Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

guardrails-safety-filter-builder护栏安全过滤器构建器

Agent Skill

guardrails-safety-filter-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

161

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

2

下载量

65
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:guardrails-safety-filter-builder(护栏安全过滤器构建器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/monkey1sai/openai-cli
仓库路径:skills/guardrails-safety-filter-builder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/monkey1sai/openai-cli --skill guardrails-safety-filter-builder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/monkey1sai/openai-cli --skill guardrails-safety-filter-builder

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位资料。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始文档进一步验证功能。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发联网。
  • 注意维护状态与数据访问限制。guardrails-safety-filter-builder 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Guardrails & Safety Filter Builder

Build comprehensive safety systems for LLM applications.

Safety Layers

  1. Input filtering: Block malicious prompts
  2. Output filtering: Redact sensitive data
  3. Topic constraints: Policy-based refusals
  4. PII detection: Mask personal information
  5. Prompt injection: Detect manipulation attempts

PII Detection & Redaction

import re
from presidio_analyzer import AnalyzerEngine
from presidio_anonymizer import AnonymizerEngine

analyzer = AnalyzerEngine()
anonymizer = AnonymizerEngine()

def redact_pii(text: str) -> str:
    # Detect PII
    results = analyzer.analyze(
        text=text,
        language='en',
        entities=["EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "CREDIT_CARD", "SSN"]
    )

    # Anonymize
    anonymized = anonymizer.anonymize(text, results)
    return anonymized.text

# Example: "My email is john@example.com" → "My email is <EMAIL_ADDRESS>"

Prompt Injection Detection

def detect_prompt_injection(user_input: str) -> bool:
    """Detect common prompt injection patterns"""
    patterns = [
        r'ignore (previous|above) instructions',
        r'disregard (all|any) (prior|previous)',
        r'you are now',
        r'new instructions',
        r'system:',
        r'override',
    ]

    for pattern in patterns:
        if re.search(pattern, user_input, re.IGNORECASE):
            return True

    return False

# Block if detected
if detect_prompt_injection(user_input):
    return "I cannot process that request."

Topic Constraints

# Define allowed/disallowed topics
POLICY = {
    "allowed_topics": [
        "product_features",
        "troubleshooting",
        "billing",
        "account_management"
    ],
    "disallowed_topics": [
        "medical_advice",
        "legal_advice",
        "financial_advice",
        "politics",
        "violence"
    ],
    "requires_disclaimer": [
        "security_practices",
        "data_privacy"
    ]
}

# Classify topic
def classify_topic(query: str) -> str:
    classification_prompt = f"""
    Classify this query into one of these topics:
    {', '.join(POLICY['allowed_topics'] + POLICY['disallowed_topics'])}

    Query: {query}

    Return only the topic name.
    """
    return llm(classification_prompt)

# Check policy
def check_policy(query: str) -> dict:
    topic = classify_topic(query)

    if topic in POLICY["disallowed_topics"]:
        return {
            "allowed": False,
            "reason": f"Cannot provide {topic}",
            "refusal": REFUSAL_TEMPLATES[topic]
        }

    return {"allowed": True, "topic": topic}

Refusal Templates

REFUSAL_TEMPLATES = {
    "medical_advice": """
        I cannot provide medical advice. Please consult with a healthcare
        professional for medical concerns.
    """,
    "legal_advice": """
        I cannot provide legal advice. For legal matters, please consult
        with a qualified attorney.
    """,
    "out_of_scope": """
        I'm designed to help with product documentation and support.
        This question is outside my area of expertise.
    """,
}

def refuse_safely(reason: str) -> str:
    return REFUSAL_TEMPLATES.get(reason, REFUSAL_TEMPLATES["out_of_scope"])

Output Validation

def validate_output(output: str) -> dict:
    """Check output before returning to user"""
    issues = []

    # Check for PII
    pii_results = analyzer.analyze(output, language='en')
    if pii_results:
        issues.append("Contains PII")
        output = redact_pii(output)

    # Check for banned phrases
    banned_phrases = ["password", "api key", "secret"]
    for phrase in banned_phrases:
        if phrase.lower() in output.lower():
            issues.append(f"Contains banned phrase: {phrase}")

    # Check toxicity
    toxicity_score = toxicity_classifier(output)
    if toxicity_score > 0.7:
        issues.append("High toxicity detected")

    return {
        "safe": len(issues) == 0,
        "issues": issues,
        "sanitized_output": output
    }

Complete Guardrail Pipeline

def apply_guardrails(user_input: str) -> dict:
    # 1. Input validation
    if detect_prompt_injection(user_input):
        return {
            "allowed": False,
            "response": "Invalid request detected."
        }

    # 2. Policy check
    policy_check = check_policy(user_input)
    if not policy_check["allowed"]:
        return {
            "allowed": False,
            "response": policy_check["refusal"]
        }

    # 3. Generate response
    response = llm(user_input)

    # 4. Output validation
    validation = validate_output(response)
    if not validation["safe"]:
        return {
            "allowed": True,
            "response": validation["sanitized_output"],
            "warnings": validation["issues"]
        }

    return {
        "allowed": True,
        "response": response
    }

Best Practices

  • Layer multiple defenses
  • Log all blocked requests
  • Provide helpful refusals
  • Redact, don't reject when possible
  • Regular pattern updates
  • Human review of edge cases

Output Checklist

  • PII detection implemented
  • Prompt injection detection
  • Topic classification
  • Policy constraints defined
  • Refusal templates written
  • Output validation
  • Logging/monitoring
  • Test cases for bypasses

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.74%
按下载量换算24

Claude

29.24%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

17.46%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

9.38%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills