Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

oidc-integrationoidc 集成

Agent Skill

oidc-integration 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,958

周安装

170

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,387
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:oidc-integration(oidc 集成)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jeff-tian/oidc-integration
安装命令:
openclaw skills install oidc-integration
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install oidc-integration

简介

规划和实施前端和后端的 OIDC/OAuth2.0 集成。

  • 适用于 React/TypeScript 与 Java/Spring Boot 项目。
  • 通过 clawhub 安装, 需准备认证服务器配置信息。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • oidc-integration 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
oidc-integration
description
Plan and implement OIDC and OAuth 2.0 integration for React or TypeScript frontends and Java or Spring Boot backends. Use whenever the user mentions OIDC, OpenID Connect, OAuth login, SSO, PKCE, authorization code flow, refresh tokens, JWT or JWKS validation, login callback pages, protected routes, Keycloak, Auth0, IdentityServer, Authing, multi-provider auth, or "add login" and "integrate IdP" style requests even if they do not explicitly say OIDC.

OIDC Integration

Use this skill to design or implement authentication flows that rely on an OpenID Connect provider.

Objective

Help the user integrate OIDC in a way that matches their architecture, avoids unsafe defaults, and produces code that fits the current stack instead of dumping generic samples.

Working Style

Start by identifying the actual integration shape before writing code.

Check these points first:

  • Which side owns auth state: SPA only, backend session, or BFF.
  • Which provider is involved: Keycloak, Auth0, IdentityServer, Authing, Azure AD, or another OIDC-compliant IdP.
  • Whether there is one provider or multiple providers.
  • Whether the client is public or confidential.
  • Whether refresh tokens are required.
  • Whether the user needs login only, login plus logout, route protection, token validation, or full end-to-end flow.
  • Whether the codebase already uses auth libraries that should be extended rather than replaced.

If the user only needs one layer, stay scoped to that layer. Do not generate both frontend and backend integration unless the task actually spans both.

Security Defaults

Apply these defaults unless the user explicitly needs something different:

  • Prefer Authorization Code Flow.
  • For browser-based public clients, use PKCE.
  • Prefer provider metadata discovery from /.well-known/openid-configuration over hardcoding endpoints.
  • Prefer server-managed sessions or httpOnly cookies over storing long-lived tokens in localStorage.
  • If a pure SPA must hold tokens in browser storage, call out the tradeoff and keep token lifetime short.
  • Request offline_access only when refresh tokens are actually needed.
  • Validate iss, aud, signature, expiry, and key rotation behavior.
  • Treat logout as two separate concerns: local app logout and provider logout.

Do not normalize insecure shortcuts as the default recommendation.

Preferred Implementation Path

Prefer framework-native or well-supported libraries before hand-rolled auth code.

If the user asks for concrete implementation examples, read only the relevant reference file instead of expanding the main skill body:

  • references/react-spa.md for React or TypeScript SPA login, callback, guards, and API calls.
  • references/spring-resource-server.md for Spring Boot bearer-token validation and route protection.
  • references/multi-provider.md for dual-provider or multi-issuer setups.

Frontend

Prefer these options when they fit the existing stack:

  • oidc-client-ts
  • react-oidc-context
  • Existing auth wrapper already present in the repo

Generate custom PKCE and token exchange code only when the project constraints require it.

Spring Boot Backend

Prefer these options before writing custom JWT validation services:

  • spring-boot-starter-oauth2-client for login flows
  • spring-boot-starter-oauth2-resource-server for bearer token validation
  • Spring Security configuration over manual interceptors when standard resource server behavior is enough

Only fall back to manual JWKS lookup and custom validation logic when the provider or architecture requires non-standard behavior.

Implementation Checklist

When producing code or a plan, cover the relevant items below.

Frontend Deliverables

  • OIDC provider configuration
  • Login entry point
  • Callback handling
  • Auth state restoration on app startup
  • Route protection or guard logic
  • API client auth header strategy
  • Token refresh behavior if required
  • Logout flow
  • Return-to-original-page behavior after login
  • Multi-provider selection if applicable

Backend Deliverables

  • Provider configuration and environment variables
  • Metadata or JWKS discovery
  • Token validation strategy
  • User principal or claims mapping
  • Protected and public route rules
  • CORS and cookie strategy when frontend and backend are split
  • Multi-issuer handling if applicable

Architecture Guidance

Use the architecture that matches the product, not the most code-heavy option.

SPA Talking Directly to APIs

Use Authorization Code Flow with PKCE.

Include:

  • provider config
  • callback page
  • auth state provider
  • refresh strategy if needed
  • 401 retry or re-login behavior

Be explicit about token storage tradeoffs.

Backend or BFF Owns the Session

Prefer backend-managed sessions and httpOnly cookies.

This is usually the safer default when:

  • the backend already exists
  • the frontend is same-origin with the backend
  • the app does not need browser-side access tokens
  • the team wants to reduce token exposure in JavaScript

Multi-Provider Authentication

Keep provider-specific configuration explicit.

  • Separate provider configs.
  • Persist which provider initiated the login flow.
  • Keep callback handling able to resolve the active provider.
  • On the backend, support issuer-based selection rather than guessing.

Output Expectations

When responding to a user task, produce only what is needed for that repository and request.

Prefer this order:

  1. State the chosen flow and why it fits.
  2. List the files or components that need to exist.
  3. Implement the minimal complete path.
  4. Call out required environment variables and provider settings.
  5. Mention important follow-up checks such as logout, refresh, and expired-token handling.

Avoid pasting large tutorial blocks if the task only needs a narrow change.

Common Pitfalls

Watch for these failure modes:

  • Hardcoding token or JWKS endpoints instead of using discovery metadata.
  • Recommending implicit flow.
  • Storing refresh tokens in browser storage without acknowledging the risk.
  • Forgetting to persist and restore the original return URL.
  • Implementing refresh but not handling refresh failure.
  • Validating signature only, while skipping issuer or audience checks.
  • Assuming a single issuer when the app supports multiple providers.
  • Mixing frontend login concerns with backend bearer-token validation concerns.

Minimal Patterns

Use compact patterns instead of oversized examples.

Frontend Config Shape

export const oidcConfig = {
  authority: import.meta.env.VITE_OIDC_AUTHORITY,
  clientId: import.meta.env.VITE_OIDC_CLIENT_ID,
  redirectUri: `${window.location.origin}/auth/callback`,
  scope: 'openid profile email',
  responseType: 'code',
};

If the app is a public client, add PKCE support.

Spring Resource Server Direction

spring:
  security:
    oauth2:
      resourceserver:
        jwt:
          issuer-uri: https://idp.example.com

Prefer this direction over handwritten JWT parsing when standard Spring Security support is sufficient.

For fuller examples, read the relevant file from references/ rather than pasting every variant by default.

Verification

Before considering the integration complete, verify the relevant flows:

  • Login succeeds from a clean session.
  • Callback handles success and provider error responses.
  • Protected routes redirect or reject correctly.
  • Expired access tokens are handled correctly.
  • Refresh behavior works or fails cleanly.
  • Backend rejects tokens with wrong issuer or audience.
  • Logout clears local state and, when needed, signs out from the provider.

Final Reminder

This skill should help the model make a correct architectural choice first, then implement the smallest sound solution for that stack. Favor safe defaults, existing framework support, and repository-specific adaptation over generic auth boilerplate.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

74.37%
按下载量换算1,032

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills