Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

regulatory-compliance监管合规性

Agent Skill

regulatory-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

724

周安装

29

GitHub Stars

25

下载量

234
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:regulatory-compliance(监管合规性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio
仓库路径:skills/regulatory-compliance
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-compliance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oimiragieo/agent-studio --skill regulatory-compliance

简介

regulatory-compliance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于合规性检查、法规研究与政策匹配等场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Regulatory Compliance Skill

Overview

Assess systems, processes, and artifacts against major regulatory frameworks:

  • GDPR/CCPA — Data privacy compliance for EU and California/US state laws
  • Privacy-by-Design — Proactive privacy embedding following Ann Cavoukian's 7 principles
  • ADA/WCAG — Web and software accessibility under ADA and WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA standards
  • DPA Validation — Data Processing Agreement completeness and correctness checks
  • Regulatory Monitoring — Guidance on tracking regulatory changes across jurisdictions

Output is structured as PASS / CONDITIONAL / FAIL with severity-rated findings and actionable remediation tasks.

When to Use

  • Before deploying any feature that collects, processes, or stores personal data
  • During architecture review for systems touching PII or user data
  • When validating third-party vendor agreements and DPAs
  • Before launching products in EU, California, or any jurisdiction with active privacy law
  • When auditing accessibility compliance for public-facing interfaces
  • As part of CI compliance gates for data pipelines and APIs

Iron Laws

  1. NEVER report PASS on partial compliance — if any item fails, the result is CONDITIONAL or FAIL; partial compliance masks violations.
  2. ALWAYS include remediation tasks with specific owning agents — vague findings don't produce fixes; every FAIL/CONDITIONAL must specify who fixes it and how.
  3. NEVER skip multi-jurisdiction check — GDPR, CCPA, and 20+ US state laws may all apply; document scope clearly.
  4. ALWAYS verify privacy-by-design at design time — retrofitting privacy after deployment is significantly more costly and less effective.
  5. NEVER treat accessibility as optional — ADA/WCAG compliance carries active litigation risk (ADA lawsuits up 37% H1 2025); all public interfaces must be validated.
  6. ALWAYS document regulation version and date assessed — regulatory guidance evolves; stamp every report with the regulation version and assessment date.

Workflow

Step 1: Scope Definition

Define which regulations apply to the subject of the assessment:

## Compliance Scope

- Subject: [System / Feature / DPA / Interface being assessed]
- Jurisdictions: [EU / California / Virginia / Colorado / Other states]
- Applicable Regulations:
  - [ ] GDPR (EU General Data Protection Regulation)
  - [ ] CCPA/CPRA (California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act)
  - [ ] US State Laws (VCDPA, CPA, CTDPA, etc.)
  - [ ] ADA / Section 508 (US accessibility)
  - [ ] WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines)
  - [ ] DPA Review (vendor data processing agreement)
- Personal Data Categories Involved: [list data types]
- Assessment Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
- Regulation Versions Referenced: [e.g., GDPR as amended 2024, CPRA effective 2023]

Step 2: GDPR/CCPA Compliance Checklist

Execute checklist items relevant to the assessed subject:

Data Inventory & Mapping

  • All personal data types cataloged (name, email, IP, behavioral data, biometrics, etc.)
  • Data flows documented: collection → processing → storage → sharing → deletion
  • Purpose for each data type explicitly defined and limited
  • Legal basis for processing documented (consent, legitimate interest, contract, legal obligation)
  • Data retention periods defined per data type

Consent Management

  • GDPR: Granular consent obtained per processing purpose (not blanket acceptance)
  • GDPR: Consent as easy to withdraw as to give (one-click unsubscribe)
  • CCPA: Opt-out mechanism present for data sale/sharing ("Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information")
  • Consent records maintained (who consented, when, to what)
  • Cookie consent implemented for tracking cookies (GDPR only)

Consumer Rights Processing

  • Right of access request mechanism exists (DSR/DSAR portal or process)
  • Right to deletion honored within required timeframe (GDPR: 30 days, CCPA: 45 days)
  • Right to portability supported (GDPR: structured, machine-readable format)
  • Right to correct/rectify inaccurate data supported
  • DSR records maintained for 24+ months (audit trail)

Third-Party & Vendor Management

  • DPAs in place with all vendors processing personal data
  • Vendor list maintained and reviewed annually
  • Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) present for international data transfers
  • Sub-processor notifications in DPAs

Security Requirements

  • Reasonable security measures implemented (encryption at rest and in transit)
  • Access controls and principle of least privilege enforced
  • Breach notification procedure documented (GDPR: 72 hours to supervisory authority)
  • Security risk assessment conducted for processing activities

Step 3: Privacy-by-Design Review

Evaluate against Ann Cavoukian's 7 Foundational Principles:

PrincipleAssessment
1. Proactive, not reactiveIs privacy built in from design stage, not added after?
2. Privacy as defaultIs the most privacy-protective setting the default?
3. Privacy embedded in designIs privacy integral to system architecture, not a bolt-on?
4. Full functionalityDoes privacy coexist with legitimate business objectives?
5. End-to-end securityIs full lifecycle security ensured from collection to deletion?
6. Visibility & transparencyAre policies and practices open and verifiable?
7. Respect for user privacyIs user-centricity maintained in all design decisions?

Record each principle as: Implemented / Partial / Missing / Not Applicable

Step 4: ADA/WCAG Accessibility Audit

Evaluate against WCAG 2.1 AA (minimum standard) / WCAG 2.2 AA (current standard):

POUR Principles

  • Perceivable: All non-text content has text alternatives; audio/video has captions/transcripts; content is not restricted to color alone; minimum 4.5:1 contrast ratio for normal text
  • Operable: All functionality available via keyboard; no keyboard traps; skip navigation links present; sufficient time to interact; no content that seizures (no flashing >3Hz)
  • Understandable: Language of page set in HTML; error messages are descriptive and helpful; consistent navigation across pages; form labels and instructions clear
  • Robust: Valid HTML/ARIA; compatible with current assistive technologies; ARIA labels and roles correctly applied

AI Interface Specific (2025+)

  • Chatbot interfaces keyboard accessible and screen reader compatible
  • AI-generated content has proper semantic structure
  • Alt text provided for AI-generated images
  • Voice interfaces have visual alternatives

Severity Classification for Accessibility

  • CRITICAL: Completely blocks access for users with disabilities (missing keyboard navigation, no screen reader support)
  • HIGH: Significantly impedes usage (poor contrast, missing alt text on key images)
  • MEDIUM: Creates friction but workarounds exist (missing skip links, inconsistent labels)
  • LOW: Best practice improvement (decorative image has non-empty alt text)

Step 5: DPA Validation Checklist

If reviewing a Data Processing Agreement:

Required DPA Elements (GDPR Article 28)

  • Parties clearly identified (controller name/address, processor name/address)
  • Subject matter, nature, and purpose of processing defined
  • Type of personal data and categories of data subjects specified
  • Duration of processing specified
  • Controller obligations and rights documented
  • Processor obligations:

- Process only on documented controller instructions - Ensure confidentiality of processing personnel - Implement appropriate technical/organizational security measures - Sub-processor rules: require prior written consent; flow-down obligations - Assist controller with DSARs and Article 32-36 obligations - Delete or return data at end of service - Provide audit cooperation and information

  • International transfer mechanism specified (SCCs, adequacy decision, etc.)
  • Breach notification procedure: processor notifies controller without undue delay
  • DPA update trigger: reviewed annually or upon significant processing changes

DPA Quality Flags

  • No vague processing descriptions ("process data as needed") — specificity required
  • Security measures described with appropriate detail (encryption, access controls, staff training)
  • Sub-processor list available and maintained
  • Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) conducted for high-risk countries

Step 6: Regulatory Monitoring Guidance

Provide guidance on maintaining ongoing compliance:

Monitoring Sources

Monitoring Cadence

  • Monthly: Review enforcement actions from supervisory authorities
  • Quarterly: Check for new or amended state privacy laws
  • Annually: Full DPA review with all processors; full accessibility audit
  • On Change: Re-assess whenever data processing activities, vendors, or interfaces change materially

Step 7: Produce Compliance Decision

Output one of three decisions:

{
  "decision": "PASS | CONDITIONAL | FAIL",
  "regulationsAssessed": ["GDPR", "CCPA", "WCAG 2.1 AA", "DPA"],
  "assessmentDate": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "RC-001",
      "regulation": "GDPR",
      "severity": "CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW",
      "category": "Consent Management",
      "description": "Cookie consent banner missing for analytics tracking cookies",
      "status": "FAIL",
      "remediation": "Implement cookie consent platform with granular purpose-based opt-in",
      "owner": "developer",
      "deadline": "Before next deployment"
    }
  ],
  "requiredMitigations": [],
  "evidencePaths": [".claude/context/reports/compliance/"],
  "regulatoryLinks": [
    "https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/documents/public-consultations/2023/guidelines-032023-deceptive-design-patterns_en"
  ],
  "nextReviewDate": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "recommendedNextStep": "Assign RC-001 to developer agent; re-assess after remediation"
}

Decision Rules:

  • PASS: All applicable checklist items verified, no open findings
  • CONDITIONAL: Minor or medium findings present; allowed to proceed with documented remediation plan
  • FAIL: Critical or high findings present; must remediate before deployment

Output Protocol

Report Location

Save compliance reports to: .claude/context/reports/compliance/

Naming: {subject}-compliance-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md

Report Sections (Required)

  1. Scope definition (Step 1 output)
  2. GDPR/CCPA checklist results (Step 2)
  3. Privacy-by-design assessment (Step 3)
  4. Accessibility audit results (Step 4, if applicable)
  5. DPA validation (Step 5, if applicable)
  6. Structured decision JSON (Step 7)
  7. Remediation task list with owners and deadlines
  8. Regulatory monitoring recommendations

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsCorrect Approach
Checking GDPR only, ignoring CCPA/state lawsMulti-jurisdiction exposure missedAlways assess all applicable jurisdictions
Reporting PASS when most items passPartial compliance is non-complianceCONDITIONAL/FAIL for any open finding
Generic "implement encryption" remediationDeveloper cannot act on vague guidanceSpecific: "AES-256 encryption for PII fields in users table"
One-time audit treated as ongoing complianceRegulations change quarterlyEstablish continuous monitoring cadence
Treating accessibility as a nice-to-haveADA lawsuits are an active legal riskWCAG 2.1 AA compliance is non-negotiable for public interfaces
DPA with vague processing descriptionRegulators reject vague DPAsSpecify exact data types, processing purpose, retention periods

Enforcement Hooks

Input validated against schemas/input.schema.json before execution. Output contract defined in schemas/output.schema.json. Pre-execution hook: hooks/pre-execute.cjs Post-execution hook: hooks/post-execute.cjs (emits observability event)

Memory Protocol

Before starting:

cat .claude/context/memory/learnings.md

Check for:

  • Previous compliance assessments on similar systems
  • Known regulatory patterns and documented decisions
  • Outstanding compliance blockers in issues.md

After completing:

  • New compliance findings → Append to .claude/context/memory/issues.md
  • Regulatory decisions → Append to .claude/context/memory/decisions.md
  • Successful compliance patterns → Append to .claude/context/memory/learnings.md
ASSUME INTERRUPTION: Your context may reset. If it's not in memory, it didn't happen.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.06%
按下载量换算89

Claude

31.09%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

17.35%
按下载量换算41

Gemini CLI

9.96%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills