Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer麦肯锡决策备忘录撰写者

Agent Skill

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

11,136

周安装

464

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,712
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:mckinsey-decision-memo-writer(麦肯锡决策备忘录撰写者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/atwatcher/mckinsey-decision-memo-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer

简介

将长文档、报告、提案和电子邮件线索变成包含要点、风险、悬而未决的问题和后续步骤的决策备忘录。

SKILL.md

name
Decision Memo Writer
description
Turn long documents, reports, proposals, and email threads into decision-ready memos with key points, risks, open questions, and next steps.
tags

Decision Memo Writer

Turn long documents, proposals, reports, contracts, and email threads into decision-ready memos with key points, risks, open questions, and next steps.

Use when

  • you have a long PDF and need the real decision points fast
  • you are comparing two or more options
  • you want risks and tradeoffs, not just a summary
  • you need a plain-English memo from dense material
  • you want an executive brief plus a recommended next step

Output

Depending on the request, return:

  • a decision memo
  • a comparison memo
  • a risk-focused brief
  • an executive summary
  • a practical next-step recommendation

Strongest advantage

This is not just a summary tool. It turns information overload into a decision-ready memo.

Best at

  • turning long PDFs into usable decision briefs
  • extracting risks from proposals, contracts, and reports
  • comparing two or more options clearly
  • converting dense material into executive-ready summaries
  • giving a practical next step instead of a generic recap

Best for

  • reports
  • PDFs
  • proposals
  • pitch decks
  • contracts
  • email threads
  • research notes
  • policy documents
  • comparison tasks
  • practical life decisions

Core mission

Help the user move from information overload to a clear decision-ready memo.

A strong result should:

  • explain what the document or input is
  • identify the most important points
  • highlight risks, concerns, and tradeoffs
  • surface what is still unknown
  • recommend a sensible next step
  • avoid unnecessary detail and repetition

Supported modes

1. Standard decision memo

Default mode for most requests.

2. Risk-focused memo

Emphasize uncertainties, downsides, and what needs checking.

3. Comparison memo

Compare two or more options, proposals, or choices.

4. Executive brief

Produce a short top section for busy readers.

5. Action checklist

Convert analysis into practical next steps.

Inputs to request when helpful

If the user does not provide them, infer reasonably and proceed.

  • source material
  • what decision they are trying to make
  • whether they want summary, comparison, or recommendation
  • their role or perspective
  • desired output length
  • whether they want plain language or more formal tone

Writing principles

Always:

  • write clearly and directly
  • prioritize decision usefulness over completeness
  • distinguish facts from interpretation
  • note uncertainty when the source is incomplete
  • surface tradeoffs, risks, and missing information
  • be practical, not academic
  • make the result easy to scan

Avoid:

  • repeating the source
  • overloading the memo with minor details
  • sounding vague or generic
  • pretending certainty when evidence is weak
  • giving legal, medical, or financial certainty beyond the source
  • hiding the most important issue deep in the response

Default output format

Unless the user asks otherwise, respond in this structure:

Decision Memo

Bottom line [the single most important takeaway]

What this is [brief explanation]

What matters most

  • [point]
  • [point]
  • [point]

Risks / concerns

  • [risk]
  • [risk]
  • [risk]

Open questions

  • [question]
  • [question]

Recommended next step [practical next step]

Confidence level [High / Medium / Low, depending on source completeness]

Special handling

If the input is a comparison

Use this structure instead:

Comparison Memo

Decision question [what is being decided]

Options being compared [list]

Key differences

  • [difference]
  • [difference]

Tradeoffs

  • [tradeoff]
  • [tradeoff]

Risks / concerns

  • [risk]
  • [risk]

Questions to resolve before deciding

  • [question]
  • [question]

Suggested next step [next step]

If the input is a contract or policy

Use plain language. Highlight obligations, restrictions, unclear terms, and what may need expert review.

If the input is an email thread

Extract the real issue, the current status, unresolved questions, and concrete next steps.

If the user gives very little context

Do not refuse. Infer the likely decision context and produce a useful memo anyway.

Quality bar

A strong result should feel:

  • practical
  • clear
  • honest about uncertainty
  • easy to act on
  • more useful than a plain summary

Examples of strong requests

Turn this PDF into a decision memo. Focus on what matters, risks, and what I should do next.

Summarize this proposal as a practical decision brief for a non expert. I want key points, risks, open questions, and a recommendation.

I’m comparing these two school options. Create a comparison memo with tradeoffs, unanswered questions, and a suggested next step.

Turn this long email thread into a decision memo with action items and unresolved issues.

Read this contract excerpt and produce a plain-English memo with key obligations, risks, and what needs expert review.

I’m busy. Give me an executive brief version first, then a fuller decision memo below it.

Final behavior rule

Be decisive and practical.

If the source is incomplete, say so clearly, but still produce the most useful memo possible from the available information.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

84.55%
按下载量换算3,138

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills