Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索执行命令github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

multi-presence多重存在

Agent Skill

multi-presence 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

269

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

37

下载量

86
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:multi-presence(多重存在)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simhacker/moollm
仓库路径:skills/multi-presence
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill multi-presence
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill multi-presence

简介

管理 Agent 在多个环境中的运行状态。

  • 支持并行任务与资源监控。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 便于分布式协作与负载均衡。
  • 需配置独立上下文防止干扰。
  • multi-presence 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Multi-Presence

*"The same card, active in many rooms at once."*

What Is It?

Multi-Presence allows a single card (character, tool, skill) to be instantiated in multiple rooms simultaneously, each instance with its own state.

Like running the same program in multiple terminals. Same code, different contexts, parallel execution.


Why It Matters

Parallel Exploration

Send your researcher character to explore three branches at once:

research-room-A/
  → Researcher instance (exploring hypothesis A)

research-room-B/
  → Researcher instance (exploring hypothesis B)

research-room-C/
  → Researcher instance (exploring hypothesis C)

All three run in parallel. Compare results. Merge insights.

Cross-Pollination

The Debugger character in Room A notices something. The Debugger in Room B has context that helps. They can communicate:

[Room A: Debugger]
"I found a pattern but don't understand it."

[Room B: Debugger]
"That matches what I'm seeing here. Together it suggests..."

Same card, different vantages, shared insight.

Distributed Work

A large task splits across rooms:

Task: "Analyze all 50 documents"

document-batch-1/
  → Analyst instance (docs 1-10)

document-batch-2/
  → Analyst instance (docs 11-20)

[... etc ...]

aggregator/
  → Results flow in from all instances

How It Works

Playing a Card Multiple Times

> PLAY analyst-card IN room-A
Analyst instance created in room-A

> PLAY analyst-card IN room-B
Analyst instance created in room-B

> PLAY analyst-card IN room-C
Analyst instance created in room-C

Now analyst-card has three activations, each with independent state.

Instance State

Each activation has its own:

  • Local variables — what it's working on
  • Progress — how far along
  • Findings — what it's discovered
  • Tags — how to reference it
# room-A/activations/analyst-001.yml
card: analyst-card
instance_id: analyst-001
tags: [moollm, @hypothesis-A, @active]
state:
  current_document: "doc-007.pdf"
  findings:
    - "Pattern X detected"
  progress: 70%

Speed of Light Communication

Within one LLM call, all instances can communicate:

[LLM epoch]
  Analyst-A: "Found Pattern X in docs 1-10"
  Analyst-B: "Found Pattern Y in docs 11-20"
  Analyst-C: "Pattern X + Y together suggest Z!"
  Aggregator: "Capturing insight Z as primary finding"
[End epoch — all written to files]

No round-trips. Instant collaboration.


Actor Model

Multi-presence follows the Actor Model:

Actor ModelMulti-Presence
ActorCard activation
MailboxRoom's inbox
MessageThrown object
SpawnPLAY card
StateInstance YAML

Each activation is an independent actor with:

  • Own state
  • Own mailbox (room inbox)
  • Ability to spawn more actors
  • No shared mutable state (files are the state)

Consensus Building

Multiple instances can vote or reach consensus:

# Three reviewers examine a document
room-review/activations/
  reviewer-001.yml  # Vote: APPROVE
  reviewer-002.yml  # Vote: APPROVE
  reviewer-003.yml  # Vote: NEEDS_WORK

# Consensus protocol
consensus:
  method: majority
  votes: [APPROVE, APPROVE, NEEDS_WORK]
  result: APPROVE (2/3)

Example: Research Swarm

# research-project/
swarm:
  card: researcher-card
  instances: 5
  distribution:
    - room: literature-review/
      focus: "Prior work"
    - room: data-analysis/
      focus: "Dataset exploration"
    - room: methodology/
      focus: "Approach options"
    - room: experiments/
      focus: "Running tests"
    - room: writing/
      focus: "Draft sections"

coordination:
  sync_interval: "After each major finding"
  aggregation: "Weekly synthesis in main room"

Five researchers, one project, parallel progress.


Lifecycle

1. PLAY card IN room     → Activation created
2. Activation runs       → State updated
3. Activation finishes   → Can DELETE or TRANSFORM
4. TRANSFORM into result → Becomes output card

Activations can:

  • Complete and delete themselves
  • Transform into result cards
  • Spawn child activations
  • Merge with other instances
  • Block on async tool calls

Async Tool Calls

Activations can block waiting for external tools:

# room-A/activations/analyst-001.yml
card: analyst-card
status: blocked
blocked_on:
  tool: web-search
  query: "latest research on topic X"
  submitted: "2024-01-15T10:30:00"
  expected_duration: "~5 seconds"

The Coherence Engine leaves blocked activations alone:

Epoch scan:
  analyst-001: BLOCKED on web-search → skip
  analyst-002: ACTIVE → process
  analyst-003: ACTIVE → process

[web-search returns]

Next epoch:
  analyst-001: READY (result arrived) → resume
  analyst-002: ACTIVE → process
  analyst-003: BLOCKED on file-read → skip

Blocking States

StatusMeaning
activeRunning, process this epoch
blockedWaiting for tool result, skip
readyTool returned, resume processing
pausedUser paused, skip until resumed
completedDone, can be cleaned up

Tool Results

When a tool returns, the result is written to the activation:

# After web-search returns
card: analyst-card
status: ready
blocked_on: null
tool_results:
  - tool: web-search
    query: "latest research on topic X"
    completed: "2024-01-15T10:30:05"
    result:
      articles:
        - title: "New Findings on X"
          url: "https://..."

The activation resumes with the result in context.

Parallel Tool Calls

Multiple activations can have outstanding tool calls simultaneously:

analyst-001: blocked on web-search
analyst-002: blocked on file-read
analyst-003: blocked on api-call
analyst-004: active (no tool call)

[All tools return in parallel]

Next epoch: all four ready to process!

This is async/await for LLM agents — non-blocking, parallel, resumable.


Dovetails With


Protocol Symbols

MULTI-PRESENCE   — Same card in multiple rooms
ACTOR            — Independent activation with state
CARD-IN-PLAY     — An instantiated card
ACTIVATION       — Runtime instance of a card

See: PROTOCOLS.yml

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.12%
按下载量换算32

Claude

28.53%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

18.4%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

10.02%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill multi-presence 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills