Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

meta-ads-recommendation元广告推荐

Agent Skill

meta-ads-recommendation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,036

周安装

124

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

972
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:meta-ads-recommendation(元广告推荐)
来源仓库:https://github.com/elias-didoo/meta-ads-recommendation
安装命令:
openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation

简介

基于数据分析生成优先级明确的元广告优化行动计划。

  • 帮助用户决定如何处理低效或异常表现的营销活动。
  • 输出可执行建议列表,附带预期收益评估参考值。
  • 依赖前置分析技能提供准确输入数据源。meta-ads-recommendation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 原始文档强调建议需结合业务上下文二次判断后实施。

SKILL.md

name
meta-ads-recommendation
description
[Didoo AI] Produces specific, prioritized action plans based on campaign analysis data. Use when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both. All analysis skills route here for the final recommendation output.

Meta Ads Optimization Recommendations

When to Use

Loaded when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both.


Prerequisites

Before giving recommendations, you need performance data. Either:

  1. Run an analysis skill first (meta-ads-analysis, meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis, meta-ads-audience-analysis, etc.)
  2. Or use the analysis data already in the conversation

If no analysis data exists: *"I need to look at your campaign data before I can give recommendations. What time period should I analyze?"*


Session Context Keys This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations. See the full table at the bottom of this file.


Step 1: Understand the Full Picture

Review the analysis conclusions and extract:

  • Funnel weak points
  • Trend signals
  • Anomalies
  • Data quality

Factor in brand or campaign context:

  • Early-stage brand → higher CPL is normal initially
  • Testing campaign → focus on learning, not scaling
  • Scaling campaign → focus on efficiency and volume capacity

Step 2: Map Problems to Actions

Problem You SeeLikely CauseRecommended Action
CTR less than 1% or decliningCreative fatigue, weak hook, audience mismatchTest new creative angles; narrow audience if broad
LPV rate less than 70% or decliningAd doesn't match landing page; page loads slowlyCheck landing page relevance and speed; align messaging
Conversion rate decliningLanding page or offer issueReview page UX, form friction, offer clarity
cost_per_result risingSaturation, competition, fatigueCheck frequency; if > 3, refresh creative or widen audience
Frequency > 3Audience seeing ads too oftenExpand audience or rotate in new creative
Spend less than 50% of budgetAudience too narrow, bid too low, ad quality issuesWiden targeting; check if ad is stuck in learning
Stuck in Learning phaseNot enough results to exitIncrease budget or consolidate to fewer adsets
One segment vastly outperformingSystem finding winners correctlyShift more budget to winner; pause underperformers
All healthy but low volumeBudget ceilingIncrease budget gradually — max 20% at a time

Step 3: Prioritize — Pick 1 to 3 Actions

Prioritization rules:

  1. Severity — How much is this hurting results right now?
  2. Actionability — Can it be fixed with tools/data available?
  3. Confidence — Is the data clear enough to be sure?

Optional additions (0–2, only if genuinely useful):

  • Things worth monitoring but not urgent
  • Early warning signs to watch

If nothing needs fixing: say so and give 1–2 things to keep an eye on.


Step 4: Landing Page Diagnostic

When funnel data points to the landing page (LPV rate or CVR is the weak point), run this diagnostic before recommending creative or audience changes.

Step 4a: LPV Rate Check

First — determine campaign type:

  • Lead gen / Conversions objective → use Lead gen benchmarks below
  • E-commerce / Purchase objective → use E-commerce benchmarks below
Campaign TypeLPV RateIndicates
E-commerce< 70%Landing page issue likely
E-commerce≥ 70%Ad-to-page alignment is healthy
Lead gen< 50%Investigate form or page
Lead gen≥ 50%LPV is not the bottleneck

E-commerce only: If LPV is healthy but CVR is low → problem is deeper in the funnel (offer, pricing, trust signals).

Lead gen only: If LPV is healthy but CPL is still high → check form friction (Step 4c) and CAPI status (Step 4b) before concluding the landing page is fine.

Step 4b: CAPI Connection Check

Before diagnosing an LPV or CVR problem:

  1. Verify Meta pixel is firing on the landing page (check Events Manager → Test Events)
  2. Verify Conversions API is connected and sending events back
  3. If CAPI is not connected, CPL shown will be artificially high — this is a data problem, not an ad problem

Step 4c: Form Friction Check (Lead Gen)

  • Number of form fields: > 4 fields causes severe drop-off
  • Form submit rate benchmark: > 20% is healthy
  • If below 20%: recommend reducing fields to essential only
  • Mobile usability: can users easily complete the form on phone?

Step 4d: Disconnect Diagnosis

SignalLikely CauseRecommended Action
LPV < 70%, CVR OKAd-to-page messaging mismatchReview headline and CTA alignment
LPV OK, CVR < 50%Offer or landing page UX issueInvestigate page content and trust signals
Both LPV and CVR lowFunnel-wide problemFix landing page first before changing ads
LPV and CVR OK but CPL highAudience too broad or CAPI not connectedCheck targeting or verify CAPI is sending offline data

Step 5: Format Each Recommendation

Every recommendation needs:

  1. What — Specific action (which ad, which adset, what change, exact numbers)
  2. Why — The data point that led to this conclusion

Optional:

  1. Expected outcome — What should improve and by how much (only if it adds real clarity)

Good example:

Pause ad "Blue Banner v2" — Why: Spent $320 but only 2 leads (CPL $160) vs. account average CPL $45. CTR 0.6% vs. 1.8% average. Drags down overall efficiency.

Bad example:

"Consider optimizing your creative." (no specific action, no data)

Step 6: Constraints

Budget change exceptions — when to break the 20% rule

ConditionMax adjustment per change
cost_per_result is 15%+ below target (winner signal)+50%
cost_per_result is above target20% (standard)
Newly launched, spending < 50% of budgetCheck delivery first, then adjust

General rules

  • Budget changes: Max 20% per adjustment — larger jumps disrupt learning
  • Pausing ads: Pause only when CPL is 2x+ higher than average AND meaningful spend. Don't pause during learning phase unless clearly failing.
  • Audience changes: Major targeting changes reset learning — prefer creating a new adset.
  • Creative recommendations: Be specific about direction: "Test a hook around [specific pain point]", not just "new creative". Suggest 2–3 new variations.
  • Landing page issues: Acknowledge we can't see the page directly. Infer from LPV rate and conversion rate data.

Auction Overlap

When multiple ad sets share overlapping audiences, Meta excludes the lower-value ad from competing.

Diagnosis:

  1. Check Opportunity score in Account Overview
  2. Look for multiple ad sets stuck in Learning Limited simultaneously

Solutions:

  1. Combine similar ad sets — consolidates learning
  2. Turn off overlapping ad sets — move budget to the active ad set

Step 7: Output Format

Brief context sentence, then:

Recommendations:

  1. [Action title] — Why: [data-backed reason] — How: [specific steps in Ads Manager]
  2. [Action title] — ...
  3. [Action title] — ...

Other observations: Things worth watching, not urgent.


Multi-turn Refinement

If user pushes back ("too aggressive", "I don't want to pause that"):

  • Adjust only that specific point
  • Don't repeat the full list unless asked

Tone

Advisory — professional but warm. Specific and data-driven. "Execution needs to happen in Meta Ads Manager — I can walk you through the steps." "Once you've made these changes, I can re-analyze in a few days to see the impact."


Restrictions

  • Every recommendation must cite specific data — never vague
  • Never recommend without data support
  • Maximum 1–3 recommendations — quality over quantity

Session Context — What This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations:

KeyWritten ByDescription
funnel_weak_pointsmeta-ads-analysisWhere the biggest funnel drop-off occurs
trend_signalsmeta-ads-analysisDirection of key metrics
anomaliesmeta-ads-analysisUnusual findings
data_qualitymeta-ads-analysisWhether data is sufficient to act on
lp_diagnosismeta-ads-lead-gen-analysis (primary)Ad side vs. landing page side — lead-gen-specific diagnosis
lp_diagnosis_generalmeta-ads-analysis (fallback)Ad side vs. landing page side — general diagnosis
capi_statusmeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisCAPI connection status
cpl_breakdownmeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisWhich funnel stage is the CPL bottleneck
recommended_fix_prioritymeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisRanked fix order for lead gen
budget_reallocation_planmeta-ads-audience-analysisSpecific audience budget shifts
audience_issuesmeta-ads-audience-analysisOverlap and misallocation findings
rotation_pipelinemeta-ads-creative-fatigueCreative inventory by status
fatigue_levelmeta-ads-creative-fatiguePer-creative fatigue classification
days_until_deathmeta-ads-creative-fatigueEstimated creative lifespan
primary_root_causemeta-ads-drop-diagnosisRoot cause of sudden performance drop
recovery_planmeta-ads-drop-diagnosisStructured recovery steps
If no analysis context keys are present, ask the user: "I need to analyze your campaign data first. What time period should I look at?"

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.04%
按下载量换算865

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills