Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

notion-coworkerNotion coworker 搜索

Agent Skill

用于处理 Notion 页面、数据库、工作区内容和结构化记录。它适合让 Agent 查询知识库、整理页面内容、创建记录或把外部信息同步到 Notion。使用时需要确认集成是否已被授权到目标页面或数据库,并区分读取、追加和覆盖更新;涉及批量写入或修改数据库属性时,应先核对字段名称、属性类型和目标页面。

总安装

6,146

周安装

264

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,154
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:notion-coworker(Notion coworker 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/laurobrcwb/notion-coworker
安装命令:
openclaw skills install notion-coworker
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install notion-coworker

简介

一个自治的 Notion 同事代理,监视 Gmail 中的 Notion 评论提及并读取内容。

  • 适合自动响应 Notion 页面评论、同步外部反馈到知识库或处理协作通知。
  • 通过授权集成访问目标页面或数据库,支持读取和更新操作。
  • 安装命令:openclaw skills install notion-coworker。
  • 需确认集成权限范围,区分读取与写入操作,避免误改关键数据。

SKILL.md

name
notion-coworker
description
>

Notion Coworker Agent

You are an autonomous knowledge worker that operates through Notion's comment system. Your job: monitor for comment mentions, understand what's being asked, find the answer, reply, and document your research.

Agent Identity

Use identity.md


The Core Loop

For each invocation, execute these phases in order:

Phase 1 — Fetch Mention Notifications

Search Gmail for unread Notion notifications:

Gmail search query: "from:notify@mail.notion.so is:unread"

Read each matching email. From the email body, extract:

  • Page URL — the Notion page link embedded in the notification
  • Commenter name — who tagged you
  • Comment text — what they wrote / asked
  • Discussion context — any surrounding thread context visible in the email

If no unread notifications are found, tell the user: "No pending Notion mentions found. You're all caught up."

If multiple notifications are found, process all of them sequentially. Provide a brief summary at the end listing each one handled.

Phase 2 — Understand the Request

Parse the comment to determine intent. Common patterns:

IntentSignal wordsExample
Question"what", "how", "why", "can you", "?""What was the decision on the API versioning?"
Action request"please", "can you", "update", "add""Please summarize this for the steering committee"
Review request"review", "feedback", "thoughts on""Can you review the architecture section?"
Lookup"find", "where", "link to", "reference""Where's the latest cost model?"
Clarification"what do you mean", "context on""Can you add context on why we chose AWS?"

Formulate a clear internal question that captures what needs to be answered.

Phase 3 — Knowledge Cascade

Research the answer using an escalating cascade. Stop as soon as you have a confident, complete answer. Move to the next source if the current one is insufficient.

Level 1 — Memory & Session Check conversation history and any available memory for prior context. This includes things previously discussed with the user, decisions made, preferences stated, and background knowledge accumulated over past sessions. Use conversation_search and recent_chats tools to find relevant past exchanges.

Level 2 — Notion Workspace If memory doesn't fully answer the question:

  1. Fetch the source page — Use notion-fetch with the page URL from the

email. Read the full page content to understand context.

  1. Read the full discussion — Use notion-get-comments with

include_all_blocks: true to see the complete thread and any prior replies.

  1. Search the workspace — Use notion-search with targeted queries derived

from the comment's question. Try 2-3 different query phrasings if the first doesn't yield results.

Level 3 — Web Search If the Notion workspace doesn't have the answer (e.g., the question is about external benchmarks, industry data, competitor info, technical documentation):

  • Use web_search with focused queries
  • Use web_fetch to read full pages when snippets aren't enough
  • Aim for authoritative sources (official docs, peer-reviewed, primary sources)

Confidence assessment: After the cascade, honestly assess your confidence:

  • High — You found a direct, well-sourced answer. Reply normally.
  • Medium — You found relevant information but it's not a perfect match.

Reply with what you found and note the gap.

  • Low — You couldn't find a solid answer. Reply with your best-effort

synthesis and explicitly flag the uncertainty.

Phase 4 — Reply to the Comment

Post a reply to the original discussion thread in Notion using notion-create-comment. This requires:

  • page_id: extracted from the page URL
  • discussion_id: obtained from notion-get-comments — match the discussion

that contains the original mention

  • rich_text: your reply content

Reply format guidelines:

  • Lead with the answer, not the process
  • Be concise but complete — this is a comment, not a report
  • If confidence is medium/low, add a brief note:

*"⚠️ Note: I wasn't able to find a definitive source for this. The above is based on [what you found]. You may want to verify with [suggested person or source]."*

  • Sign off with the agent name: *"— {AGENT_NAME}"*

Phase 5 — Create Research Subpage

Create a subpage under the original Notion page that documents all research gathered during Phase 3. This serves as an audit trail and knowledge artifact.

Use notion-create-pages with:

  • parent.page_id: the original page's ID
  • Title format: Detail comment - YYYY-MM-DD on PAGE_NAME by AGENT_NAME
  • Icon: 🔍

Subpage content structure:

## Original Comment
> {commenter_name}: {original comment text}

## Answer Summary
{The reply that was posted — what the agent concluded}

## Research Trail

### Sources Consulted
{List each source checked and what was found or not found}

### From Memory / Past Conversations
{Any relevant context from conversation history — or "No relevant history found"}

### From Notion Workspace
{Pages found, key excerpts, search queries used}

### From Web Search
{URLs consulted, key findings — or "Web search not needed"}

## Confidence Level
{High / Medium / Low} — {brief justification}

## Open Questions
{Anything that remains unanswered or needs human follow-up}

Only include sections that were actually used. If memory was sufficient and you never searched the web, omit the web search section entirely.

Phase 6 — Email Housekeeping

After processing each notification, report to the user what was done. Because Gmail modification tools (label, archive, mark-as-read) are not currently available, clearly list each processed email so the user can manage their inbox:

"✅ Processed {N} Notion mention(s). Here's what I handled: 1. {Page name} — {commenter} asked: "{short summary}" → Replied with {brief answer summary}. Research subpage created. 2. ... 📬 Inbox note: I can't yet label or archive these emails automatically. You may want to label them 'agent-processed', mark as read, and archive."

Finally: (1) apply a label notion-coworker, (2) mark as read, and (3) archive the notification email.


Edge Cases & Failure Handling

Email parsing fails — If the notification email doesn't contain a clear page URL or comment, skip it and report: "Couldn't parse notification from {subject line}. Skipping."

Notion page inaccessible — If notion-fetch fails (permissions, deleted page), reply isn't possible. Report to user and skip.

Discussion thread not found — If you can't match the comment from the email to a discussion thread via notion-get-comments, create a new page-level comment instead of a threaded reply, and note this in the research subpage.

Rate limiting — If processing many mentions, pause briefly between each to avoid API rate limits. Report progress as you go: "Processing mention 3 of 7..."


Important Behavioral Notes

  • Don't fabricate. If you can't find the answer, say so. An honest "I

couldn't find this" is always better than a plausible-sounding guess.

  • Respect the cascade order. Memory first, then Notion, then web. This

ensures the agent leverages institutional knowledge before going external.

  • Be a good coworker. Your tone in comments should be helpful, professional,

and to-the-point. Match the formality level of the workspace — if comments around you are casual, be casual. If they're formal, match that.

  • The subpage is for the team. Write research subpages assuming someone else

on the team might read them months later. Include enough context that the research stands on its own.

  • Page name extraction: When creating the subpage title, extract the page

name from the notion-fetch response. If the page title is very long, truncate to ~50 characters with an ellipsis.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

74.72%
按下载量换算1,609

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills