 hours to 15 minutes
- KR2: Achieve 90% code coverage on critical paths
- KR3: Zero P0 incidents lasting longer than 30 minutes
- KR4: Engineering satisfaction score reaches 4.5/5

Leading vs. Lagging Indicators

Understanding the difference is crucial for effective measurement.

Definitions

TypeDefinitionCharacteristics
LeadingPredictive, can be directly influencedReal-time feedback, actionable
LaggingResults of past actionsConfirms outcomes, hard to change

Examples by Domain

Sales Pipeline:
  Leading: # of qualified meetings this week
  Lagging: Quarterly revenue

Customer Success:
  Leading: Product usage frequency
  Lagging: Customer churn rate

Engineering:
  Leading: Code review turnaround time
  Lagging: Production incidents

Marketing:
  Leading: Website traffic, MQLs
  Lagging: Customer acquisition cost (CAC)

The Leading-Lagging Chain

Leading                                           Lagging
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────►

Blog posts    Website     MQLs      SQLs      Deals     Revenue
published  →  traffic  →  generated → created → closed → booked
   │            │           │          │         │         │
   ▼            ▼           ▼          ▼         ▼         ▼
 Actionable  Actionable   Somewhat   Less      Hard      Result
             (SEO, ads)   (content)  control   control

Using Both Effectively

## Balanced Metrics Dashboard

### Leading Indicators (Weekly Review)
| Metric | Current | Target | Status |
|--------|---------|--------|--------|
| Active users (DAU) | 12,500 | 15,000 | 🟡 |
| Feature adoption rate | 68% | 75% | 🟡 |
| Support ticket volume | 142 | <100 | 🔴 |
| NPS responses collected | 89 | 100 | 🟢 |

### Lagging Indicators (Monthly Review)
| Metric | Current | Target | Status |
|--------|---------|--------|--------|
| Monthly revenue | $485K | $500K | 🟡 |
| Customer churn | 5.2% | <5% | 🟡 |
| NPS score | 42 | 50 | 🟢 |
| CAC payback months | 14 | 12 | 🔴 |

KPI Trees

Hierarchical breakdown of metrics showing cause-effect relationships.

Revenue KPI Tree

                         Revenue
                            │
          ┌─────────────────┼─────────────────┐
          │                 │                 │
     New Revenue      Expansion         Retained
          │            Revenue           Revenue
          │                │                 │
    ┌─────┴─────┐    ┌─────┴─────┐    ┌─────┴─────┐
    │           │    │           │    │           │
  Leads ×    Conv  Users ×   Upsell  Existing × (1-Churn)
  Rate       Rate   ARPU      Rate    Revenue     Rate

Product Health KPI Tree

                    Product Health Score
                            │
         ┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐
         │                  │                  │
    Engagement          Retention         Satisfaction
         │                  │                  │
    ┌────┴────┐       ┌────┴────┐       ┌────┴────┐
    │         │       │         │       │         │
   DAU/     Time    Day 1    Day 30    NPS    Support
   MAU      in App  Retention Retention       Tickets

North Star Metric

One metric that captures core value delivery.

Examples by Business Type

Business TypeNorth Star MetricWhy
SaaSWeekly Active UsersIndicates ongoing value
MarketplaceGross Merchandise ValueCaptures both sides
MediaTime spent readingEngagement = value
E-commercePurchase frequencyRepeat = satisfied
FintechAssets under managementTrust + usage

North Star + Input Metrics

## Our North Star Framework

**North Star:** Weekly Active Teams (WAT)

**Input Metrics:**
1. New team signups (acquisition)
2. Teams completing onboarding (activation)
3. Features used per team per week (engagement)
4. Teams inviting new members (virality)
5. Teams on paid plans (monetization)

**Lagging Validation:**
- Revenue growth
- Net retention rate
- Customer lifetime value

Metric Definition Template

## Metric: [Name]

### Definition
[Precise definition of what this metric measures]

### Formula

Metric = Numerator / Denominator

### Data Source
- System: [Where data comes from]
- Table/Event: [Specific location]
- Owner: [Team responsible]

### Segments
- By customer tier (Free, Pro, Enterprise)
- By geography (NA, EMEA, APAC)
- By cohort (signup month)

### Frequency
- Calculation: Daily
- Review: Weekly

### Targets
| Period | Target | Stretch |
|--------|--------|---------|
| Q1 | 10,000 | 12,000 |
| Q2 | 15,000 | 18,000 |

### Related Metrics
- Leading: [Metric that predicts this]
- Lagging: [Metric this predicts]

Common Pitfalls

PitfallMitigation
Vanity metricsFocus on metrics that drive decisions
Too many KPIsLimit to 5-7 per team
Gaming metricsPair metrics that balance each other
Lagging onlyInclude leading indicators for early signals
No baselinesEstablish current state before setting targets
Static goalsReview and adjust quarterly

Best Practices

  • OKRs for goals, KPIs for health: Use together, not interchangeably
  • Leading indicator focus: Key Results should be leading indicators
  • Cascade with autonomy: Align outcomes, let teams choose their path
  • Regular calibration: Weekly check-ins on leading, monthly on lagging
  • AI-assisted insights: Use AI to detect anomalies and suggest actions

Related Skills

  • product-strategy-frameworks - Strategic context for metrics
  • business-case-analysis - Financial metrics and ROI
  • prioritization-frameworks - Using metrics to prioritize

References

Version: 1.0.0 (January)

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.26%
按下载量换算26

Claude

30.26%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

20.42%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

8.39%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills