Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

model-verify-flagos模型验证 flagos

Agent Skill

model-verify-flagos 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

474

周安装

19

GitHub Stars

9

下载量

154
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:model-verify-flagos(模型验证 flagos)
来源仓库:https://github.com/flagos-ai/skills
仓库路径:skills/model-verify-flagos
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/flagos-ai/skills --skill model-verify-flagos
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/flagos-ai/skills --skill model-verify-flagos

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需确认权限和维护状态。
  • 涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写时,应先评估安全风险和操作边界。
  • 建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能细节。

SKILL.md

Target Model Verification

Same layer-peeling approach as env-verify, but with the real target model that may require multi-GPU tensor parallelism. Runs the model twice (without and with multi-chip stack) and diffs results to isolate failures.

Skill Components

model-verify/
├── SKILL.md                            # This file — execution flow
├── scripts/
│   └── diff_analysis.py                # Compare Run A vs Run B, classify errors (JSON)
└── references/
    └── multichip-errors.md             # Multi-chip error patterns and diff truth table

Reused from env-verify:

  • env-verify/scripts/run_offline_inference.py — Phase A test (parameterized)
  • env-verify/scripts/test_serve_mode.py — Phase B test (parameterized)
  • env-verify/references/error-classification.md — Layer-based error rules

Prerequisites

  • Running container with software stack installed (from install-stack)
  • env-verify completed (at least Phase A passed)
  • User must provide model path

If invoked standalone, ask for container name, vendor, and model path. If invoked from /flagrelease, these are passed as context.

Execution Flow

Step 1: Get Model Info from User

Ask the user for (use AskUserQuestion if not provided):

  1. Model path (required) — local path inside container OR ModelScope/HuggingFace ID
  2. --tensor-parallel-size (optional) — default to GPU count
  3. Additional vllm args (optional)

Get default TP size:

docker exec <CONTAINER> python3 -c "
import torch; print(torch.cuda.device_count() if torch.cuda.is_available() else 1)
"

If user does not provide model path → ask and wait. Do not guess.

Step 2: Download Model (if needed)

If model path is a remote ID (not starting with /):

docker exec <CONTAINER> python3 -c "
from modelscope import snapshot_download
snapshot_download('<MODEL_ID>', local_dir='/data/models/<MODEL_NAME>')
"

If local directory, verify config.json exists:

docker exec <CONTAINER> test -f <MODEL_PATH>/config.json

Timeout: 600s for large model downloads.

Step 3: Run A — WITHOUT Multi-Chip Stack

Copy the test scripts from env-verify into the container (if not already there):

docker cp <ENV_VERIFY_DIR>/scripts/run_offline_inference.py <CONTAINER>:/tmp/
docker cp <ENV_VERIFY_DIR>/scripts/test_serve_mode.py <CONTAINER>:/tmp/

Phase A (offline):

docker exec <CONTAINER> bash -c '
export USE_FLAGGEMS=0
unset FLAGCX_PATH
timeout 300 python3 /tmp/run_offline_inference.py \
    --model <MODEL_PATH> \
    --tp <TP_SIZE> \
    --trust-remote-code
' > /tmp/run_a_offline.json

Phase B (serve):

docker exec <CONTAINER> bash -c '
export USE_FLAGGEMS=0
unset FLAGCX_PATH
timeout 360 python3 /tmp/test_serve_mode.py \
    --model <MODEL_PATH> \
    --tp <TP_SIZE> \
    --trust-remote-code \
    --health-timeout 300
' > /tmp/run_a_serve.json

Step 4: Run B — WITH Full Multi-Chip Stack

Skip logic: If ALL of FlagGems, FlagTree, FlagCX failed install → skip Run B. Report: "Run B skipped: no multi-chip packages installed." Check install-stack results to decide.

Phase A (offline):

docker exec <CONTAINER> bash -c '
export USE_FLAGGEMS=1
export FLAGCX_PATH=/tmp/FlagCX
export VLLM_PLUGINS=fl
timeout 300 python3 /tmp/run_offline_inference.py \
    --model <MODEL_PATH> \
    --tp <TP_SIZE> \
    --trust-remote-code
' > /tmp/run_b_offline.json

Phase B (serve):

docker exec <CONTAINER> bash -c '
export USE_FLAGGEMS=1
export FLAGCX_PATH=/tmp/FlagCX
export VLLM_PLUGINS=fl
timeout 360 python3 /tmp/test_serve_mode.py \
    --model <MODEL_PATH> \
    --tp <TP_SIZE> \
    --trust-remote-code \
    --health-timeout 300
' > /tmp/run_b_serve.json

Step 5: Diff Analysis

Copy and run scripts/diff_analysis.py to compare the two runs:

docker cp <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/diff_analysis.py <CONTAINER>:/tmp/
docker exec <CONTAINER> python3 /tmp/diff_analysis.py \
    --run-a /tmp/run_a_offline.json \
    --run-b /tmp/run_b_offline.json

Read references/multichip-errors.md to interpret the diff and classify errors.

Step 6: Produce Report

{
  "status": "PASS | PARTIAL | FAIL",
  "stage": "model-verify",
  "model": "<MODEL_PATH>",
  "tensor_parallel_size": 8,
  "run_a_without_multichip": {
    "flags": {"USE_FLAGGEMS": "0", "FLAGCX_PATH": "unset"},
    "phase_a_offline": "PASS | FAIL",
    "phase_b_serve": "PASS | FAIL",
    "output_sample": "...",
    "errors": []
  },
  "run_b_with_multichip": {
    "flags": {"USE_FLAGGEMS": "1", "FLAGCX_PATH": "/tmp/FlagCX"},
    "skipped": false,
    "phase_a_offline": "PASS | FAIL",
    "phase_b_serve": "PASS | FAIL",
    "output_sample": "...",
    "errors": []
  },
  "diff_analysis": {
    "conclusion": "BOTH_PASS | MULTICHIP_ERROR | SAME_ERROR | DIFFERENT_ERRORS",
    "detail": "...",
    "multichip_component": "FlagGems | FlagTree | FlagCX | plugin | null",
    "recommended_stack": "full | base | none"
  }
}

recommended_stack — tells downstream skills which stack to use:

  • full — Run B passed (USE_FLAGGEMS=1, FLAGCX_PATH set)
  • base — only Run A passed (USE_FLAGGEMS=0, FLAGCX_PATH unset)
  • none — Run A also failed (model can't serve)

Status logic:

  • PASS — both Run A and Run B succeed
  • PARTIAL — Run A passes, Run B fails
  • FAIL — Run A fails

Error Handling

FailureBehavior
Model path not providedAsk user, wait
Model path not foundReport exact path, exit with error
Model too large for memoryReport OOM, suggest reducing TP or dtype
TP > available GPUsReport "requested TP=X but only Y available"
Server hangsKill after timeout, capture last logs
Run A and Run B both failReport both errors separately

Rule: Run BOTH runs regardless of individual failures. Maximize error coverage.

Timeout Rules

OperationTimeout
Model download600s
Phase A (offline)300s
Phase B (serve + test)360s

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.51%
按下载量换算53

Claude

27.61%
按下载量换算43

Cursor

19.37%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.3%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills