Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
运维和基础设施需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

professional-communication专业沟通

Agent Skill

professional-communication 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

261

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

61

下载量

92
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:professional-communication(专业沟通)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/professional-communication
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill professional-communication
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill professional-communication

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。

  • 适合围绕代码变更、仓库状态和协作事项进行整理。
  • 建议结合原始 README 了解具体操作流程。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发网络请求。
  • professional-communication 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Professional Communication

Overview

This skill provides frameworks and guidance for effective professional communication in software development contexts. Whether you're writing an email to stakeholders, crafting a team chat message, or preparing meeting agendas, these principles help you communicate clearly and build professional credibility.

Core principle: Effective communication isn't about proving how much you know - it's about ensuring your message is received and understood.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing emails to teammates, managers, or stakeholders
  • Crafting team chat messages or async communications
  • Preparing meeting agendas or summaries
  • Translating technical concepts for non-technical audiences
  • Structuring status updates or reports
  • Improving clarity of written communication

Keywords: email, chat, teams, slack, discord, message, writing, communication, meeting, agenda, status update, report

Core Frameworks

The What-Why-How Structure

Use this universal framework to organize any professional message:

ComponentPurposeExample
WhatState the topic/request clearly"We need to delay the release by one week"
WhyExplain the reasoning"Critical bug found in payment processing"
HowOutline next steps/action items"QA will retest by Thursday; I'll update stakeholders Friday"

Apply to: Emails, status updates, meeting talking points, technical explanations

Three Golden Rules for Written Communication

  1. Start with a clear subject/purpose - Recipients should immediately grasp what your message is about
  2. Use bullets, headlines, and scannable formatting - Nobody wants a wall of text
  3. Key messages first - Busy people appreciate efficiency; state your main point upfront

Audience Calibration

Before communicating, ask yourself:

  1. Who are you writing to? (Technical peers, managers, stakeholders, customers)
  2. What level of detail do they need? (High-level overview vs implementation details)
  3. What's the value for them? (How does this affect their work/decisions?)

Email Best Practices

Subject Line Formula

Instead ofTry
"Project updates""Project X: Status Update and Next Steps"
"Question""Quick question: API rate limiting approach"
"FYI""FYI: Deployment scheduled for Tuesday 3pm"

Email Structure Template

**Subject:** [Project/Topic]: [Specific Purpose]

Hi [Name],

[1-2 sentences stating the key point or request upfront]

**Context/Background:**
- [Bullet point 1]
- [Bullet point 2]

**What I need from you:**
- [Specific action or decision needed]
- [Timeline if applicable]

[Optional: Brief next steps or follow-up plan]

Best,
[Your name]

Common Email Types

TypeKey Elements
Status UpdateProgress summary, blockers, next steps, timeline
RequestClear ask, context, deadline, why it matters
EscalationIssue summary, impact, attempted solutions, needed decision
FYI/AnnouncementWhat changed, who's affected, any required action

For templates: See references/email-templates.md

Team Messaging Etiquette

Note: Examples use Slack terminology, but these principles apply equally to Microsoft Teams, Discord, or any team messaging platform.

When to Use Chat vs Email

Use ChatUse Email
Quick questions with short answersDetailed documentation needing records
Real-time coordinationFormal communications to stakeholders
Informal team discussionsMessages requiring careful review
Time-sensitive updatesComplex explanations with multiple parts

Team Messaging Best Practices

  1. Use threads - Keep main channels scannable; follow-ups go in threads
  2. @mention thoughtfully - Don't notify people unnecessarily
  3. Channel organization - Right channel for right topic
  4. Be direct - "Can you review my PR?" beats "Hey, are you busy?"
  5. Async-friendly - Write messages that don't require immediate response

The "No Hello" Principle

Instead of:

You: Hi
You: Are you there?
You: Can I ask you something?
[waiting...]

Try:

You: Hi Sarah - quick question about the deployment script.
     Getting a permission error on line 42. Have you seen this before?
     Here's the error: [paste error]

Technical vs Non-Technical Communication

When to Be Technical vs Accessible

AudienceApproach
Engineering peersTechnical details, code examples, architecture specifics
Technical managersBalance of detail and high-level impact
Non-technical stakeholdersBusiness impact, analogies, outcomes over implementation
CustomersPlain language, what it means for them, avoid jargon

Three Strategies for Simplification

  1. Start with the big picture before details - People process "why" before "how"
  2. Simplify without losing accuracy - Use analogies; replace jargon with plain language
  3. Know when to switch - Read the room; adjust based on questions and engagement

Jargon Translation Examples

TechnicalPlain Language
"Microservices architecture""Our system is split into smaller, independent pieces that can scale separately"
"Asynchronous message processing""Tasks are queued and processed in the background"
"CI/CD pipeline""Automated process that tests and deploys our code"
"Database migration""Updating how our data is organized and stored"

For more examples: See references/jargon-simplification.md

Writing Clarity Principles

Active Voice Over Passive Voice

Active voice is clearer, more direct, and conveys authority:

Passive (avoid)Active (prefer)
"A bug was identified by the team""The team identified a bug"
"The feature will be implemented""We will implement the feature"
"Errors were found during testing""Testing revealed errors"

Eliminate Filler Words

Instead ofUse
"At this point in time""Now"
"In the event that""If"
"Due to the fact that""Because"
"In order to""To"
"I just wanted to check if""Can you"

The "So What?" Test

After writing, ask: "So what? Why does this matter to the reader?"

If you can't answer clearly, restructure your message to lead with the value/impact.

Meeting Communication

Before: Agenda Best Practices

Every meeting invite should include:

  1. Clear objective - What will be accomplished?
  2. Agenda items - Topics to cover with time estimates
  3. Preparation required - What should attendees bring/review?
  4. Expected outcome - Decision needed? Information sharing? Brainstorm?

During: Facilitation Tips

  • Time-box discussions - "Let's spend 5 minutes on this, then move on"
  • Capture action items live - Who does what by when
  • Parking lot - Note off-topic items for later

After: Summary Format

**Meeting: [Topic] - [Date]**

**Attendees:** [Names]

**Key Decisions:**
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]

**Action Items:**
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]

**Next Steps:**
- [Follow-up meeting if needed]
- [Documents to share]

For structures by meeting type: See references/meeting-structures.md

Quick Reference: Communication Checklist

Before sending any professional communication:

  • Clear purpose - Can the recipient understand intent in 5 seconds?
  • Right audience - Is this the appropriate person/channel?
  • Key message first - Is the main point upfront?
  • Scannable - Are there bullets, headers, short paragraphs?
  • Action clear - Does the recipient know what (if anything) they need to do?
  • Jargon check - Will the audience understand all terminology?
  • Tone appropriate - Is it professional but not cold?
  • Proofread - Any typos or unclear phrasing?

Related Resources

  • references/email-templates.md - Ready-to-use email templates by type
  • references/meeting-structures.md - Structures for standups, retros, reviews
  • references/jargon-simplification.md - Technical-to-plain-language translations

Related Skills

  • feedback-conversations - For difficult conversations and feedback delivery
  • technical-presentations - For structuring talks and presentations
  • /draft-email - Generate emails using these frameworks

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Antigravity

30.17%
按下载量换算28

trae

22.98%
按下载量换算21

windsurf

19.23%
按下载量换算18

Claude Code

11.75%
按下载量换算11

Codex

6.91%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

3.67%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills