Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

migration-compass迁移指南针

Agent Skill

migration-compass 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,082

周安装

371

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

2,938
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:migration-compass(迁移指南针)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jcools1977/migration-compass
安装命令:
openclaw skills install migration-compass
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install migration-compass

简介

提供通用迁移路径规划与实施指导。migration-compass 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

  • 支持框架、库、语言与数据库间的转换分析。
  • 生成分步迁移方案与风险评估报告。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。
  • 输入源与目标技术栈后可自动匹配最佳实践。
  • 建议结合项目实际情况调整推荐步骤。

SKILL.md

name
migration-compass
version
1.0.0
description
>
author
J. DeVere Cooley
category
everyday-tools
tags
metadata
openclaw
emoji
🧭
os
["darwin", "linux", "win32"]
cost
free
requires_api
false
tags

Migration Compass

"Every failed migration has the same obituary: 'We started replacing everything at once, got halfway, ran out of time, and now we have two systems.'"

What It Does

You need to migrate. Maybe it's Express → Fastify. Maybe it's JavaScript → TypeScript. Maybe it's MySQL → PostgreSQL. Maybe it's React class components → hooks. Maybe it's a monolith → microservices.

You know where you are. You know where you want to be. You don't know the safe path between them — the order that lets you change incrementally, validate at each step, and roll back if something goes wrong, all while keeping production running.

Migration Compass generates that path.

The Migration Model

Every migration follows the same fundamental structure, regardless of what's being migrated:

STATE A (current) ────── TRANSITION ────── STATE B (target)
                    │
                    ├── Parallel Run Zone (both states coexist)
                    ├── Rollback Points (safe places to reverse)
                    ├── Validation Gates (proof each step worked)
                    └── Strangler Boundary (old → new interface)

The Three Migration Laws

Law 1: Never Big-Bang Change one thing at a time. Validate. Proceed or roll back. A migration that requires changing everything simultaneously is not a migration — it's a rewrite disguised as a migration.

Law 2: Parallel Before Replace The new system must run alongside the old system before it replaces it. You need proof it works in production before you remove the old one.

Law 3: Every Step Must Be Deployable At no point during the migration should the codebase be in a state that can't be deployed to production. Every commit is a valid checkpoint.

Migration Types

Type 1: Library Swap

*Replace one library with another (same language, same purpose)*

Example: moment.jsdate-fns

COMPASS ROUTE:
├── Step 1: AUDIT
│   ├── Find every import of moment (grep analysis)
│   ├── Catalog every moment function you use
│   ├── Map each moment function → date-fns equivalent
│   └── Identify any moment features with no date-fns equivalent
│
├── Step 2: INSTALL PARALLEL
│   ├── npm install date-fns (alongside moment, not replacing)
│   ├── Create adapter module: src/utils/date-adapter.ts
│   │   └── Exports your date operations, internally calls moment OR date-fns
│   └── ✅ Deploy. Both libraries installed. Only moment used.
│
├── Step 3: MIGRATE CONSUMERS (one at a time)
│   ├── Change import from 'moment' → import from 'date-adapter'
│   ├── Do NOT change behavior — adapter calls moment internally
│   ├── ✅ Deploy after each file. Rollback = revert one file.
│   └── Repeat until all consumers use adapter
│
├── Step 4: SWAP INTERNALS
│   ├── Inside date-adapter, change implementation from moment → date-fns
│   ├── Run tests. Compare outputs.
│   ├── ✅ Deploy. If issues, revert adapter internals only (one file).
│   └── Monitor for edge cases (timezone, locale, formatting)
│
├── Step 5: CLEANUP
│   ├── Remove moment from package.json
│   ├── Optionally inline adapter (or keep for future flexibility)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy.
│   └── Total migration: N small PRs, zero downtime, full rollback at each step
│
└── ROLLBACK POINTS: Every step. Maximum rollback cost: 1 file revert.

Type 2: Framework Migration

*Replace one framework with another (same language)*

Example: ExpressFastify

COMPASS ROUTE:
├── Step 1: AUDIT
│   ├── Catalog all routes (count, complexity, middleware usage)
│   ├── Catalog all middleware (auth, logging, CORS, etc.)
│   ├── Identify Express-specific patterns (req/res augmentation, etc.)
│   └── Map Express concepts → Fastify equivalents
│
├── Step 2: STRANGLER FACADE
│   ├── Introduce a reverse proxy (or route splitter) in front of Express
│   ├── All traffic → Express (no change in behavior)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy. Verify no change.
│   └── This proxy will later split traffic between Express and Fastify
│
├── Step 3: PARALLEL INSTANCE
│   ├── Stand up Fastify instance alongside Express
│   ├── Migrate ONE low-risk route (health check, static asset, etc.)
│   ├── Route proxy: /health → Fastify, everything else → Express
│   ├── ✅ Deploy. Verify Fastify serves /health correctly.
│   └── Rollback: Route /health back to Express
│
├── Step 4: INCREMENTAL ROUTE MIGRATION
│   ├── Migrate routes one at a time (or in small batches)
│   ├── Order: lowest risk → highest risk
│   │   ├── Static routes (no state, no auth)
│   │   ├── Read-only authenticated routes
│   │   ├── Write routes (mutations)
│   │   └── Complex routes (multi-step, transactional)
│   ├── For each route:
│   │   ├── Implement in Fastify
│   │   ├── Validate with parallel run (same request → both systems → compare)
│   │   ├── Switch proxy to Fastify
│   │   ├── ✅ Deploy. Monitor.
│   │   └── Rollback: Switch proxy back to Express
│   └── Repeat until all routes are on Fastify
│
├── Step 5: DECOMMISSION
│   ├── Remove Express from package.json
│   ├── Remove proxy (Fastify serves directly)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy.
│   └── Clean up any compatibility shims
│
└── ROLLBACK POINTS: Per-route. Maximum rollback: re-route one endpoint.

Type 3: Language Migration

*Convert codebase from one language to another*

Example: JavaScriptTypeScript

COMPASS ROUTE:
├── Step 1: CONFIGURE
│   ├── Add tsconfig.json with strict: false (permissive start)
│   ├── Enable allowJs: true (JS and TS coexist)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy. Zero behavior change.
│
├── Step 2: RENAME (leaf nodes first)
│   ├── Dependency graph: find files with NO importers (leaf nodes)
│   ├── Rename .js → .ts (one file at a time)
│   ├── Add minimal types (any where needed to compile)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy after each batch.
│   └── Work inward: leaves → branches → trunk
│
├── Step 3: TIGHTEN
│   ├── Replace `any` with real types (one module at a time)
│   ├── Enable stricter tsconfig rules incrementally:
│   │   ├── noImplicitAny
│   │   ├── strictNullChecks
│   │   ├── strictFunctionTypes
│   │   └── strict: true (final)
│   ├── ✅ Deploy after each rule change.
│   └── Rollback: Disable the rule, fix later
│
├── Step 4: CLEANUP
│   ├── Remove allowJs when all files are .ts
│   ├── Remove any remaining @ts-ignore comments
│   └── ✅ Deploy.
│
└── ROLLBACK POINTS: Per-file during rename. Per-rule during tightening.

Type 4: Database Migration

*Move from one database to another*

Type 5: Architecture Migration

*Monolith to microservices, MVC to event-driven, etc.*

Type 6: Version Migration

*Major version upgrade of a framework or library*

The Compass Process

INPUT: What are you migrating from? What to? What's the current usage?

Phase 1: SURVEY
├── Analyze current usage of the source (what features, what patterns)
├── Map source concepts → target equivalents
├── Identify gaps (source features with no target equivalent)
├── Estimate per-component migration effort
└── Identify the riskiest components (most complex, most critical)

Phase 2: ROUTE PLANNING
├── Determine migration type (library, framework, language, DB, architecture)
├── Select migration strategy:
│   ├── Strangler Fig: Route-by-route replacement (best for services)
│   ├── Branch by Abstraction: Adapter layer swaps (best for libraries)
│   ├── Parallel Run: Both systems simultaneously (best for data stores)
│   └── Incremental Rewrite: File-by-file conversion (best for language)
├── Order components: lowest risk first → highest risk last
├── Define rollback points for each step
└── Estimate total duration and effort

Phase 3: VALIDATION GATES
├── For each step, define how to verify success:
│   ├── Tests that must pass
│   ├── Metrics that must be maintained (latency, error rate, throughput)
│   ├── Comparison criteria (old output == new output)
│   └── Monitoring alerts to watch
└── Define go/no-go criteria for each step

Phase 4: COMPASS OUTPUT
├── Ordered step-by-step plan
├── Per-step: what to do, how to verify, how to roll back
├── Risk assessment per step
├── Total effort estimate
├── Dependencies between steps
└── Parallel work opportunities (what can be done simultaneously)

Output Format

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║                   MIGRATION COMPASS                         ║
║        From: moment.js → To: date-fns                       ║
║        Scope: 47 files, 126 usages                          ║
║        Estimated effort: 12 dev-hours                       ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║                                                              ║
║  ROUTE (5 steps, 0 downtime, full rollback at each step):   ║
║                                                              ║
║  [1] AUDIT (1h)                              ✅ deployable   ║
║  └── Map 126 usages across 47 files                         ║
║                                                              ║
║  [2] INSTALL + ADAPTER (2h)                  ✅ deployable   ║
║  └── date-adapter.ts wrapping moment → date-fns             ║
║  └── Rollback: delete adapter, keep moment                  ║
║                                                              ║
║  [3] REWIRE CONSUMERS (4h)                   ✅ deployable   ║
║  └── 47 files: import moment → import date-adapter          ║
║  └── Rollback: revert individual file imports               ║
║                                                              ║
║  [4] SWAP INTERNALS (3h)                     ✅ deployable   ║
║  └── Adapter: moment calls → date-fns calls                 ║
║  └── Rollback: revert adapter (1 file)                      ║
║                                                              ║
║  [5] CLEANUP (2h)                            ✅ deployable   ║
║  └── npm remove moment, inline adapter                      ║
║                                                              ║
║  RISK AREAS:                                                 ║
║  ├── Timezone handling differs (3 usages need manual review) ║
║  ├── Locale formatting differs for zh-CN and ar-SA           ║
║  └── moment.duration() has no exact date-fns equivalent      ║
║                                                              ║
║  PARALLEL OPPORTUNITIES:                                     ║
║  Steps 3 can be split across developers (per-directory)      ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

When to Invoke

  • When someone says "let's just swap it out" (it's never "just")
  • When planning any library, framework, or language migration
  • When upgrading a major version with breaking changes
  • When evaluating whether a migration is worth the cost
  • When a migration is "halfway done" and stalled (Compass can re-route from current state)

Why It Matters

80% of failed migrations fail for the same reason: they tried to change too much at once, had no rollback plan, and ended up with two half-working systems. The remaining 20% fail because they underestimated the scope.

Migration Compass eliminates both failure modes. Every step is small. Every step is deployable. Every step has a rollback. And the full scope is visible before you start.

Zero external dependencies. Zero API calls. Pure codebase analysis and planning.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

77.45%
按下载量换算2,275

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills