Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ln-613-code-comments-auditorln 613 代码注释审核员

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

4,079

周安装

165

GitHub Stars

441

下载量

1,280
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-613-code-comments-auditor(ln 613 代码注释审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-613-code-comments-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-613-code-comments-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-613-code-comments-auditor

简介

用于安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查,适合梳理敏感配置和鉴权逻辑。

  • 适用于需要分析凭据风险或生成安全复核清单的场景。
  • 使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,需先确认最小权限和操作边界。
  • 涉及密钥、令牌或用户数据时应脱敏处理,避免影响生产系统。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,确保不会触发不必要的网络或文件操作。

SKILL.md

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

Inline Code Documentation Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing inline code documentation quality: comments, docstrings, and language-specific documentation blocks.

Purpose & Scope

  • Audit inline code documentation for quality and compliance across 6 categories
  • Universal for any tech stack (auto-detect comment syntax)
  • Return structured findings to coordinator with severity, location, recommendations
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Inline Code Documentation category
  • Scope is limited to comments/docstrings/JSDoc/XML docs
  • Out of scope: code design quality, naming quality, test quality, architecture quality, or feature correctness except where comments contradict code

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/mcp_tool_preferences.md.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, project_root, output_dir.

Workflow

  1. Parse Context: Extract tech stack, project root, output_dir from contextStore
  2. Scan: Find all source files (use tech_stack for detection) Hex-line primary path: Use outline(file_path) and discovery-first read_file() for code files before analyzing comments. Use edit_ready=true, verbosity="full" only if the audit turns into a follow-up edit. Do not use hex-graph here - comment quality is a code-reading problem, not a semantic graph problem.
  3. Extract: Parse inline comments + docstrings/JSDoc
  4. Audit: Run 6 category checks (see Audit Categories below)
  5. Collect Findings: Record each violation with severity, location (file:line), effort estimate (S/M/L), recommendation
  6. Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
  7. Write Report: Build full markdown report per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-613--global.md in single Write call
  8. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Categories

#CategoryWhat to Check
1WHY not WHATComments explain rationale, not obvious code behavior; no restating code
2Density (15-20%)Comment-to-code ratio within range; not over/under-commented
3No Forbidden ContentNo dates/authors; no historical notes; no code examples in comments
4Docstrings QualityMatch function signatures; parameters documented; return types accurate
5ActualityComments match code behavior; no stale references; examples runnable
6Legacy CleanupNo TODO without context; no commented-out code; no unsupported notes

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-613--global.md with category: "Inline Code Documentation" and checks: why_not_what, density, forbidden_content, docstrings_quality, actuality, legacy_cleanup.

Return summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-613--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Severity mapping:

Issue TypeSeverity
Author names, dates in commentsCRITICAL
Commented-out code blocksHIGH
Stale/outdated commentsHIGH
Obvious WHAT commentsMEDIUM
Density deviation >5%MEDIUM
Minor density deviationLOW

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report violations only; coordinator aggregates for user
  • Fix code, not rules: NEVER modify rules files (*_rules.md, *_standards.md) to make violations pass
  • Code is truth: When comment contradicts code, flag the documentation for update; do not turn this into a general code-quality review
  • WHY > WHAT: Comments explaining obvious behavior should be removed
  • Universal: Works with any language; detect comment syntax automatically
  • Location precision: Always include file:line for programmatic navigation

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir)
  • All source files scanned (tech stack from contextStore)
  • All 6 categories audited
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  • Score calculated using penalty algorithm
  • Report written to {output_dir}/ln-613--global.md (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary written per contract

Reference Files


Version: 4.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-01

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.17%
按下载量换算437

Claude

32.93%
按下载量换算422

Cursor

19.62%
按下载量换算251

Gemini CLI

10.39%
按下载量换算133

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills