Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

lucky-collaborative-research幸运的合作研究

Agent Skill

lucky-collaborative-research 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

3,272

周安装

135

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,069
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lucky-collaborative-research(幸运的合作研究)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rmbell09-lang/lucky-collaborative-research
安装命令:
openclaw skills install lucky-collaborative-research
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install lucky-collaborative-research

简介

lucky-collaborative-research 结合 Lucky(数据整理)与 Jinx(分析)完成研究工作。

  • 适用于市场研究、竞品分析或趋势预测等需要多阶段处理的场景。
  • 自动抓取网络信息并由 LLM 提炼结论,输出结构化报告。
  • 使用前需指定研究领域和可信源白名单,建议设置去重阈值。
  • 注意版权合规,不得用于商业用途或侵犯知识产权的内容整理。

SKILL.md

name
collaborative-research
description
Lucky (internet) + Jinx (analysis) collaborative research workflow. Lucky gathers raw data from web sources, Jinx analyzes and structures findings. Use for market research, competitive analysis, marketplace intelligence, API documentation review, trend analysis, pricing research, or any research requiring both web access and deep analysis. Includes market research templates for competitor/product analysis.

Collaborative Research Workflow

Core Principle: Divide research into Lucky (data gathering) + Jinx (analysis) for maximum efficiency and parallel processing.

When to Use This Skill

Perfect for:

  • Market research (competitor analysis, pricing)
  • API documentation review
  • Trend analysis (Google Trends, marketplaces)
  • Technical documentation analysis
  • Large-scale content analysis
  • Multi-source data comparison

Not suitable for:

  • Simple lookups (use direct web_search/web_fetch)
  • Real-time data that changes quickly
  • Single-page analysis (not worth the overhead)

The 3-Phase Process

Phase 1: Raw Data Gathering (Lucky)

Time: 30-60% of total project time Focus: Speed and coverage, not precision

  1. Set up data directory structure
   mkdir -p /workspace/research/raw-data/YYYY-MM-DD-project
  1. Use Puppeteer for systematic data collection

- Navigate to target sites - Capture BOTH html and text: { html: document.body.innerHTML, text: document.body.innerText } - Save with metadata: URL, timestamp, query/source - Don't fight DOM selectors — capture everything

  1. Save structured files for Jinx
   METADATA:
   URL: [source_url]
   TIMESTAMP: [iso_timestamp] 
   QUERY: [search_query]
   
   RAW TEXT:
   [page_text_content]
   
   RAW HTML:
   [full_html_content]
  1. Transfer to Mac Mini SSD
   scp -i ~/.ssh/lucky_to_mac file.html luckyai@100.90.7.148:~/temp/
   ssh -i ~/.ssh/lucky_to_mac luckyai@100.90.7.148 "mv ~/temp/* '/Volumes/Crucial X10/research/raw-data/project/'"

Phase 2: Parallel Analysis (Jinx)

Time: 20-40% of total project time Focus: Pattern extraction and structured output

  1. Task Assignment Validation

- ✅ Analyzing local files (no internet needed) - ✅ Structured data processing - ✅ Text analysis and extraction

  1. Send structured analysis tasks to Jinx
   curl -X POST http://localhost:3001/task -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{
     "prompt": "Analyze files in /Volumes/Crucial X10/research/raw-data/project/. Extract: [specific_data_points]. Output structured JSON with [required_format]. Provide analysis summary with [specific_insights].",
     "priority": "high"
   }'
  1. Key prompting strategies for Jinx:

- Be specific about data extraction requirements - Request JSON output format - Ask for both raw findings AND summary analysis - Include comparison requirements if multiple sources

Phase 3: Compilation & Skills Documentation (Lucky)

Time: 10-20% of total project time Focus: Synthesis and actionable insights

  1. Collect Jinx results
   curl -s http://localhost:3001/results/[task-id]
  1. Compile comprehensive report

- Executive summary with key findings - Structured data tables/comparisons - Strategic recommendations - Process insights and improvements

  1. Document process learnings

- What worked well / areas for improvement - Time saved vs sequential approach - Quality of analysis vs manual extraction

Best Practices

Data Gathering (Lucky)

  • Capture everything — let Jinx filter, don't pre-filter
  • Use consistent file naming — project-source-timestamp.html
  • Include rich metadata — helps Jinx understand context
  • Work in batches — send first batch to Jinx while gathering more

Analysis Tasks (Jinx)

  • Be specific about extraction requirements
  • Request execution — ask Jinx to run analysis scripts, not just provide them
  • Structure output — JSON format for easy parsing
  • Ask for insights — not just data extraction but pattern analysis

Collaboration

  • Send tasks early — don't wait for all data before starting analysis
  • Check progress regularly — curl status API to monitor queue
  • Quality over quantity — better to analyze fewer sources deeply

Time Estimates

Research ScopeLucky TimeJinx TimeTotal Effective
Small (3-5 sources)20 min15 min25 min
Medium (5-10 sources)40 min20 min45 min
Large (10+ sources)60 min30 min70 min

*Effective time = max(Lucky, Jinx) due to parallelization*

Security Considerations

  • HTML sanitization — Strip <script> tags before sending to Jinx
  • No executable content — Only pass text/HTML data, never code
  • Local processing — Jinx has no internet access, data stays secure
  • File permissions — Ensure Jinx can read files on SSD

Success Metrics

  • Speed: 30-50% time savings vs sequential research
  • Coverage: Ability to analyze larger datasets comprehensively
  • Quality: Structured, actionable insights vs raw data dumps
  • Scalability: Process works for 5 sources or 50 sources

Example Use Cases

  1. Market Research: Lucky scrapes Gumroad/Etsy → Jinx extracts pricing/features
  2. API Comparison: Lucky gathers docs → Jinx compares capabilities/pricing
  3. Trend Analysis: Lucky gets Google Trends → Jinx identifies patterns
  4. Competitor Analysis: Lucky browses sites → Jinx structures competitive matrix
  5. Content Analysis: Lucky gathers articles → Jinx summarizes themes/insights

Market Research Template

For marketplace/competitor analysis specifically, use this structured approach:

Data Collection Checklist

For each competitor/product found:

## Competitor: [Name]
- Product: [Title]
- Price: $[Amount]
- Bundle Size: [X items]
- Format: [Canva/PSD/AI/etc]
- Sales Indicators: [Reviews/ratings/badges]
- Key Features: [List]
- Customer Complaints: [Common issues from reviews]
- Opportunities: [What they're missing]

Market Analysis Phases

  1. Market Mapping — Browse categories on target platforms (Gumroad, Etsy, Creative Market, Redbubble). Screenshot layouts. Document pricing patterns.
  2. Competitor Deep Dive — Top performers, pricing intelligence, positioning, visual trends.
  3. Customer Intelligence — Mine reviews for pain points, gaps, price sensitivity, feature requests.
  4. Trend Analysis — Style evolution, platform preferences, niche saturation, seasonal patterns.
  5. Gap Analysis — What customers want but can't find. Underserved niches.

Browser Research Workflow

  1. Start browser session
  2. Navigate to marketplace, search category
  3. Capture screenshots of results
  4. Visit top competitor pages
  5. Document structured data per template above
  6. Save to SSD, feed to Jinx for pattern analysis

Output Deliverables

  • Structured competitor profiles
  • Pricing analysis with recommendations
  • Market gap identification
  • Customer pain point summary
  • Launch strategy recommendations

Process Evolution

Track and improve:

  • Which DOM selectors/sites work best
  • Jinx prompt patterns that yield best results
  • File transfer automation opportunities
  • Quality indicators for different research types

This skill creates a scalable, repeatable process for any research requiring both web access and deep analysis.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.77%
按下载量换算960

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills