Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

observability-llm-obsobservability LLM OBS 搜索

Agent Skill

observability-llm-obs 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,841

周安装

402

GitHub Stars

445

下载量

3,184
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:observability-llm-obs(observability LLM OBS 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/observability-llm-obs
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-llm-obs
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/elastic/agent-skills --skill observability-llm-obs

简介

结合 LLM 能力增强可观测性数据的语义理解。

  • 适用于日志分类、根因推断与智能告警场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从 elastic/agent-skills 安装。
  • 应评估模型调用成本与响应延迟对运维的影响。
  • observability-llm-obs 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

LLM and Agentic Observability

Answer user questions about monitoring LLMs and agentic components using data ingested into Elastic only. Focus on LLM performance, cost and token utilization, response quality, and call chaining or agentic workflow orchestration. Use ES|QL, Elasticsearch APIs, and (where needed) Kibana APIs. Do not rely on Kibana UI; the skill works without it. A given deployment typically uses one or more ingestion paths (APM/OTLP traces and/or integration metrics/logs)— discover what is available before querying.

Where to look

  • Trace and metrics data (APM / OTel): Trace data in Elastic is stored in **traces* when collected by the Elastic APM Agent, and in traces-generic.otel-default (and similar) when collected by OpenTelemetry. Use the generic pattern traces* to find all trace data regardless of source. When the application is instrumented with OpenTelemetry (e.g. Elastic Distributions of OpenTelemetry (EDOT), OpenLLMetry, OpenLIT, Langtrace exporting to OTLP), LLM and agent spans land in these trace data streams; metrics may land in metrics-apm* or metrics-generic. Query traces* and metrics*** data streams for per-request and aggregated LLM signals.
  • Integration metrics and logs: When the user collects data via Elastic LLM integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Amazon Bedrock, Bedrock AgentCore, GCP Vertex AI, etc.), metrics and logs go to integration data streams (e.g. metrics*, logs* with dataset/namespace per integration). Check which data streams exist.
  • Discover first: Use Elasticsearch to list data streams or indices (e.g. GET _data_stream, or GET traces*/_mapping, GET metrics*/_mapping) and optionally sample a document to see which LLM-related fields are present. Do not assume both APM and integration data exist.
  • ES|QL: Use the elasticsearch-esql skill for ES|QL syntax, commands, and query patterns when building queries against traces* or metrics data streams.
  • Alerts and SLOs: Use the Observability APIs SLOs API (Stack | Serverless) and Alerting API (Stack | Serverless) to find SLOs and alerting rules that target LLM-related data (e.g. services backed by traces*, or integration metrics). Firing alerts or violated/degrading SLOs point to potential degraded performance.

Data available in Elastic

From traces and metrics (traces*, metrics-apm* / metrics-generic)

Spans from OTel/EDOT (and compatible SDKs) carry span attributes that may follow OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions or provider-specific names. In Elasticsearch, attributes typically appear under span.attributes (exact key names depend on ingestion). Common attributes:

PurposeExample attribute names (OTel GenAI)
Operation / providergen_ai.operation.name, gen_ai.provider.name
Modelgen_ai.request.model, gen_ai.response.model
Token usagegen_ai.usage.input_tokens, gen_ai.usage.output_tokens
Request configgen_ai.request.temperature, gen_ai.request.max_tokens
Errorserror.type
Conversation / agentgen_ai.conversation.id; tool/agent spans as child spans

Cost is not in the OTel spec; some instrumentations add custom attributes (e.g. llm.response.cost.usd_estimate). Discover actual field names from the index mapping or a sample document (e.g. span.attributes.* or flattened keys).

Use duration and event.outcome on spans for latency and success/failure. Use trace.id, span.id, and parent/child span relationships to analyze call chaining and agentic workflows (e.g. one root span, multiple LLM or tool-call child spans).

From LLM integrations

Integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Azure AI Foundry, Bedrock, Bedrock AgentCore, Vertex AI, etc.) ship metrics (and where supported logs) to Elastic. Metrics typically include token usage, request counts, latency, and—where the integration supports it—cost-related fields. Logs may include prompt/response or guardrail events. Exact field names and data streams are defined by each integration package; discover them from the integration docs or from the target data stream mapping.

Determine what data is available

  1. List data streams: GET _data_stream and filter for traces*, metrics-apm* (or metrics*), and metrics-* / logs-* that match known LLM integration datasets (e.g. from Elastic LLM observability).
  2. Inspect trace indices: For traces*, run a small search or use mapping to see if spans contain gen_ai.* or llm.* (or similar) attributes. Confirm presence of token, model, and duration fields.
  3. Inspect integration indices: For metrics/logs data streams, check mapping or one document to see token, cost, latency, and model dimensions.
  4. Use one source per use case: If both APM and integration data exist, prefer one consistent source for a given question (e.g. use traces for per-request chain analysis, integration metrics for aggregate token/cost).
  5. Check alerts and SLOs: Use the SLOs API and Alerting API to list SLOs and alerting rules that target LLM-related services or integration metrics, and to get open or recently fired alerts. Firing alerts or SLOs in degrading/violated status point to potential degraded performance.

Use cases and query patterns

LLM performance (latency, throughput, errors)

  • Traces: ES|QL on traces* filtered by span attributes (e.g. gen_ai.operation.name or gen_ai.provider.name when present). Compute throughput (count per time bucket), latency (e.g. duration.us or span duration), and error rate (event.outcome == "failure") by model, service, or time.
  • Integrations: Query integration metrics for request rate, latency, and error metrics by model/dimension as exposed by the integration.

Cost and token utilization

  • Traces: Aggregate from spans in traces*: sum gen_ai.usage.input_tokens and gen_ai.usage.output_tokens (or equivalent attribute names) by time, model, or service. If a cost attribute exists (e.g. custom llm.response.cost.*), sum it for cost views.
  • Integrations: Use integration metrics that expose token counts and/or cost; aggregate by time and model.

Response quality and safety

  • Traces: Use event.outcome, error.type, and span attributes (e.g. gen_ai.response.finish_reasons) in traces* to identify failures, timeouts, or content filters. Correlate with prompts/responses if captured in attributes (e.g. gen_ai.input.messages, gen_ai.output.messages) and not redacted.
  • Integrations: Query integration logs for guardrail blocks, content filter events, or policy violations (e.g. Bedrock Guardrails) using the fields defined by that integration.

Call chaining and agentic workflow orchestration

  • Traces only: Use trace hierarchy in traces*. Filter by root service or trace attributes; group by trace.id and use parent/child span relationships (e.g. parent.id, span.id) to reconstruct chains (e.g. orchestration span → multiple LLM or tool-call spans). Aggregate by span name or gen_ai.operation.name to see distribution of steps (e.g. retrieval, LLM, tool use). Duration per span and per trace gives bottleneck and end-to-end latency.

Using ES|QL for LLM data

  • Availability: ES|QL is available in Elasticsearch 8.11+ (GA in 8.14) and in Elastic Observability Serverless.
  • Scoping: Always restrict by time range (@timestamp). When present, add service.name and optionally service.environment. For LLM-specific spans, filter by span attributes once you know the field names (e.g. a keyword field for gen_ai.provider.name or gen_ai.operation.name).
  • Performance: Use LIMIT, coarse time buckets when only trends are needed, and avoid full scans over large windows.

Workflow

LLM observability progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Determine available data (traces*, metrics-apm* or metrics*, or integration data streams)
- [ ] Step 2: Discover LLM-related field names (mapping or sample doc)
- [ ] Step 3: Run ES|QL or Elasticsearch queries for the user's question (performance, cost, quality, orchestration)
- [ ] Step 4: Check for active alerts or SLOs defined on LLM-related data (Alerting API, SLOs API); field names from
        Step 2 help identify related rules; firing alerts or violated/degrading SLOs indicate potential degraded performance
- [ ] Step 5: Summarize findings from ingested data only; include alert/SLO status when relevant

Examples

Example: Token usage over time from traces

Assume span attributes are available as span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens and span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens (adjust to actual field names from mapping):

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.provider.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS
    input_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.input_tokens),
    output_tokens = SUM(span.attributes.gen_ai.usage.output_tokens)
  BY BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour), span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| SORT @timestamp
| LIMIT 500

Example: Latency and error rate by model

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model IS NOT NULL
| STATS
    request_count = COUNT(*),
    failures = COUNT(*) WHERE event.outcome == "failure",
    avg_duration_us = AVG(span.duration.us)
  BY span.attributes.gen_ai.request.model
| EVAL error_rate = failures / request_count
| LIMIT 100

Example: Agentic workflow (trace-level view)

Get trace IDs that contain at least one LLM span and count spans per trace to see chain length:

FROM traces*
| WHERE @timestamp >= "2025-03-01T00:00:00Z" AND @timestamp <= "2025-03-01T23:59:59Z"
  AND span.attributes.gen_ai.operation.name IS NOT NULL
| STATS span_count = COUNT(*), total_duration_us = SUM(span.duration.us) BY trace.id
| WHERE span_count > 1
| SORT total_duration_us DESC
| LIMIT 50

Example: Integration metrics (Amazon Bedrock AgentCore)

The Amazon Bedrock AgentCore integration ships metrics to the metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-* data stream (time series index). Use TS for aggregations on time series data streams (Elasticsearch 9.2+); use a time range with TRANGE (9.3+). The integration’s dashboards and alerting rule templates Example: token usage (counter), invocations (counter), and average latency (gauge) by hour and agent:

TS metrics-aws_bedrock_agentcore.metrics-*
| WHERE TRANGE(7 days)
  AND aws.dimensions.Operation == "InvokeAgentRuntime"
| STATS
    total_tokens = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.TokenCount.sum)),
    total_invocations = SUM(RATE(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Invocations.sum)),
    avg_latency_ms = AVG(AVG_OVER_TIME(aws.bedrock_agentcore.metrics.Latency.avg))
  BY TBUCKET(1 hour), aws.bedrock_agentcore.agent_name
| SORT TBUCKET(1 hour) DESC

For Elasticsearch 8.x or when TS is not available, use FROM with BUCKET(@timestamp, 1 hour) and SUM/AVG over the metric fields (as in the integration's alert rule templates). For other LLM integrations (OpenAI, Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI, etc.), use that integration’s data stream index pattern and field names from its package (see Elastic LLM observability).

Guidelines

  • Data only in Elastic: Use only data collected and stored in Elastic (traces in traces*, metrics, or integration metrics/logs). Do not describe or rely on other vendors’ UIs or products.
  • One technology per customer: Assume a single ingestion path per deployment when answering; discover which (traces vs integration) exists and use it consistently for the question.
  • Discover field names: Before writing ES|QL or Query DSL, confirm LLM-related attribute or metric names from _mapping or a sample document; naming may differ (e.g. gen_ai.* vs llm.* or integration-specific fields).
  • No Kibana UI dependency: Prefer ES|QL and Elasticsearch APIs; use Kibana APIs only when needed (e.g. SLO, alerting). Do not instruct the user to open Kibana UI.
  • References: LLM and agentic AI observability, Observability Labs – LLM Observability, OpenTelemetry GenAI spans. For ES|QL syntax and query patterns, use the elasticsearch-esql skill, or look through ES|QL TS command reference for Elastic v9.3 or higher and for Serverless, and look through ES|QL FROM command reference for other Elastic versions.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.61%
按下载量换算1,198

Claude

27.76%
按下载量换算884

Cursor

19.41%
按下载量换算618

Gemini CLI

9.97%
按下载量换算317

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills