Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ln-840-benchmark-compareln 840 基准比较

Agent Skill

ln-840-benchmark-compare 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,518

周安装

62

GitHub Stars

441

下载量

486
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-840-benchmark-compare(ln 840 基准比较)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-840-benchmark-compare
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和安装路径。
  • 建议在安装前确认维护状态、是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • ln-840-benchmark-compare 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/) are relative to skills repo root. Locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Benchmark Compare

Type: L3 Worker Category: 8XX Optimization -> 840 Benchmark

Run a clean A/B benchmark in Claude Code: one session with built-in tools only, one with hex-line. The benchmark is scenario-based, diff-validated, manifest-driven, and runtime-backed. It measures activation, correctness, time, cost, and tokens. The current runner is intentionally scoped to this internal A/B. It does not, by itself, prove best-in-class against external alternatives.


Input / Output

DirectionContent
InputRepo checkout containing mcp/hex-line-mcp/, optional references/goals.md, optional references/expectations.json
OutputComparison report in skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/{date}-comparison.md plus machine-readable benchmark summary artifact

Prerequisites

  • claude --version succeeds
  • git succeeds
  • mcp/hex-line-mcp/server.mjs exists
  • mcp/hex-line-mcp/hook.mjs exists
  • skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md exists
  • skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json exists
  • skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/mcp-bench.json exists

Quick Run

bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh \
  [skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md] \
  [skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json]

Optional extra session profile:

EXTRA_SESSION_ID=other-mcp \
EXTRA_SESSION_LABEL="Other MCP" \
EXTRA_MCP_CONFIG=/abs/path/to/other-mcp.json \
EXTRA_SETTINGS='{"disableAllHooks":true}' \
bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh

Monitor Integration (Claude Code 2.1.98+)

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/monitor_integration_pattern.md

Stream benchmark progress: Monitor(command="bash skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/scripts/run-benchmark.sh 2>&1 | grep --line-buffered -E 'scenario|PASS|FAIL|error|session'", timeout_ms=3600000, description="benchmark run")

Fallback: Bash(run_in_background=true).

The runner handles:

  • syntax preflight
  • SessionStart preflight
  • scenario extraction from goals.md
  • isolated worktrees per scenario/session
  • per-scenario diffs
  • final comparison report

Current scope:

  • built-in Claude session
  • Claude plus hex-line
  • optional third Claude-compatible session profile through EXTRA_SESSION_* environment variables

External baseline note:

  • use the same goals.md and expectations.json
  • do not rewrite scenarios to fit the external tool
  • do not make "top tool" claims from the internal A/B alone
  • the optional third session profile is only valid when it can emit the same stream-json log shape and diff artifacts

Workflow

Phase 1: Define The Canonical Suite

Use one canonical pair owned by this skill:

  • skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/goals.md
  • skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/references/expectations.json

Rules:

  • The suite must be a balanced mix of common engineering scenarios.
  • Do not design the suite to favor hex-line.
  • Every scenario in goals.md must have a matching entry in expectations.json.
  • expectations.json is the source of truth for correctness.
  • The same pair must be reused unchanged for any future external baseline.

Supported expectation fields per scenario:

FieldMeaning
idScenario identifier used in result filenames
expectedChangedFilesFiles that must change
forbiddenChangedFilesFiles that must not change
requiredDiffPatternsRegex patterns required in the saved diff
forbiddenDiffPatternsRegex patterns that must not appear in the diff
requiredResultPatternsRegex patterns required in the final assistant result text
requiredCommandsRegex patterns that must match at least one Bash command
exactChangedFilesIf true, no extra changed files are allowed

Phase 2: Preflight

The runner must pass:

  • node --check server.mjs
  • node --check hook.mjs
  • node --check extract-scenarios.mjs
  • node --check parse-results.mjs
  • SessionStart smoke check from hook.mjs

If preflight fails, the benchmark is invalid and must stop before scenarios run.

Phase 3: Execute Per Scenario

For each ## scenario in goals.md:

  1. generate a standalone prompt file
  2. create two clean worktrees from the same commit
  3. run built-in Claude session
  4. run hex-line Claude session
  5. save .jsonl logs and .diff.txt artifacts
  6. remove both worktrees

Built-in session:

  • no MCP
  • hooks disabled

Hex-line session:

  • resolved MCP config pointing to server.mjs
  • outputStyle: "hex-line"
  • PreToolUse hook through hook.mjs

Phase 4: Parse Results

parse-results.mjs evaluates each scenario for both sessions.

Scenario pass requires:

  • valid run
  • successful session completion
  • changed files match expectations
  • diff patterns match expectations
  • result text patterns match expectations
  • required commands were actually executed

Phase 5: Read The Report

The final report has these sections:

  • Scenario Outcomes
  • Activation
  • Time
  • Cost
  • Tokens
  • Tool Totals
  • Validity

Interpretation rules:

  • invalid run means setup/adoption failure, not product performance
  • scenario FAIL means correctness contract was not met
  • activation is part of product quality for hex-line, not external noise
  • this report is necessary for internal A/B evaluation, but not sufficient for best-alternative claims

Report Contract

skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/{date}-comparison.md must answer:

  • Did each scenario complete correctly?
  • Did hex-line activate cleanly without discovery drift?
  • What changed in wall time, API time, cost, output tokens, and total tool calls?
  • Was the run valid?

Do not treat raw time/cost as sufficient without scenario correctness.

External Baseline Policy

  • This skill owns the canonical suite, not a universal leaderboard.
  • If maintainers compare hex-line against external alternatives, they must reuse the same goals.md, expectations.json, and diff-based evaluation rules.
  • External runs may use different harnesses, but they must preserve the same task text, starting commit, and correctness contract.
  • If an external tool cannot satisfy the contract format, record that as a harness limitation instead of rewriting the suite to accommodate it.
  • A report that only covers built-in Claude vs hex-line must say so explicitly.

Runtime Contract

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/benchmark_worker_runtime_contract.md, shared/references/coordinator_summary_contract.md

Runtime CLI:

node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs start --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --manifest-file <file>
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs checkpoint --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --phase PHASE_0_CONFIG --payload '{...}'
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs record-summary --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default --payload '{...}'
node shared/scripts/benchmark-worker-runtime/cli.mjs complete --skill ln-840-benchmark-compare --identifier suite-default

Required state fields:

  • report_ready
  • summary_recorded
  • final_result
  • self_check_passed

Domain checkpoints:

  • PHASE_0_CONFIG
  • PHASE_1_PREFLIGHT
  • PHASE_2_LOAD_SUITE
  • PHASE_3_RUN_SCENARIOS
  • PHASE_4_PARSE_RESULTS
  • PHASE_5_WRITE_REPORT
  • PHASE_6_WRITE_SUMMARY
  • PHASE_7_SELF_CHECK

Guard rules:

  • do not advance without checkpointing the current phase
  • do not complete before benchmark-worker summary is recorded
  • do not complete before self-check passes

Runtime Coordination

  • Managed runs may pass deterministic runId and exact summaryArtifactPath.
  • Standalone runs are supported. If both are omitted, runtime creates a standalone run and writes the default summary artifact path for the benchmark-worker family.

Runtime Summary Artifact

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/coordinator_summary_contract.md

Emit a benchmark-worker summary envelope after the comparison report is written.

Managed mode:

  • write to the exact summaryArtifactPath

Standalone mode:

  • write .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/benchmark-worker/ln-840-benchmark-compare--{identifier}.json

Recommended payload:

  • scenarios_total
  • scenarios_passed
  • scenarios_failed
  • activation_valid
  • validity_verdict
  • report_path
  • warnings
  • metrics

Known Pitfalls

PitfallSolution
SessionStart not present in hex-line runFail preflight and stop
Agent drifts into ToolSearch before hex-line useTreat as activation problem and capture in report
Worktree already exists from prior crashRemove it before adding a new one
Diff artifacts missingTreat scenario correctness as failed
Simple scenario favors built-insKeep it in the suite if it is common; honesty beats cherry-picking
External comparison uses edited scenarios or relaxed expectationsTreat the comparison as invalid

Definition of Done

  • goals.md defines the canonical balanced suite
  • expectations.json fully describes scenario correctness
  • Runner passes syntax and SessionStart preflight
  • Each scenario runs in two clean worktrees from the same commit
  • Parser evaluates activation and scenario correctness from logs plus diffs
  • Final report is saved to skills-catalog/ln-840-benchmark-compare/results/
  • benchmark-worker summary artifact is written to the managed or standalone runtime path
  • Temporary worktrees are removed
  • Report states clearly whether it is internal A/B only or includes additional external baselines

Version: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-24

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.26%
按下载量换算181

Claude

26.84%
按下载量换算130

Cursor

17.85%
按下载量换算87

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算45

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills