Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

obsidian-study-vault-builderObsidian study vault 构建器

Agent Skill

obsidian-study-vault-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

954

周安装

41

GitHub Stars

46

下载量

335
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:obsidian-study-vault-builder(Obsidian study vault 构建器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/belumume/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/obsidian-study-vault-builder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/belumume/claude-skills --skill obsidian-study-vault-builder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/belumume/claude-skills --skill obsidian-study-vault-builder

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 支持基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索与筛选。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及联网或文件操作。
  • obsidian-study-vault-builder 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Obsidian Study Vault Builder

Comprehensive patterns for building exam-ready study vaults in Obsidian

Build structured, mobile-compatible academic study vaults with systematic error prevention, quality assurance, and efficiency patterns extracted from real-world projects.

⚠️ IMPORTANT: See REFERENCE.md for complete battle-tested patterns from 828KB/37-file vault projects.

When to Use This Skill

Invoke when building academic study materials in Obsidian for:

  • Final exam preparation (any subject)
  • Course knowledge organization (CS, medicine, business, law, etc.)
  • Self-study material structuring
  • Technical documentation vaults
  • Large-scale study projects (10+ files, 200KB+)

Works across all subjects:

  • Computer Science (algorithms, data structures, systems)
  • Medicine (anatomy, pharmacology, pathology)
  • Business (finance, marketing, operations)
  • STEM (physics, chemistry, engineering)
  • Humanities (history, literature, philosophy)

Core Methodology

Checkpoint-Based Workflow (Critical)

Never generate all chapters upfront. Use progressive validation:

  1. Chapter 1 Generation → STOP
  2. User Review → Approve format, structure, quality
  3. Chapters 2-N → Continue with validated pattern
  4. Final QA → Systematic verification

Why this matters:

  • Catches format issues before they multiply across 30+ files
  • Validates approach matches user needs early
  • Adjusts course when cheap (Chapter 1) vs expensive (Chapter 8)
  • Prevents 5+ hours of rework

Time breakdown: Chapter 1 (~30 min) → Review (~15 min) → Remaining (~90 min) → QA (~30 min) = 2.5 hours vs 80 hours manual

Memory File Hierarchy

Three-level context structure (see REFERENCE.md for details):

  • Level 1: Root vault (CLAUDE.md)
  • Level 2: Subject folder (School/CLAUDE.md)
  • Level 3: Course project (School/algorithms/CLAUDE.md)

Universal Obsidian Features (Mobile-First)

Use only: Mermaid diagrams, LaTeX math, standard callouts, internal links, tables, code blocks ❌ Never use: Dataview queries, custom callouts, plugins

See REFERENCE.md for complete patterns.


Error Pattern Recognition (8 Patterns)

Pattern 1: Unicode Corruption in Mermaid

  • Symptom: Diagrams fail to render
  • Diagnosis: grep -r "≤\|≥\|∞\|∈\|≠\|→" *.md
  • Fix: Replace with ASCII (<=, >=, infinity, in, !=, ->)

Pattern 2: Broken Tables (LaTeX Pipes)

  • Diagnosis: grep -r "| \$.*|.*\$" *.md
  • Fix: Escape pipes: |\|

Pattern 3: Missing Collapsible Solutions

  • Diagnosis: grep -A 5 "## Problem" practice-problems.md | grep -v "\[!example\]-"
  • Fix: Use > [!example]- Solution

Pattern 4-8: See REFERENCE.md

  • Inconsistent navigation
  • Missing learning objectives
  • Inconsistent TOC
  • Empty core concepts
  • Broken cross-references

Complete systematic fix approach in REFERENCE.md.


Content Quality Patterns

Applied Understanding (Not Memorization)

Good questions:

  • "Design [system] for [context]. Current [problem]. Describe solution to achieve [goal]. Analyze trade-offs and justify."

Adapts to subject:

  • CS: Algorithm design scenarios
  • Medicine: Case-based diagnosis
  • Business: Strategic analysis
  • Physics: Experimental design

Comprehensive Coverage

Every topic from source materials must appear. Validation: cross-reference source outline with vault TOC.

Cross-Reference Pattern

Link related concepts everywhere with [[links]].

See REFERENCE.md for complete examples.


Standard Vault Structure

course-name/
├── 00-overview/          # Course map, schedule, strategy
├── 01-chapter-name/      # Core concepts, quick-ref, practice
├── cross-chapter/        # Comparisons, patterns, catalog
└── mock-exams/           # Practice tests + solutions

Quality Assurance (Summary)

Before marking complete:

  • Structural consistency (navigation, objectives, TOC)
  • Content completeness (all topics covered)
  • Format correctness (no Unicode in Mermaid, LaTeX pipes escaped)
  • Mobile compatibility (no plugins)
  • Assessment alignment (practice matches exam style)

See REFERENCE.md for complete 50+ item checklist.


Common Anti-Patterns

  1. "I'll Fix It Later" → Fix immediately
  2. Generating Without Checkpoints → Chapter 1 → Review → Continue
  3. Forgetting Mobile Users → Universal features only
  4. Surface-Level Practice → Scenario-based with reasoning

Success Metrics

Typical project:

  • Files: 30-40
  • Size: 600-900KB
  • Coverage: 100% of source topics
  • Rendering errors: 0
  • Time saved: 80+ hours
  • Practice problems: 80-100
  • Mock exams: 2-3

Integration Patterns

Task Agents for Large Analysis

For 100+ pages of materials, use Task tool with subagent_type=Explore.

Git Workflow

git commit -m "Initial vault structure"
git commit -m "Complete Chapter 1 (checkpoint)"
git commit -m "Complete: Study vault (37 files, 828KB)"

CLI Integration

Obsidian CLI (v1.12+) complements the Write tool for specific operations. Requires Obsidian app running.

When to Use CLI vs Write Tool

OperationToolWhy
Creating new files (bulk)Write toolFaster, no shell overhead, no escaping
Setting/reading frontmatterCLI property:set/property:readNative YAML handling
Appending to existing filesCLI append/prependObsidian-aware, instant index update
Post-build QACLI search, unresolved, orphansUses Obsidian's live index
Vault state checksCLI files total, vault, sync:statusDirect access to Obsidian metadata

Post-Build Verification

Run after vault generation to catch issues:

obsidian.com files folder=<course> total        # Verify file count matches expected
obsidian.com tags counts                        # Verify tags are populated
obsidian.com unresolved                         # Find broken [[wiki-links]]
obsidian.com orphans                            # Find files with no incoming links
obsidian.com deadends                           # Find files with no outgoing links
obsidian.com search query="TODO"                # Catch unfinished placeholders

Frontmatter Operations

Use CLI instead of manual YAML editing for property manipulation:

obsidian.com property:set name=tags value="[exam-prep,chapter-1]" type=list path=<file>
obsidian.com property:set name=status value=draft path=<file>
obsidian.com property:read name=tags path=<file>

Incremental Updates

For adding content to existing vault files without full rewrites:

obsidian.com append path=<file> content="## New Section\n..."
obsidian.com daily:append content="- [ ] Review chapter 3"

Sync Awareness

Check sync state before/after large operations:

obsidian.com sync:status    # Verify sync is not paused before starting vault build

Additional Resources

See REFERENCE.md for:

  • Complete Obsidian universal features documentation
  • Detailed Mermaid diagram patterns (flowcharts, mind maps, graphs, recursion trees)
  • Detailed LaTeX notation patterns with table escaping
  • Collapsible solution complete templates
  • Full 50+ item quality assurance checklist with examples
  • Subject-specific adaptation examples (CS, medicine, business, humanities)
  • Complete step-by-step workflow example
  • Error pattern recognition (all 8 patterns with examples)
  • Systematic fix approach (5-step process)
  • Communication patterns that work
  • Anti-patterns to avoid
  • Time investment breakdowns

Battle-tested on:

  • 37-file academic vaults
  • 828KB comprehensive coverage
  • Multiple subjects (CS, engineering, business)
  • Zero rendering errors achieved
  • ~80 hours manual work saved per project

Ready to build exam-ready study vaults across any subject with systematic quality assurance.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.81%
按下载量换算103

Gemini CLI

25.49%
按下载量换算85

OpenCode

17.72%
按下载量换算59

Codex

12.25%
按下载量换算41

kilo

8.17%
按下载量换算27

Antigravity

3.68%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/belumume/claude-skills --skill obsidian-study-vault-builder;npx skills add belumume/claude-skills --skill "obsidian-study-vault-builder" 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills