Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

test-case-design测试用例设计

Agent Skill

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

总安装

504

周安装

21

GitHub Stars

61

下载量

168
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-case-design(测试用例设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/test-case-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design

简介

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化。

  • 适合整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案或检查视觉一致性。
  • 需结合现有品牌和设计系统,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及页面改动应通过截图预览检查表现。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design。
  • 建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写。

SKILL.md

Test Case Design Techniques

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Test Case Design tasks - Working on apply systematic test case design techniques including equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision tables, and state transition testing
  • Planning or design - Need guidance on Test Case Design approaches
  • Best practices - Want to follow established patterns and standards

Overview

Systematic test case design techniques ensure thorough coverage while minimizing test case count. These black-box techniques derive test cases from specifications without knowledge of internal implementation.

Equivalence Partitioning

Divide input data into equivalent classes where any value should produce the same behavior.

Process

  1. Identify input conditions
  2. Divide into valid and invalid partitions
  3. Select one representative value from each partition
  4. Create test cases for each partition

Example: Age Validation (18-65)

PartitionRangeRepresentativeExpected
Invalid (below)< 1810Reject
Valid18-6530Accept
Invalid (above)> 6570Reject

Test Cases:

  • TC1: age = 10 → Reject (invalid below)
  • TC2: age = 30 → Accept (valid)
  • TC3: age = 70 → Reject (invalid above)

Multiple Input Partitions

Combine partitions systematically:

Input A: {Valid, Invalid}
Input B: {Valid, Invalid}

Combinations:
1. A-Valid, B-Valid → Expected: Success
2. A-Valid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for B
3. A-Invalid, B-Valid → Expected: Error for A
4. A-Invalid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for both

Boundary Value Analysis

Test at and around partition boundaries where defects commonly occur.

Process

  1. Identify boundaries from equivalence partitions
  2. Test at minimum, just below, just above, and maximum
  3. Include special values (0, empty, null)

Example: Age Validation (18-65)

BoundaryTest ValuesExpected
Below minimum17Reject
At minimum18Accept
Above minimum19Accept
Normal40Accept
Below maximum64Accept
At maximum65Accept
Above maximum66Reject

Extended Boundaries:

  • 0 (edge case)
  • -1 (negative)
  • MAX_INT (overflow)
  • null (missing)

.NET Example

public class AgeValidationTests
{
    [Theory]
    [InlineData(17, false)]  // Below minimum
    [InlineData(18, true)]   // At minimum
    [InlineData(19, true)]   // Above minimum
    [InlineData(40, true)]   // Normal
    [InlineData(64, true)]   // Below maximum
    [InlineData(65, true)]   // At maximum
    [InlineData(66, false)]  // Above maximum
    [InlineData(0, false)]   // Zero
    [InlineData(-1, false)]  // Negative
    public void ValidateAge_ReturnsExpected(int age, bool expected)
    {
        var result = _validator.IsValidAge(age);
        Assert.Equal(expected, result);
    }
}

Decision Table Testing

Test complex business rules with multiple conditions systematically.

Process

  1. Identify conditions (inputs)
  2. Identify actions (outputs)
  3. Create table with all condition combinations
  4. Simplify using "don't care" conditions

Example: Discount Calculation

Conditions:

  • Is member? (Y/N)
  • Order > $100? (Y/N)
  • Has coupon? (Y/N)

Actions:

  • Apply member discount (10%)
  • Apply bulk discount (5%)
  • Apply coupon discount (15%)
RuleMemberOrder>$100CouponMember%Bulk%Coupon%
R1YYYXXX
R2YYNXX-
R3YNYX-X
R4YNNX--
R5NYY-XX
R6NYN-X-
R7NNY--X
R8NNN---

.NET Example

public class DiscountCalculationTests
{
    public static TheoryData<bool, decimal, bool, decimal> DiscountScenarios => new()
    {
        { true, 150m, true, 0.30m },   // R1: Member + Bulk + Coupon
        { true, 150m, false, 0.15m },  // R2: Member + Bulk
        { true, 50m, true, 0.25m },    // R3: Member + Coupon
        { true, 50m, false, 0.10m },   // R4: Member only
        { false, 150m, true, 0.20m },  // R5: Bulk + Coupon
        { false, 150m, false, 0.05m }, // R6: Bulk only
        { false, 50m, true, 0.15m },   // R7: Coupon only
        { false, 50m, false, 0.00m },  // R8: No discount
    };

    [Theory]
    [MemberData(nameof(DiscountScenarios))]
    public void CalculateDiscount_ReturnsExpected(
        bool isMember, decimal orderTotal, bool hasCoupon, decimal expectedDiscount)
    {
        var discount = _calculator.Calculate(isMember, orderTotal, hasCoupon);
        Assert.Equal(expectedDiscount, discount);
    }
}

State Transition Testing

Test systems with distinct states and transitions between them.

Process

  1. Identify states
  2. Identify valid transitions
  3. Create state transition table/diagram
  4. Design tests for each transition
  5. Include invalid transition tests

Example: Order State Machine

         ┌──────────┐
         │  Draft   │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ submit()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
    ┌────│ Pending  │────┐
    │    └────┬─────┘    │
    │         │ approve()│ reject()
    │         ▼          ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐
    │    │ Approved │  │ Rejected │
    │    └────┬─────┘  └──────────┘
    │         │ ship()
    │         ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐
    └────│ Shipped  │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ deliver()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
         │Delivered │
         └──────────┘

State Transition Table

Current StateEventNext StateValid
DraftsubmitPending
Draftapprove-
PendingapproveApproved
PendingrejectRejected
ApprovedshipShipped
ShippeddeliverDelivered
Delivered*-

.NET Example

public class OrderStateTests
{
    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Submit_TransitionsToPending()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        order.Submit();
        Assert.Equal(OrderStatus.Pending, order.Status);
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Approve_ThrowsInvalidStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Approve());
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Delivered_AnyAction_ThrowsFinalStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Delivered };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Cancel());
    }
}

Pairwise Testing

Efficiently test combinations when full combinatorial testing is impractical.

Concept

Most defects are caused by interactions between 2 parameters. Testing all pairs covers most risks with fewer tests.

Example: Browser Compatibility

Parameters:

  • Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
  • OS: Windows, macOS, Linux
  • Version: Latest, Previous

Full combinations: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24 tests Pairwise coverage: 8-12 tests (covers all pairs)

Pairwise Test Set

TestBrowserOSVersion
1ChromeWindowsLatest
2FirefoxmacOSPrevious
3SafarimacOSLatest
4EdgeWindowsPrevious
5ChromeLinuxPrevious
6FirefoxWindowsLatest
7ChromemacOSLatest
8EdgeLinuxLatest

Use tools like PICT, AllPairs, or online generators.

Error Guessing

Experience-based technique to identify likely defect areas.

Common Error Patterns

CategoryExamples
Null/Emptynull input, empty string, empty collection
Boundariesoff-by-one, overflow, underflow
FormatInvalid date, malformed email, wrong encoding
StateRace conditions, stale data, concurrency
ResourcesMemory exhaustion, connection limits, timeouts
SecuritySQL injection, XSS, path traversal

Error Guessing Checklist

  • What if input is null?
  • What if input is empty?
  • What if input contains special characters?
  • What if input exceeds maximum length?
  • What if concurrent requests occur?
  • What if external service fails?
  • What if database connection drops?
  • What if input is negative?
  • What if list has duplicates?

Technique Selection Guide

ScenarioRecommended Technique
Range validationBoundary Value + Equivalence
Complex business rulesDecision Table
State-dependent behaviorState Transition
Multi-parameter inputPairwise
Error handlingError Guessing
Critical calculationsAll techniques combined

Integration Points

Inputs from:

  • Requirements → Test conditions
  • test-strategy-planning skill → Coverage targets

Outputs to:

  • acceptance-criteria-authoring skill → Scenario coverage
  • Test automation → Test data

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算59

Claude

31.12%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

16.38%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

8.29%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills