Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

moa恐鸟

Agent Skill

moa 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

21,333

周安装

863

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

6,697
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:moa(恐鸟)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jscianna/moa
安装命令:
openclaw skills install moa
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install moa

简介

混合代理:让 3 个前沿模型进行争论,然后将他们的最佳见解综合成一个更好的答案。 ~$0.03/查询。

SKILL.md

name
moa
description
Mixture of Agents: Make 3 frontier models argue, then synthesize their best insights into one superior answer. ~$0.03/query.
author
John Scianna (@Scianna)
version
1.2.0
requires
cost
~$0.03 per query (paid tier)

Mixture of Agents (MoA)

TL;DR: Make 3 AI models argue with each other. Get an answer better than any single model. Cost: ~$0.03.

Two Usage Modes

A. Standalone CLI (Node.js)

export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="your-key"
node scripts/moa.js "Your complex question"

B. OpenClaw Skill (Agent-orchestrated)

# Install
clawhub install moa

# Or copy to ~/clawd/skills/moa/

The agent can then invoke MoA for complex analysis tasks.


Origin Story

The concept of "Mixture of Agents" comes from research showing LLMs can improve each other's outputs through collaboration. I built this for VC deal analysis—when evaluating startups, you want multiple perspectives, not one model's opinion.

The journey:

  1. Started with 5 free OpenRouter models (Llama, Gemini, Mistral, Qwen, Nemotron)
  2. Rate limits killed me at 2am during peak hours
  3. Switched to 3 paid frontier specialists
  4. Result: ~$0.03/query, answers better than any single model

When to Use

  • Complex analysis — due diligence, market research, technical evaluation
  • Brainstorming — get diverse ideas, synthesize the best
  • Fact-checking — cross-reference across models with different training data
  • High-stakes decisions — when one model's blind spots could hurt you
  • Contrarian thinking — different models have different biases

When NOT to use:

  • Quick Q&A (too slow, 30-90s latency)
  • Real-time chat (not designed for streaming)
  • Simple lookups (overkill)

Model Configuration

Paid Tier (Default) — Recommended

RoleModel~LatencyStrength
Proposer 1moonshotai/kimi-k2.523sLong context, strong reasoning
Proposer 2z-ai/glm-536sTechnical depth, different training corpus
Proposer 3minimax/minimax-m2.564sNuance catching, thorough analysis
Aggregatormoonshotai/kimi-k2.515sFast synthesis

Why these models?

  • Frontier-class but less congested than GPT-4/Claude
  • Different training data = genuinely different perspectives
  • Chinese models excel at certain reasoning tasks
  • Combined cost still cheaper than single Opus call

Cost breakdown:

3 proposers × ~$0.008 = $0.024
1 aggregator × ~$0.005 = $0.005
─────────────────────────────
Total: ~$0.029/query

Free Tier (Fallback)

5 models: Llama 3.3 70B, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Mistral Small, Nemotron 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B

⚠️ Warning: Free tier hits rate limits during peak hours. Use --free flag only for testing.


How It Works

        ┌─────────────┐
        │   PROMPT    │
        └──────┬──────┘
               │
    ┌──────────┼──────────┐
    ▼          ▼          ▼
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌────────┐
│Kimi 2.5│ │ GLM 5  │ │MiniMax │  ← Parallel (they "argue")
│(reason)│ │(depth) │ │(nuance)│
└───┬────┘ └───┬────┘ └───┬────┘
    │          │          │
    └──────────┼──────────┘
               ▼
       ┌──────────────┐
       │  AGGREGATOR  │
       │  (Kimi 2.5)  │
       │              │
       │ • Best of 3  │
       │ • Resolve    │
       │   conflicts  │
       │ • Synthesize │
       └──────┬───────┘
              ▼
       ┌──────────────┐
       │ FINAL ANSWER │
       │ (Synthesized)│
       └──────────────┘

API Reference

Function Signature

interface MoAOptions {
  prompt: string;           // Required: The question to analyze
  tier?: 'paid' | 'free';   // Default: 'paid'
}

interface MoAResult {
  synthesis: string;        // The final aggregated answer
}

// Throws on complete failure (all models down, invalid key)
// Returns partial synthesis if 1-2 models fail
async function handle(options: MoAOptions): Promise<string>

CLI Usage

# Paid tier (default)
node scripts/moa.js "Your complex question"

# Free tier
node scripts/moa.js "Your question" --free

Programmatic Usage

const { handle } = require('./scripts/moa.js');

const synthesis = await handle({ 
  prompt: "Analyze the competitive moats in AI code generation",
  tier: 'paid'
});

console.log(synthesis);

Failure Modes

ScenarioBehavior
1 proposer failsSynthesis from remaining 2 models
2 proposers failSynthesis from 1 model (degraded)
All proposers failReturns error message
Invalid API keyImmediate error with setup instructions
Rate limit (free tier)Returns rate limit error

The system is designed to degrade gracefully. A 2/3 response is still valuable.


Example Use Cases

VC Due Diligence

node scripts/moa.js "Analyze the competitive landscape for AI code generation. \
Who has defensible moats? Who's likely to be commoditized? Be specific."

Technical Evaluation

node scripts/moa.js "Compare RLHF vs DPO vs RLAIF for LLM alignment. \
Which scales better? What are the failure modes of each?"

Market Research

node scripts/moa.js "What are the emerging use cases for embodied AI in 2026? \
Focus on robotics, drones, and autonomous systems. Include specific companies."

Performance Expectations

MetricPaid TierFree Tier
P50 Latency~45s~60s
P95 Latency~90s~120s+
Success Rate>99%~80% (rate limits)
Cost/Query~$0.03$0.00

Tips

  1. Be specific — Vague prompts get vague synthesis
  2. Ask for structure — "Give me pros/cons" or "List top 5" helps the aggregator
  3. Use for analysis, not chat — MoA shines for complex reasoning
  4. Batch your queries — 30-90s per query, so plan accordingly

Installation

Via ClawHub (Recommended)

clawhub install moa

Manual

  1. Copy skills/moa/ to your ~/clawd/skills/ directory
  2. Set OPENROUTER_API_KEY in your environment
  3. The agent can now invoke MoA for complex queries

Environment Variables

VariableRequiredDescription
OPENROUTER_API_KEYYesYour OpenRouter API key

Get your key at: https://openrouter.ai/keys


Credits

适合场景

01

调用多模型

02

代码和文本生成

03

Agent 推理流程

04

OpenRouter 模型接入

能力概览

能力 1

统一调用多种 LLM

能力 2

支持 Claude、Gemini、Kimi 等模型

能力 3

适合聊天、代码和推理任务

能力 4

可作为 Agent 模型调用入口

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.84%
按下载量换算5,347

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills