Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

performance-review绩效考核

Agent Skill

performance-review 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

235

周安装

10

GitHub Stars

283

下载量

82
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performance-review(绩效考核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/performance-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review

简介

performance-review 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 建议结合原始 README 进一步核验具体用法和功能边界。

SKILL.md

Performance Review Skill

This skill turns rough notes, bullet points, or bullet-point memories into a complete, professionally written performance review. Output is ready to submit or use as a strong first draft.

Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Review type (Self-assessment / Manager review / Peer/360 / Upward feedback)
  • Review period (e.g. H1 2025, Q2 2025, Annual)
  • Name of person being reviewed (or "myself" for self-assessment)
  • Role / level
  • Key achievements or notable work (rough notes are fine)
  • Areas where they struggled or could improve (be honest — reviews without growth areas aren't credible)
  • Key projects or deliverables from the period
  • Company values or competencies to assess against (optional — if provided, structure the review around them)
  • Overall rating/recommendation (if the form requires one)

Output Structure


Performance Review: [Name]

Role: [Title / Level] Review period: [Period] Review type: [Manager / Self / Peer / Upward] Reviewed by: [If known]


Overall Summary

[3–5 sentences. High-level characterisation of the period. Acknowledge standout contributions. Be specific — use project names and outcomes, not vague praise. For self-assessments, this should reflect honestly on the period without underselling or overselling.]


Achievements & Impact

[3–5 achievements, each structured as:]

[Achievement title — specific and concrete] [2–4 sentences. What was the context? What did [name] do specifically? What was the measurable or observable outcome? Avoid generic praise — every sentence should be something only this person could have done.]


Strengths Demonstrated

[3–4 bullet points. Each bullet = one strength, with one concrete example from the review period. No abstract traits without evidence.]

  • [Strength]: [Example — specific project or behaviour that demonstrated this]

Areas for Growth

[2–3 areas. Be direct and constructive — not vague. Frame as "opportunity to develop" not "failure." Each should include:]

[Area name]

  • Observed pattern: [What was noticed — be specific, not personal]
  • Why it matters: [Impact on team, output, or career progression]
  • Suggested development: [One concrete action — e.g. "Take on [X] responsibility next half" or "Shadow [role] on [process]"]

Development Goals for Next Period

[2–3 goals. Format each as:]

Goal [N]: [Clear, outcome-oriented goal]

  • Why: [Connection to growth areas or career aspirations]
  • How to measure: [What "done" looks like]
  • Support needed: [Resources, training, or manager input required]

Competency Ratings (if framework provided)

CompetencyRatingEvidence
[Competency from company framework][Exceeds / Meets / Developing / Below][One-sentence example]

Closing Recommendation

[2–3 sentences. For manager reviews: overall assessment and any promotion/compensation recommendation. For self-assessments: what you're asking for or committing to. For peer reviews: one sentence on what it's like to work with this person.]


Writing Rules

  • Never use vague phrases: "strong communicator," "team player," "hardworking" — always back with evidence
  • Growth areas must be honest — reviewers who only write positives lose credibility and help no one
  • Use third person for manager/peer reviews, first person for self-assessments
  • Avoid jargon — "drove alignment" and "leveraged synergies" are meaningless. Use plain language.
  • If the user gives sparse notes, ask for one concrete example per achievement before writing

Quality Checks

  • Every achievement includes a specific outcome (not just activity)
  • Strengths have concrete examples from the review period
  • Growth areas are honest and constructive (not softened to meaninglessness)
  • Development goals are measurable
  • No vague phrases without evidence
  • Tone is professional and fair throughout

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Write a performance review for [name] based on these notes: [paste notes]"
  • "Help me write my self-assessment for [period]"
  • "Draft a peer review for my colleague who did [description]"
  • "Turn these bullet points into a full performance review: [paste bullets]"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.49%
按下载量换算28

Claude

30.35%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

19.36%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.77%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills